Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, DutchDemons said:

Robbo and Gerald aren’t on Thursday night

:( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

 

why was there no argument about the severity of contact being downgraded from high

must say i thought the arguments were pretty thin

i could've thought of a lot of things to challenge

Just now, Hawny for Gawny said:

:( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

Great handle their bud. 

 
3 minutes ago, Its Time for Another said:

I've been known to slip into an afterthought in my time. But I digress......

So... ah...... how about this weather?  And oh yes, what the heck is happening with Jacob?!


55 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

As for the reasonable test, what sort of precedent does it establish if his suspension is upheld? 

No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

40 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

Just saw on the news that Brad Green has been sanctioned by the AFL for his twitter comment into this ban!

Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

5 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Rotating Outer Space GIF

Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule, and not explicitly stated.

Edited by kev martin

 

Come on…will struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.


Just now, Demonland said:

1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

Is this good or bad or is everyone drunk? 

Just now, kev martin said:

Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule. 

What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

Board can't come to an unanimous decision...

CASE DISMISSED!!

Edited by Demon Dynasty

2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

He may soon glow in the dark.


1 minute ago, Mickey said:

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

100%, and if our arguments weren’t considered strong, we have a decision by now!

1 minute ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Come on…will struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.

Get your money on any dogs named Bull-[censored], Joke, Farce and Travesty.


2 minutes ago, Mickey said:

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

Great point, I imagine Zita's understanding of law limits what he can actually understand and remember.

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

cripps case was 2 hours

just saying

We mostly understand what a so called "duty of care" means in a legal sense - the ability to foresee the outcome of potentially hazardous actions and the duty to avoid those actions. Overwhelmingly, there is time and space to consider actions that might fall under that duty.

How could this possibly translate to a dynamic, fast moving and physical contact sport where decisions and actions are made in microseconds? It can't.

Only a genius lawyer could concoct such an argument. It's garbage in this instance.

 
2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

it's all in the 1909 case ... read up on it

Maybe a 2 down to 1 outcome at best


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Western Bulldogs

    With only 3 games to go, all against Top 8 fancies, the Demons face a daunting task as they return to the MCG when they play the Western Bulldogs. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 52 replies
  • POSTGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to town fresh off a thumping win over the back-to-back wooden spooners, the West Coast Eagles, played in front of a sparse crowd at Marvel Stadium, the same venue that hosted last week's heartbreaking loss.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
    • 207 replies
  • VOTES: West Coast

    Captain Max Gawn has a unassailable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Kozzy Pickett, Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 27 replies
  • GAMEDAY: West Coast

    It’s Game Day and the Demons return to the scene of the crime to take on the wooden spooners.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 469 replies
  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    It was bad enough that the Melbourne Football Club created yet another humiliating scenario inside its wretched season at Marvel Stadium last Sunday, but the final insult is that it has been commanded to return to the scene of the crime to inflict further punishment on its fans this week. Incidentally, if this match preview, of a game that promises to be one of the most unattractive fixtures in the history of the game, happens to cut out of your computer screen three quarters of the way through, it’s no coincidence. I’ll be mirroring the Demons’ lacklustre effort against St Kilda from last Sunday when they conceded the largest last quarter turnaround for victory in the history of the game.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 9 replies