Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

 
3 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

How does it come to pass that you guys read it more clearly than the lawyers tasked with representing? (not a crack, just confused?)

Maybe 'Landers are far better lawyers.

3 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

How does it come to pass that you guys read it more clearly than the lawyers tasked with representing? (not a crack, just confused?)

Yeah I’m confused too.. are people watching this somewhere or making judgements purely on tweets? 
 

If it’s the latter I think it’s fair to say we have no idea what’s been said 

 
Just now, Demonland said:

30 minutes and counting

It’s not looking good. I imagine they’re trying to come up with a statement that won’t send the AFL community into meltdown. Again. 

Just now, Demonland said:

30 minutes and counting

They have to 'appear' to be giving it serious consideration, whether that is the case or not


2 minutes ago, McQueen said:

So Red, why can’t it be as simple as showing the Fogarty spoil and then Jacob’s and asking wtf is different?

Because this is an Appeal and we need to show legal errors, not other incidents missed.

 
Just now, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Maybe 'Landers are far better lawyers.

the standard of the reporting blog certainly isn't what it used to be.

I suspect one needed to be there to understand the arguments in full.

In this day and age of voice generated text not to mention zoom no reason it's not more fully reported

4 minutes ago, McQueen said:

So Red, why can’t it be as simple as showing the Fogarty spoil and then Jacob’s and asking wtf is different?

Well, according to the AFL 2023 Tribunal Guidelines, unless something has been cited by the MRO (with or without penalty) it cannot be presented as evidence in a tribunal hearing. I'm not sure if the appeals process is bound by the same guidelines, but it could be.

Purely a guess on my behalf though.

Edited by deva5610


I’m on ferry and will soon be out of signal. Any chance of a decision soon???

37 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Wednesday Adams has just taken the stand for the Dees talking about Vicarious Intent and pure Accident. Seems her logic is impeccable!!

Who is Adams?

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Because this is an Appeal and we need to show legal errors, not other incidents missed.

So the example could/should have been presented in the first appeal?

Just now, Redleg said:

Because this is an Appeal and we need to show legal errors, not other incidents missed.

I know you said you haven’t read the proceedings, but once you do I would be interested in your opinion of our defense. I’m not a lawyer but I wasn’t impressed. AFL seem to have made a stronger argument. 


7 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

How does it come to pass that you guys read it more clearly than the lawyers tasked with representing? (not a crack, just confused?)

Because we're better lawyers.

2 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

They have to 'appear' to be giving it serious consideration, whether that is the case or not

Na, their just waiting for uber eats 

The difference is I'm not pretending to know at all how this works or what it means.

Just saw that McDonald is the sole tall being named as emergency 🤮🤮

Please for the love of God now another reason for JVR not to be suspended. 


1 minute ago, Colm said:

I’m on ferry and will soon be out of signal. Any chance of a decision soon???

Maybe your captain can radio in for the result :laugh:

This is beyond a joke.

 
1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Because we're better lawyers.

I nailed my law exam in year 12

Reese Witherspoon Legal Jargon GIF


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • POSTGAME: Richmond

    The Dees ran another clinic for the second week in a row as they easily accounted for the Tigers in the lightning interrupted shortened match at Mars Stadium in Ballarat.

      • Like
    • 32 replies
  • VOTES: Richmond

    Kozzy Pickett was the man of the match last week and has a vote lead over backup ruck Max Heath who didn't play this week and 5 votes over former Saint Jack Steele. Who gets the votes in this weeks shortened match win over the Tigers? Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 5 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Richmond

    It's Game Day and the 2026 AFL Premiership season is almost upon us as the Demons take to the field for their final practice match before the first ball is kicked in anger in 16 days time. What are you expecting to see from the Dees today as they take on the Tigers at Mars Stadium in Ballarat?

      • Love
      • Like
    • 337 replies
  • NON-MFC: 2026 Practice Matches

    It's the second week of the 2026 AFL Community Series Practice Matches with games taking place all over the country. Discuss all the games not involving the Demons with the start of the AFL Premiership Season only one week away.

      • Like
    • 72 replies
  • PREGAME: Richmond

    The Demons hit the road for their last practice hit out before the start of the 2026 AFL Premiership season when they take on the Tigers at Mars Stadium in Ballarat.

      • Like
    • 146 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    It’s late February. Two teams widely predicted to finish near the foot of the AFL table in 2026 face off against each other in sweltering 30-degree heat deep in outer suburbia in a match simulation with fresh new faces and uneven team numbers. There are no nearby sheep stations on offer; the result promises nothing more than bragging rights for the winner. Nevertheless, the loser appears hopelessly adrift, whereas the other seems to have found its footing after a couple of years of struggle – perhaps a hint at bigger things to come?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.