Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I'd wager 12 with our % but I'm sure we will have more.

I think it's a pretty tight season.

Keen to hear other opinions.

 

Forget finals. Don’t finish top 4 and get a home final and we are cooked. 
We need 16 wins minimum IMO to give the flag a shake. 

 
  • Author
15 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Forget finals. Don’t finish top 4 and get a home final and we are cooked. 
We need 16 wins minimum IMO to give the flag a shake. 

Agreed but I don't think it's going to be easy. The blues look less of a threat and we play them twice. North and hawks too. At stretch id say we get 15 or 16. But I reckon 14 and % is top 4 the way the season is. 


16 minutes ago, Nascent said:

On the top 4. Fair chance it remains like it is now.

Melbourne, Brisbane, Collingwood, Geelong

 

These four sides are a mile in front of the rest. Wouldn't be surprised if there ends up a significant difference between 4th and 5th - even 3 games. Ordering these sides right now is anyone's guess. It'll all come down to injuries and who has the healthiest list come finals time.

1 hour ago, Nascent said:

On the top 4. Fair chance it remains like it is now.

Melbourne, Brisbane, Collingwood, Geelong

 

Saints have the softest draw in the world. They could finish top 4 by virtue of beating nobody. 

 
2 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

I'd wager 12 with our % but I'm sure we will have more.

I think it's a pretty tight season.

Keen to hear other opinions.

9b87bb25-3ade-447a-acf5-962117267cff_tex

31 minutes ago, Beetle said:

9b87bb25-3ade-447a-acf5-962117267cff_tex

Now I’ve gotta go to bed with this in my head. 
 

Great. 


2 hours ago, Nascent said:

On the top 4. Fair chance it remains like it is now.

Melbourne, Brisbane, Collingwood, Geelong

 

And the South Australian filth ? Ross Lyon and his easy draw ?

3 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

I'd wager 12 with our % but I'm sure we will have more.

I think it's a pretty tight season.

Keen to hear other opinions.

Given there are now 23 games, 12 might not be enough to finish top 8 of 18. I'd say 13. Not sure about your comment on percentage. Clearly if we finish with 12 wins our percentage would drop a lot from where we are now, but I agree we do have a healthy percetage after 8 games compared to nost others. 

2 hours ago, Glorious Day said:

These four sides are a mile in front of the rest. Wouldn't be surprised if there ends up a significant difference between 4th and 5th - even 3 games. Ordering these sides right now is anyone's guess. It'll all come down to injuries and who has the healthiest list come finals time.

Can't see how you can say that Melbourne, Brisbane, Collingwood, Geelong are miles ahead of the rest. Collingwood had arguably a lucky win against Adelaide last week and against Esendon the week before. We had a close win today, lost to Essendon and could have lost against Richmond if they'd kicked straight. Geelong were shaky earlier in the season and lost to Gold Coast. I would agree these 4 look best at the moment but a long way to go and definitely not miiles ahead. 

3 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

Agreed but I don't think it's going to be easy. The blues look less of a threat and we play them twice. North and hawks too. At stretch id say we get 15 or 16. But I reckon 14 and % is top 4 the way the season is. 

We also play Richmond twice. And Swans though they may improve before the end of the season.

I think the thread should be a bit more optimistic, 'How many wins for top 4 or 2?', we are almost unbackable to be in the 8.

So anyway, 17 for 4, 18 for top 2.


9 hours ago, Glorious Day said:

These four sides are a mile in front of the rest. Wouldn't be surprised if there ends up a significant difference between 4th and 5th - even 3 games. Ordering these sides right now is anyone's guess. It'll all come down to injuries and who has the healthiest list come finals time.

A mile in front? 

We've lost to Essendon and were smashed by Brisbane up until the power went out. Our form has been pretty inconsistent from game to game and we were extremely lucky to win today in the end given 

Collingwood and Brisbane would easily account for us if we played them right now and our ladder position is not reflective of our form but rather our draw. 

Beat Carlton and Collingwood in a few weeks and I'll believe more. 

It's a long way to go cobba and I think your Melbourne glasses need to be taken off.. 

 

Edited by JimmyGadson

44 minutes ago, JimmyGadson said:

A mile in front? 

We've lost to Essendon and were smashed by Brisbane up until the power went out. Our form has been pretty inconsistent from game to game and we were extremely lucky to win today in the end given 

Collingwood and Brisbane would easily account for us if we played them right now and our ladder position is not reflective of our form but rather our draw. 

Beat Carlton and Collingwood in a few weeks and I'll believe more. 

It's a long way to go cobba and I think your Melbourne glasses need to be taken off.. 

 

beat Geelong, and ill believe 

We have a potential advantage over the top 4 sides as the fixture Gods have smiled on us this year; last year they smiled on Geelong.

We play 3 of the current bottom 4 sides twice:  Richmond, North and Hawks with 4 of those games yet to be played.  Brisbane, Geelong and Collingwood do not play any of them twice!!

Teams played twice:

  • Brisbane: Adelaide, Collingwood, Fremantle, Gold Coast, Melbourne, St Kilda
  • Collingwood: Adelaide, Brisbane, Carlton, Essendon, Geelong, Port Adelaide
  • Geelong: Collingwood, Essendon, Fremantle, Port Adelaide, Sydney, Western Bulldogs
  • Melbourne: Brisbane, Carlton, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Richmond, Sydney

There are no easy games as we learnt last night.

Never fear D'landers we will be top 2!!

Edited by Lucifers Hero

12 and 11 will see you spend September in Bali.

And with the dead beats down the bottom and no dominant teams soaking up all the wins up top - I can see 14 wins being what 8 finishes with. With percentage playing a big part in order of places toward the top of the ladder.

52 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

We have a potential advantage over the top 4 sides as the fixture Gods have smiled on us this year; last year they smiled was Geelong.

We play 3 of the current bottom 4 sides twice:  Richmond, North and Hawks with 4 of those games yet to be played.  Brisbane, Geelong and Collingwood do not play any of them twice!!

Teams played twice:

  • Brisbane: Adelaide, Collingwood, Fremantle, Gold Coast, Melbourne, St Kilda
  • Collingwood: Adelaide, Brisbane, Carlton, Essendon, Geelong, Port Adelaide
  • Geelong: Collingwood, Essendon, Fremantle, Port Adelaide, Sydney, Western Bulldogs
  • Melbourne: Brisbane, Carlton, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Richmond, Sydney

There are no easy games as we learnt last night.

Never fear D'landers we will be top 2!!

Wow that is quite an advantageous difference.


25 minutes ago, old55 said:

Wow that is quite an advantageous difference.

Had a quick look at the draw for other top 8 contenders,  Teams each plays twice:

  • Adelaide: Brisbane, Collingwood, Gold Coast, GWS, Port Adelaide, West Coast
  • Carlton: Collingwood, Gold Coast, GWS, Melbourne, St Kilda, West Coast
  • Essendon: Collingwood, Geelong, GWS, North Melbourne, Port Adelaide, West Coast
  • Port Adelaide: Adelaide, Collingwood, Essendon, Geelong, Richmond, Western Bulldogs
  • St Kilda: Brisbane, Carlton, Gold Coast, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Richmond
  • Sydney: Fremantle, Geelong, Gold Coast, GWS, Melbourne, Richmond
  • Western Bulldogs: Fremantle, Geelong, Hawthorn, GWS, Port Adelaide, Richmond

Similar to Geelong, Brisbane and Collingwood, those teams will have more 8-point games than Dees (and Saints) and their potential for big % boosts won't be as plentiful.

Short of major injuries or some other disaster I can't see us not making the top 4. 

I'm ok with top 4 especially as the other teams are likely to be Vic teams so our finals will be at the G - as long as we don't get an Away game vs Brisbane.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

11 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Had a quick look at the draw for other top 8 contenders,  Teams each plays twice:

  • Adelaide: Brisbane, Collingwood, Gold Coast, GWS, Port Adelaide, West Coast
  • Carlton: Collingwood, Gold Coast, GWS, Melbourne, St Kilda, West Coast
  • Essendon: Collingwood, Geelong, GWS, North Melbourne, Port Adelaide, West Coast
  • Port Adelaide: Adelaide, Collingwood, Essendon, Geelong, Richmond, Western Bulldogs
  • St Kilda: Brisbane, Carlton, Gold Coast, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Richmond
  • Sydney: Fremantle, Geelong, Gold Coast, GWS, Melbourne, Richmond
  • Western Bulldogs: Fremantle, Geelong, Hawthorn, GWS, Port Adelaide, Richmond

Similar to Geelong, Brisbane and Collingwood, those teams will have more 8-point games than Dees (and Saints) and their potential for big % boosts won't be as plentiful.

Short of major injuries or some other disaster I can't see us not making the top 4. 

I'm ok with top 4 especially as the other teams are likely to be Vic teams so our finals will be at the G - as long as we don't get an Away game vs Brisbane.

Thanks, great analysis. One update: North need an underline in the Essendon set.

16 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Had a quick look at the draw for other top 8 contenders,  Teams each plays twice:

  • Adelaide: Brisbane, Collingwood, Gold Coast, GWS, Port Adelaide, West Coast
  • Carlton: Collingwood, Gold Coast, GWS, Melbourne, St Kilda, West Coast
  • Essendon: Collingwood, Geelong, GWS, North Melbourne, Port Adelaide, West Coast
  • Port Adelaide: Adelaide, Collingwood, Essendon, Geelong, Richmond, Western Bulldogs
  • St Kilda: Brisbane, Carlton, Gold Coast, Hawthorn, North Melbourne, Richmond
  • Sydney: Fremantle, Geelong, Gold Coast, GWS, Melbourne, Richmond
  • Western Bulldogs: Fremantle, Geelong, Hawthorn, GWS, Port Adelaide, Richmond

Similar to Geelong, Brisbane and Collingwood, those teams will have more 8-point games than Dees (and Saints) and their potential for big % boosts won't be as plentiful.

Short of major injuries or some other disaster I can't see us not making the top 4. 

I'm ok with top 4 especially as the other teams are likely to be Vic teams so our finals will be at the G - as long as we don't get an Away game vs Brisbane.

Out of all those current top 8 teams, I'd say Port probably have the toughest double ups.

Could be bye bye Ken at the end of the season when they miss the 8. 

Alternatively if they make it, they could be either cooked through fighting so hard just to make it or one of the better sides in the bottom half of the 8.

 
12 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Forget finals. Don’t finish top 4 and get a home final and we are cooked. 
We need 16 wins minimum IMO to give the flag a shake. 

Add to that being in good form and a fit list hitting first week of finals so we get a repeat of 2021 and not 2022.

16 minutes ago, old55 said:

Thanks, great analysis. One update: North need an underline in the Essendon set.

Thanks.  Updated.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 224 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies