Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

 

Woeful display by senior footballers except Harmes

Edited by jayceebee31

2 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

free kicks now killing us not to mention the bad goal kicking

...and the field kicking which has cost us time and again.

 


7 minutes ago, KC from Casey said:

Brown kicks his fourth behind.

You could not possibly play him in the seniors on that performance, nor Tom.

Our key forward stocks are looking very thin atm.

  • Author

Casey Demons lose their first game for the season.

CASEY DEMONS 2.4.16 2.9.21 8.13.61 11.16.82

RICHMOND VFL 1.2.8 7.3.45 12.4.76 14.10.94 

GOALS

CASEY DEMONS Harmes 3 Dunstan Edwards 2 Grey Jefferson McDonald Valentine

RICHMOND VFL Melville Nathan 3 Ross 2 Bilston-McGillen Faimalo Hicks McDonagh May Olden

BEST 

CASEY DEMONS Dunstan Harmes Turner Howes Edwards Woewoedin 

RICHMOND VFL Ross McDonagh Trezise Bracher Teal Olden

Statistics 

Jed Adams 5 kicks 2 handballs 7 disposals 4 marks 28 dream team points
Jack Bell 5 kicks 3 handballs 8 disposals 3 marks 2 tackles 25 hit outs 54 dream team points
Ben Brown 4 behinds 7 kicks 5 handballs 12 disposals 6 marks 1 tackles 51 dream team points
Luke Dunstan 2 goals 20 kicks 20 handballs 40 disposals 12 marks 4 tackles 162 dream team points
Tyler Edwards 2 goals 11 kicks 3 handballs 14 disposals 3 marks 3 tackles 66 dream team points
Kyah Ferris-White 2 handballs 2 disposals 12 hit outs 11 dream team points
Max Gregory 3 kicks 6 handballs 9 disposals 21 dream team points
George Grey 1 goal 10 kicks 5 handballs 15 disposals 2 marks 2 tackles 62 dream team points
James Harmes 3 goals 10 kicks 19 handballs 29 disposals 6 marks 3 tackles 113 dream team points
Blake Howes 8 kicks 8 handballs 16 disposals 5 marks 5 tackles 72 dream team points
Matt Jefferson 1 goal 1 behind 3 kicks 1 handballs 4 disposals 2 marks 1 tackle 28 dream team points
Tom McDonald 1 goal 3 behinds 11 kicks 3 handballs 14 disposals 3 marks 9 hit outs 60 dream team points 
Andy Moniz-Wakefield 6 kicks 5 handballs 11 disposals 3 tackles 40 dream team points
Harvey Neocleous 2 kicks 5 handballs 7 disposals 2 marks 3 tackles 31 dream team points
Oliver Sestan 1 behind 9 kicks 1 handballs 10 disposals 4 marks 37 dream team points
Miles Shepherd 5 kicks 3 handballs 8 disposals  2 marks 27 dream team points
Cooper Simpson 2 kicks 5 handballs 7 disposals 1 mark 19 dream team points
Deaykin Smith 7 kicks 5 handballs 12 disposals 3 marks 37 dream team points
Roan Steele 1 behind 6 kicks 5 handballs 11 disposals 2 marks 2 tackles 42 dream team points
Adam Tomlinson 11 kicks 4 handballs 15 disposals 4 marks 53 dream team points
Daniel Turner 13 kicks 5 handballs 18 disposals  8 marks 2 tackles 80 dream team points
Ryan Valentine 1 goal 3 behinds 6 kicks 6 disposals 5 marks 1 tackle 2 hit outs 49 dream team points
Taj Woewodin 1 behind 11 kicks 8 handballs 19 disposals 2 marks 2 tackles 64 dream team points

1 minute ago, jayceebee31 said:

Woeful display by senior footballers 

Dunstan and Harmes were excellent.

The rest, oh dear. 

Just now, Redleg said:

You could not possibly play him in the seniors on that performance, nor Tom.

Our key forward stocks are looking very thin atm.

Agree, and it also showed why we can't play both in the same team at senior level.


24 minutes ago, Nascent said:

For all the good things Harmes has done, he's had some equally poor tackling efforts and almost non-existent second efforts.

 

3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Dunstan and Harmes were excellent.

The rest, oh dear. 

I think Harmes picked and chose when to go a bit a times, but he was pretty good on the whole.

Edited by rjay

We really missed those hard bodied and experienced VFL players, Munro, Buntine, and Baldi.

Wow, BBB not taking his opportunity from straight out infront, though not the only one.

We have a few AFL listed players who will have to lift/develop their game, if they want to be AFL standard. Jefferson, Adams, AMW, D.Smith, Farris-White. 

Some terrible field kicking and missed opportunities killed us.

Nearly stole it.

Edited by kev martin

5 minutes ago, rjay said:

 

I think Harmes picked and chose when to go a bit a times, but he was pretty good on the whole.

Agreed, did more right than wrong and was one of our better players.

Was going to say there is a big gap between vfl and afl but then remembered how we played last week at gather round….


11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Dunstan and Harmes were excellent.

The rest, oh dear. 

Yes they were the better of a bad bunch today I give you that, but excellent no

Thanks KC and all posters very disappointing day for Casey I think that the 2.9 first half really killed us. You can’t doubt Dunstan’s endeavour and a lot had a crack including Harmes, Turner, Woey, Bell but I agree where were our other AFL listed players, they are playing for their futures and we are going to have to make way for a new lot of kids at the end of 2023.!!!

played with no system the whole game

gaping holes and bad decision making everywhere, not to mention horrible disposal

just hope it's a one-off

 
16 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Dunstan and Harmes were excellent.

The rest, oh dear. 

Thought Turner was outstanding all game.

Edited by Nascent

8 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Was going to say there is a big gap between vfl and afl but then remembered how we played last week at gather round….

If Melbourne puts the same application in tomorrow night as most of their counterparts at Casey, we’ll be moaning about a similar outcome. That was poor today. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 30 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 241 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 47 replies