Stats Files - 2023

[Binmans PA 26,292]

20 scoring shots from turnover. That is huge!

Love it, Wheelo. 👌

[Binmans PA 26,292]

Just on scores from ball ups, how is that measured exactly? Because Crisp's goal in the 1st and Daicos' goal in the 4th were both from ball ups.

[Watson11 1,910]

6 hours ago, A F said:

Just on scores from ball ups, how is that measured exactly? Because Crisp's goal in the 1st and Daicos' goal in the 4th were both from ball ups.

Crisp’s was from a boundary throw in.

[WheeloRatings 961]

Melbourne v Collingwood

Pressure

Q1: 176 - 180
Q2: 174 - 172
Q3: 201 - 206
Q4: 186 - 177
Tot: 183 - 186

Most Pressure Points

(Weighed sum of pressure acts. Physical pressure acts are worth 3.75 points, closing acts are worth 2.25 points, chasing acts are 1.5 points and corralling are 1.2. https://www.championdata.com/glossary/afl/)

Petracca: 74
Viney: 65
Neal-Bullen: 59
Pickett: 43
Sparrow: 40
Chandler: 40
Langdon: 40
van Rooyen: 37
Brayshaw: 33

Time in forward half

58% - 42%

Here are my calculations (not official) for time in forward half for each quarter:

Q1: 55% - 45%
Q2: 50% - 50%
Q3: 66% - 34%
Q4: 63% - 37%

Expected Scores

84 - 64

[binman 38,765]

Diff expected score than from here:

[layzie 29,162]

Time in forward half is the key one for me. 

Edited June 12, 2023 by layzie

[WheeloRatings 961]

8 minutes ago, binman said:

Diff expected score than from here:

Your post is missing the link to the expected scores.

[Binmans PA 26,292]

47 minutes ago, Watson11 said:

Crisp’s was from a boundary throw in.

I've got a great memory, don't I? :P

Interesting on the third quarter pressure rating. That surprises me.

[binman 38,765]

2 hours ago, WheeloRatings said:

Your post is missing the link to the expected scores.

Couldn't find it

[Demon Dynasty 15,699]

13 hours ago, WheeloRatings said:

Melbourne v Collingwood

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20231308

Note: first number below is Melbourne, higher value is bold.

Pressure

Not available until tomorrow.

Q1: ? - ?
Q2: ? - ?
Q3: ? - ?
Q4: ? - ?
Tot: ? - ?

Most Pressure Points

(Weighed sum of pressure acts. Physical pressure acts are worth 3.75 points, closing acts are worth 2.25 points, chasing acts are 1.5 points and corralling are 1.2. https://www.championdata.com/glossary/afl/)

Not available until tomorrow.

Time in forward half

Not available until tomorrow.

Here are my calculations (not official) for time in forward half for each quarter:

Q1: 55% - 45%
Q2: 50% - 50%
Q3: 66% - 34%
Q4: 63% - 37%

Score sources

Centre bounce
2.0.12 - 0.0.0

Ball up
0.4.4 - 1.1.7

Throw in
0.0.0 - 1.0.6

Turnover
6.14.50 - 7.7.49

Kick-in
0.0.0 - 0.0.0

Shots at goal

Set position
7.10.52 - 3.4.22

General play
1.4.10 - 6.2.38

Expected Scores

Not available until tomorrow.

Centre Bounce Attendances

Ruck Contests

Hit outs

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.	To Adv. % (2023)	To Adv. % (2022)
Brodie Grundy	42	26	5	33.2	30.2
Max Gawn	37	17	6	31.0	33.6
Jacob van Rooyen	5	3	0	16.0
Tom McDonald				25.0	33.3
Harrison Petty				22.2
Ben Brown				0.0	14.3
Josh Schache					33.3

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_stats.html

Thanks WO.  You wouldn't have hit outs to adv from yesterday for the Pies by any chance?

[WheeloRatings 961]

1 hour ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Thanks WO.  You wouldn't have hit outs to adv from yesterday for the Pies by any chance?

I can get the Pies hit outs to advantage. Would you like Melbourne's opponents' HO to advantage each week from now on?

1 hour ago, binman said:

Couldn't find it

There are a few sources for expected scores - the figures I quoted are from the Herald Sun which are provided by Champion Data. They would be the most reliable as they capture the pressure on the player at the time of the kick. The AFLxScore and crow_data_sci twitter profiles both calculate Expected Scores based on the information available to them, which only use a proxy for pressure as the pressure information is not available to them.

For example, you can use the fact that a player won a contested possession as a proxy for the amount of pressure they were under, but it won't accurately reflect the pressure they were under when they kicked the ball, only when they gained possession. A player could get an uncontested possession, then run into traffic and kick for goal under pressure. CD would rate this as a more difficult kick than AFLxScore.

Edited June 13, 2023 by WheeloRatings

[Demon Dynasty 15,699]

16 minutes ago, WheeloRatings said:

I can get the Pies hit outs to advantage. Would you like Melbourne's opponents' HO to advantage each week from now on?

If it involves a bit of extra work no need

I'll only look to post Oppo player ratings if it's a big top liner opponent like the Pies this week.

So will only be occasionally on request if that's easier for you.

[binman 38,765]

20 minutes ago, WheeloRatings said:

I can get the Pies hit outs to advantage. Would you like Melbourne's opponents' HO to advantage each week from now on?

There are a few sources for expected scores - the figures I quoted are from the Herald Sun which are provided by Champion Data. They would be the most reliable as they capture the pressure on the player at the time of the kick. The AFLxScore and crow_data_sci twitter profiles both calculate Expected Scores based on the information available to them, which only use a proxy for pressure as the pressure information is not available to them.

For example, you can use the fact that a player won a contested possession as a proxy for the amount of pressure they were under, but it won't accurately reflect the pressure they were under when they kicked the ball, only when they gained possession. A player could get an uncontested possession, then run into traffic and kick for goal under pressure. CD would rate this as a more difficult kick than AFLxScore.

Thanks wheelo - makes sense.

But for the purposes of my over under competion (that i was the only competitor in), i'm using them just this once because they make my prediction look really good. 

[WheeloRatings 961]

14 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

If it involves a bit of extra work no need

I'll only look to post Oppo player ratings if it's a big top liner opponent like the Pies this week.

So will only be occasionally on request if that's easier for you.

I'm going to try to automate these posts as much as possible, so I should be able to quite easily incorporate the opponents' HO to advantage each week with no ongoing effort.

[WheeloRatings 961]

5 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

If it involves a bit of extra work no need

I'll only look to post Oppo player ratings if it's a big top liner opponent like the Pies this week.

So will only be occasionally on request if that's easier for you.

 

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.
Darcy Cameron	60	13	1
Mason Cox	24	12	3

[ArtificialWisdom 3,888]

21 hours ago, WheeloRatings said:

Ball up
0.4.4 - 1.1.7

Throw in
0.0.0 - 1.0.6

We know both of these goals were from defensive 50 stoppages. Given our shocking record in that statistic has been a talking point this year do you have an easy way to note that going forward, will be interesting to see if improves over the back half of the season.  

[binman 38,765]

1 hour ago, WheeloRatings said:

 

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.
Darcy Cameron	60	13	1
Mason Cox	24	12	3

The pies only had four hitouts to advantage?

That's nuts.

Hard to get territory if you can't hit to your own players.

There's only so many oppo ruck taps teams can shark.

On that, my sense is we were better at ensuring the blues and pies couldn't shark our rack taps.

We gave up a few of them against port and freo - and rhe hawks for that matter too.

[Binmans PA 26,292]

3 minutes ago, binman said:

The pies only had four hitouts to advantage?

That's nuts.

Hard to get territory if you can't hit to your own players.

There's only so many oppo ruck taps teams can shark.

On that, my sense is we were better at ensuring the blues and pies couldn't shark our rack taps.

We gave up a few of them against port and freo - and rhe hawks for that matter too.

It seemed to the eye that much of the time in the past fortnight, Max was rucking more like Grundy, and that is to drop it at the foot of the contest.

I reckon Yze (and or Stafford - has he still got the rucks as well as forwards?) should get a fair bit of credit for our midfield work in the last fortnight too. Really good stuff considering Clarry's absence.

[Demon Dynasty 15,699]

Round 13, 2023 MCG - Demons vs Magpies

Team rating was 13% off last season's Rating and 9% off this season's average.  The effect of a long half season and quality of the opposition i suspect.  Clarry out takes something off also.  Or are both teams' form coming off the boil a little?  Best guess most likely the former.

The two team ratings appearing to reflect what a close match this was (scoreboard wise).  Add 4 to 6 goals for us if we happened to have kicked 'ok' and our rating would've jumped ahead somewhat.

What a game from Captain courageous, oops i mean Vice Captain courageous!   Oh bugger he's just one bloody courageous champ is our Jack.

His second time taking out the No.1 mantle so far this season.  His other was Anzac eve vs the Tigers in Rnd 6 with a 5.400

His best rating since Rnd 9 2022 vs the Eagles where he posted a 6.550

22 effectives @ 69%, 9 clearances (most on the day), 1 rebound, 6 i50s, 11 tackles (equal best with Crisp) including 3 inside 50 (2nd most of either team to ANB with 4), 7 score involvements (equal best alongside Fritsch & Crisp), 481 meters gained, 1 goal and just 4 turnovers.

Vintage Salem & Hibberd in this match and Tomo also very impressive for mine.

Very low rating for Hibbo which is so far away from what he achieved on the day.  He was rock solid and this rating in no way reflects the value he brought imv and an indication of the game's nuances that need to be seen in person and/or on the box to appreciate.

The two concerns in these results... Kozzy posting a consecutive super low result.  Last week 0.800 against the Blues.  Neither were his lowest this season however, which was Anzac eve with a 0.550  Not sure what happened to the form he showed in Rnd 1.

The other is Spargo.  His average rating prior to his concussion was 2.131 which was approx 7% up on his 2022 rating.  Post concussion he's played 4.5 matches for an average rating of 1.944   That's 8.8% off the pre concussion average.  However still only marginally off his 2022 average by only 2%.  Wonder if he's still having some issues post concussion?

Top 5 Meters Gained (both teams):  Hunter 610, Maynard 569, Viney & Crisp 481 and Noble 455.

Demons

Scoring Efficiency
Disposals Per Goal	44.12
% In50s Goal	13.60
Conversion %	30.80

Same Goals as a % of Inside 50s as the previous match against the Blues!  The two lowest results for the season.  Our average prior to the last two matches approx 26%.  A 50% drop off.  The buy arriving just in time for some much needed respite?

Player	Rating	Rank
J Viney	6.125	1
C Salem	4.850	2
A Brayshaw	3.775	3
T Rivers	3.675	4
M Gawn	3.650	5
C Petracca	3.625	6
A Tomlinson	3.200	7
T Sparrow	3.100	8
B Grundy	2.850	9
S May	2.750	10
L Hunter	2.700	11
K Chandler	2.375	12
A N-Bullen	2.325	13
J Lever	2.200	14
J Smith	2.175	15
J McVee	2.025	16
B Fritsch	1.775	17
E Langdon	1.525	18
J Jordon > 24%	1.400	19
J V Rooyen	1.350	20
C Spargo < 52%	1.200	21
M Hibberd	1.200	21
K Pickett	0.875	23
Team Rating	59.85
Top 6	25.70
Bottom 6	8.45

Magpies Scoring Efficiency
Disposals Per Goal	40.56
% In50s Goal	18.40
Conversion %	52.90

Player	Rating	Rank
T Mitchell	4.825	1
J Crisp	4.625	2
N Daicos	4.350	3
T Adams	4.300	4
B Maynard	3.800	5
D Cameron	3.425	6
D Moore	3.250	7
B Frampton	3.175	8
S Pendlebury	3.100	9
H Harrison	2.950	10
I Quaynor	2.925	11
J Daicos	2.350	12
J Noble	2.175	13
P Lipinski	2.125	14
M Cox	2.050	15
B Hill	1.850	16
B Mihocek	1.850	16
N Murphy	1.825	18
W H-Elliott	1.625	19
B McCreery	1.525	20
O Markov > 30%	1.050	21
R McInnes	0.125	22
A Johnson < 54%	0.050	23
Team Rating	59.28
Top 6	25.33
Bottom 6	8.00

< Subbed out / TOG %

> Subbed in / TOG %

Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

Edited June 13, 2023 by Demon Dynasty

[WheeloRatings 961]

1 hour ago, ArtificialWisdom said:

We know both of these goals were from defensive 50 stoppages. Given our shocking record in that statistic has been a talking point this year do you have an easy way to note that going forward, will be interesting to see if improves over the back half of the season.  

Yes, that is something I'm looking at and will try to incorporate it into the Stats Files update in the future.

[binman 38,765]

1 hour ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Round 13, 2023 MCG - Demons vs Magpies

Team rating was 13% off last season's Rating and 9% off this season's average.  The effect of a long half season and quality of the opposition i suspect.  Clarry out takes something off also.  Or are both teams' form coming off the boil a little?  Best guess most likely the former.

The two team ratings appearing to reflect what a close match this was (scoreboard wise).  Add 4 to 6 goals for us if we happened to have kicked 'ok' and our rating would've jumped ahead somewhat.

What a game from Captain courageous, oops i mean Vice Captain courageous!   Oh bugger he's just one bloody courageous champ is our Jack.

His second time taking out the No.1 mantle so far this season.  His other was Anzac eve vs the Tigers in Rnd 6 with a 5.400

His best rating since Rnd 9 2022 vs the Eagles where he posted a 6.550

22 effectives @ 69%, 9 clearances (most on the day), 1 rebound, 6 i50s, 11 tackles (equal best with Crisp) including 3 inside 50 (2nd most of either team to ANB with 4), 7 score involvements (equal best alongside Fritsch & Crisp), 481 meters gained, 1 goal and just 4 turnovers.

Vintage Salem & Hibberd in this match and Tomo also very impressive for mine.

Very low rating for Hibbo which is so far away from what he achieved on the day.  He was rock solid and this rating in no way reflects the value he brought imv and an indication of the game's nuances that need to be seen in person and/or on the box to appreciate.

The two concerns in these results... Kozzy posting a consecutive super low result.  Last week 0.800 against the Blues.  Neither were his lowest this season however, which was Anzac eve with a 0.550  Not sure what happened to the form he showed in Rnd 1.

The other is Spargo.  His average rating prior to his concussion was 2.131 which was approx 7% up on his 2022 rating.  Post concussion he's played 4.5 matches for an average rating of 1.944   That's 8.8% off the pre concussion average.  However still only marginally off his 2022 average by only 2%.  Wonder if he's still having some issues post concussion?

Top 5 Meters Gained (both teams):  Hunter 610, Maynard 569, Viney & Crisp 481 and Noble 455.

Demons

Scoring Efficiency
Disposals Per Goal	44.12
% In50s Goal	13.60
Conversion %	30.80

Same Goals as a % of Inside 50s as the previous match against the Blues!  The two lowest results for the season.  Our average prior to the last two matches approx 26%.  A 50% drop off.  The buy arriving just in time for some much needed respite?

Player	Rating	Rank
J Viney	6.125	1
C Salem	4.850	2
A Brayshaw	3.775	3
T Rivers	3.675	4
M Gawn	3.650	5
C Petracca	3.625	6
A Tomlinson	3.200	7
T Sparrow	3.100	8
B Grundy	2.850	9
S May	2.750	10
L Hunter	2.700	11
K Chandler	2.375	12
A N-Bullen	2.325	13
J Lever	2.200	14
J Smith	2.175	15
J McVee	2.025	16
B Fritsch	1.775	17
E Langdon	1.525	18
J Jordon > 24%	1.400	19
J V Rooyen	1.350	20
C Spargo < 52%	1.200	21
M Hibberd	1.200	21
K Pickett	0.875	23
Team Rating	59.85
Top 6	25.70
Bottom 6	8.45

Magpies Scoring Efficiency
Disposals Per Goal	40.56
% In50s Goal	18.40
Conversion %	52.90

Player	Rating	Rank
T Mitchell	4.825	1
J Crisp	4.625	2
N Daicos	4.350	3
T Adams	4.300	4
B Maynard	3.800	5
D Cameron	3.425	6
D Moore	3.250	7
B Frampton	3.175	8
S Pendlebury	3.100	9
H Harrison	2.950	10
I Quaynor	2.925	11
J Daicos	2.350	12
J Noble	2.175	13
P Lipinski	2.125	14
M Cox	2.050	15
B Hill	1.850	16
B Mihocek	1.850	16
N Murphy	1.825	18
W H-Elliott	1.625	19
B McCreery	1.525	20
O Markov > 30%	1.050	21
R McInnes	0.125	22
A Johnson < 54%	0.050	23
Team Rating	59.28
Top 6	25.33
Bottom 6	8.00

< Subbed out / TOG %

> Subbed in / TOG %

Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

DD, I reckon a more useful stat to compare scoring efficiency accross games than % of inside 50s Goals is % In50s scoring shots.

Set shots accuracy can throw up anomalous results, not just missing heaps but a run of unsustainable accuracy like the pies kicking seven goals straight before registering their first miss the last time we played them.

 

Edited June 13, 2023 by binman

[Demon Dynasty 15,699]

Team & Player Ratings to Rnd 13, 2023 vs H&A Season 2022

Player	2023 Rating	2023 Rank	2022 Rating	% Change vs 2022	2022 Rank	Change in Rank vs 2022
C Oliver	5.285	1	5.320	-0.66	1	0
C Petracca	4.767	2	4.456	6.98	2	0
A Brayshaw	3.817	3	3.839	-0.57	5	2
J Jordon >	3.734	4	3.164	18.02	9	5
Jack Viney	3.729	5	3.971	-6.09	3	-2
T Rivers <	3.664	6	2.423	51.22	18	12
C Salem	3.350	7	3.363	-0.39	7	0
Max Gawn	3.208	8	3.643	-11.94	8	0
Steven May	3.202	9	3.971	-19.37	3	-6
B Grundy	3.171	10	-	-	-	-
T Sparrow	3.085	11	2.665	15.76	16	5
Jake Bowey <	3.078	12	2.856	7.77	13	1
L Hunter	2.996	13	-	-	-	-
Ed Langdon	2.983	14	3.109	-4.05	11	-3
A Tomlinson	2.965	15	2.079	42.62	22	7
Jake Lever	2.954	16	2.703	9.29	14	-2
J Harmes >	2.938	17	3.082	-4.67	12	-5
A N-Bullen	2.721	18	2.688	1.23	15	-3
M Hibberd <	2.641	19	2.613	1.07	17	-2
K Chandler <	2.464	20	-	-	-	-
H Petty <	2.432	21	2.392	1.67	19	-2
K Pickett	2.386	22	2.118	12.65	21	-1
B Fritsch	2.269	23	1.936	17.20	27	4
J V Rooyen	2.234	24	-	-	-	-
Judd McVee	2.204	25	-	-	-	-
T McDonald	2.054	26	1.967	4.42	26	0
Ben Brown <	2.033	27	1.762	15.38	29	2
C Spargo <	1.935	28	1.981	-2.32	24	-4
Joel Smith *	1.663	29	2.239	-25.73	20	-9
J Melksham >	1.437	30	1.947	-26.19	25	-5
J Schache *	1.375	31	-	-	-	-
B Laurie < > *	1.300	32	-	-	-	-
D Turner < *	1.075	33	-	-	-	-
Team Rating	59.80		65.90	-9.26

* Played less than two full matches (in total)

< Subbed Out at least once or more

> Subbed In at least once or more

Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

[WheeloRatings 961]

Melbourne v Geelong (Round 15, 2023)

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20231501

Key Team Stats

Stats highlighted purple were won by Melbourne.

Stat	For	Against	Diff
Disposal Efficiency	66.6	61.7	+4.9
Kicking Efficiency	58.5	53.2	+5.3
Metres Gained	6206	6104	+102
Inside 50s	52	53	-1
Shots At Goal	22	26	-4
Shots Per Inside 50	42.3	49.1	-6.7
Contested Possessions	160	149	+11
Ground Ball Gets	106	104	+2
Intercepts	91	96	-5
Intercept Marks	23	19	+4
Centre Clearances	9	11	-2
Stoppage Clearances	38	24	+14
Contested Marks	10	12	-2
Marks Inside 50	8	12	-4
Hitouts	47	31	+16
Hitouts To Advantage	14	4	+10
Tackles	75	70	+5
Tackles Inside 50	19	8	+11
Def One On One Loss %	20.0	5.6	+14.4

Pressure

Team pressure

Quarter	For	Against
1	183	206
2	224	175
3	214	197
4	163	204
Match	196	196

Source: Herald Sun

Most Pressure Points

Note: pressure points are the weighed sum of pressure acts. Physical pressure acts are worth 3.75 points, closing acts are worth 2.25 points, chasing acts are 1.5 points and corralling are 1.2. ( https://www.championdata.com/glossary/afl/ )

Player	Pressure Acts	Pressure Points	Season Average*
Christian Petracca	24	62	50.0
Jack Viney	23	54	52.8
Alex Neal-Bullen	20	51	49.1
Ed Langdon	26	50	28.2
Angus Brayshaw	24	50	26.6
Kysaiah Pickett	18	44	41.7
Christian Salem	20	39	31.8
Kade Chandler	17	37	32.7
Bayley Fritsch	15	37	20.4
Tom Sparrow	15	33	45.3
Lachie Hunter	14	32	23.5
Joel Smith	12	31	22.7
James Jordon	13	30	18.7
Trent Rivers	13	28	24.1
Judd McVee	12	26	19.4
Max Gawn	9	23	22.5
Jacob van Rooyen	10	22	24.8
Steven May	8	20	14.2
Harrison Petty	7	18	21.2
Michael Hibberd	6	16	12.2
Brodie Grundy	5	11	26.9
Charlie Spargo	4	9	23.9
Jake Lever	4	7	12.6

* Pressure points for rounds 4 and 6 have not been able to be sourced from the Herald Sun. Pressure points for these matches have been estimated from the number of pressure acts for each player.

Source: Herald Sun

Time in Forward Half

Quarter	For	Against
1	42%	58%
2	67%	33%
3	50%	50%
4	50%	50%
Match	55%	45%

Source: Match total sourced from the Herald Sun; quarterly values are my own calculations.

Score Sources

Summary

Score sources highlighted purple were won by Melbourne.

Category	For			Against			Diff
	G	B	T	G	B	T
Kick-in	0	0	0	0	0	0	+0
Centre Bounce	0	1	1	0	2	2	-1
Stoppage (Other)	4	6	30	3	1	19	+11
Turnover	4	8	32	8	9	57	-25

Category	For		Against
	Match	Season	Match	Season
Kick-in	0	3.1	0	2.8
Centre Bounce	1	11.1	2	7.6
Stoppage (Other)	30	22.6	19	22.8
Turnover	32	56.1	57	39.3

Chain start region

Note: region is from the scoring team's perspective. Against season average represents average points conceded by Melbourne across the season, not average points scored by Geelong.

Category	Region	For		Against
		Match	Season	Match	Season
Kick-in	D50	0	3.1	0	2.8
Centre Bounce	Centre	1	11.1	2	7.6
Stoppage (Other)	D50	0	0.4	6	2.3
Stoppage (Other)	Centre	0	2.9	0	1.0
Stoppage (Other)	Wing	19	11.3	7	6.6
Stoppage (Other)	F50	11	7.9	6	12.9
Turnover	D50	1	10.9	13	5.4
Turnover	Centre	1	8.8	18	5.8
Turnover	Wing	28	30.1	16	19.9
Turnover	F50	2	6.3	10	8.2

Region	For		Against
	Match	Season	Match	Season
Centre	2	22.8	20	14.4
D50	1	14.5	19	10.5
F50	13	14.2	16	21.1
Wing	47	41.4	23	26.5

Shots at goal

Team	Shots	G	B	T	Acc.
General Play
Melbourne	14	4	8	32	28.6
Geelong	12	5	6	36	41.7
Set Position
Melbourne	8	4	2	26	50.0
Geelong	14	6	4	40	42.9

Centre Bounce Attendances

	CBAs	CBA %	2023 %	2022 %
Jack Viney	20	87	68.5	74.6
Christian Petracca	20	87	65.9	74.6
Max Gawn	15	65	47.0	65.5
Angus Brayshaw	13	57	16.1	16.0
Tom Sparrow	12	52	47.8	32.2
Brodie Grundy	8	35	57.1	83.7
James Jordon	3	13	19.0	0.2
Trent Rivers	1	4	4.5	0.0
Kysaiah Pickett	0	0	12.9	1.3
Jacob van Rooyen	0	0	5.3
Alex Neal-Bullen	0	0	3.7	3.5
Harrison Petty	0	0	1.2	0.0
Clayton Oliver			82.8	86.5
James Harmes			28.7	14.6
Tom McDonald			5.4	0.0
Josh Schache			0.0	13.8

Ruck Contests and Hitouts

Ruck Contests

	Ruck Contests	RC %	2023 %	2022 %
Max Gawn	48	45	43.1	57.8
Brodie Grundy	42	40	50.5	77.4
Jacob van Rooyen	15	14	9.6
Steven May	1	1	0.1	0.0
Harrison Petty	0	0	2.7	0.0
Christian Petracca	0	0	0.1	0.1
Tom McDonald			8.9	7.0
Josh Schache			6.7	13.4
Ben Brown			3.8	3.6
Clayton Oliver			0.0	0.0

Hitouts

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.	To Adv. % (2023)	To Adv. % (2022)
Max Gawn	48	23	8	31.4	33.6
Brodie Grundy	42	19	5	32.8	30.2
Jacob van Rooyen	15	5	1	16.7
Harrison Petty	0	0	0	22.2
Tom McDonald				25.0	33.3
Ben Brown				0.0	14.3
Josh Schache					33.3

Opposition hitouts

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.
Rhys Stanley	85	26	3
Mark Blicavs	12	3	1
Tom Hawkins	9	2	0

[Kent 2,604]

12 minutes ago, WheeloRatings said:

Melbourne v Geelong (Round 15, 2023)

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20231501

Key Team Stats

Stats highlighted purple were won by Melbourne.

Stat	For	Against	Diff
Disposal Efficiency	66.6	61.7	+4.9
Kicking Efficiency	58.5	53.2	+5.3
Metres Gained	6206	6104	+102
Inside 50s	52	53	-1
Shots At Goal	22	26	-4
Shots Per Inside 50	42.3	49.1	-6.7
Contested Possessions	160	149	+11
Ground Ball Gets	106	104	+2
Intercepts	91	96	-5
Intercept Marks	23	19	+4
Centre Clearances	9	11	-2
Stoppage Clearances	38	24	+14
Contested Marks	10	12	-2
Marks Inside 50	8	12	-4
Hitouts	47	31	+16
Hitouts To Advantage	14	4	+10
Tackles	75	70	+5
Tackles Inside 50	19	8	+11
Def One On One Loss %	20.0	5.6	+14.4

Pressure

Team pressure

Quarter	For	Against
1	183	206
2	224	175
3	214	197
4	163	204
Match	196	196

Source: Herald Sun

Most Pressure Points

Note: pressure points are the weighed sum of pressure acts. Physical pressure acts are worth 3.75 points, closing acts are worth 2.25 points, chasing acts are 1.5 points and corralling are 1.2. ( https://www.championdata.com/glossary/afl/ )

Player	Pressure Acts	Pressure Points	Season Average*
Christian Petracca	24	62	50.0
Jack Viney	23	54	52.8
Alex Neal-Bullen	20	51	49.1
Ed Langdon	26	50	28.2
Angus Brayshaw	24	50	26.6
Kysaiah Pickett	18	44	41.7
Christian Salem	20	39	31.8
Kade Chandler	17	37	32.7
Bayley Fritsch	15	37	20.4
Tom Sparrow	15	33	45.3
Lachie Hunter	14	32	23.5
Joel Smith	12	31	22.7
James Jordon	13	30	18.7
Trent Rivers	13	28	24.1
Judd McVee	12	26	19.4
Max Gawn	9	23	22.5
Jacob van Rooyen	10	22	24.8
Steven May	8	20	14.2
Harrison Petty	7	18	21.2
Michael Hibberd	6	16	12.2
Brodie Grundy	5	11	26.9
Charlie Spargo	4	9	23.9
Jake Lever	4	7	12.6

* Pressure points for rounds 4 and 6 have not been able to be sourced from the Herald Sun. Pressure points for these matches have been estimated from the number of pressure acts for each player.

Source: Herald Sun

Time in Forward Half

Quarter	For	Against
1	42%	58%
2	67%	33%
3	50%	50%
4	50%	50%
Match	55%	45%

Source: Match total sourced from the Herald Sun; quarterly values are my own calculations.

Score Sources

Summary

Score sources highlighted purple were won by Melbourne.

Category	For			Against			Diff
	G	B	T	G	B	T
Kick-in	0	0	0	0	0	0	+0
Centre Bounce	0	1	1	0	2	2	-1
Stoppage (Other)	4	6	30	3	1	19	+11
Turnover	4	8	32	8	9	57	-25

Category	For		Against
	Match	Season	Match	Season
Kick-in	0	3.1	0	2.8
Centre Bounce	1	11.1	2	7.6
Stoppage (Other)	30	22.6	19	22.8
Turnover	32	56.1	57	39.3

Chain start region

Note: region is from the scoring team's perspective. Against season average represents average points conceded by Melbourne across the season, not average points scored by Geelong.

Category	Region	For		Against
		Match	Season	Match	Season
Kick-in	D50	0	3.1	0	2.8
Centre Bounce	Centre	1	11.1	2	7.6
Stoppage (Other)	D50	0	0.4	6	2.3
Stoppage (Other)	Centre	0	2.9	0	1.0
Stoppage (Other)	Wing	19	11.3	7	6.6
Stoppage (Other)	F50	11	7.9	6	12.9
Turnover	D50	1	10.9	13	5.4
Turnover	Centre	1	8.8	18	5.8
Turnover	Wing	28	30.1	16	19.9
Turnover	F50	2	6.3	10	8.2

Region	For		Against
	Match	Season	Match	Season
Centre	2	22.8	20	14.4
D50	1	14.5	19	10.5
F50	13	14.2	16	21.1
Wing	47	41.4	23	26.5

Shots at goal

Team	Shots	G	B	T	Acc.
General Play
Melbourne	14	4	8	32	28.6
Geelong	12	5	6	36	41.7
Set Position
Melbourne	8	4	2	26	50.0
Geelong	14	6	4	40	42.9

Centre Bounce Attendances

	CBAs	CBA %	2023 %	2022 %
Jack Viney	20	87	68.5	74.6
Christian Petracca	20	87	65.9	74.6
Max Gawn	15	65	47.0	65.5
Angus Brayshaw	13	57	16.1	16.0
Tom Sparrow	12	52	47.8	32.2
Brodie Grundy	8	35	57.1	83.7
James Jordon	3	13	19.0	0.2
Trent Rivers	1	4	4.5	0.0
Kysaiah Pickett	0	0	12.9	1.3
Jacob van Rooyen	0	0	5.3
Alex Neal-Bullen	0	0	3.7	3.5
Harrison Petty	0	0	1.2	0.0
Clayton Oliver			82.8	86.5
James Harmes			28.7	14.6
Tom McDonald			5.4	0.0
Josh Schache			0.0	13.8

Ruck Contests and Hitouts

Ruck Contests

	Ruck Contests	RC %	2023 %	2022 %
Max Gawn	48	45	43.1	57.8
Brodie Grundy	42	40	50.5	77.4
Jacob van Rooyen	15	14	9.6
Steven May	1	1	0.1	0.0
Harrison Petty	0	0	2.7	0.0
Christian Petracca	0	0	0.1	0.1
Tom McDonald			8.9	7.0
Josh Schache			6.7	13.4
Ben Brown			3.8	3.6
Clayton Oliver			0.0	0.0

Hitouts

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.	To Adv. % (2023)	To Adv. % (2022)
Max Gawn	48	23	8	31.4	33.6
Brodie Grundy	42	19	5	32.8	30.2
Jacob van Rooyen	15	5	1	16.7
Harrison Petty	0	0	0	22.2
Tom McDonald				25.0	33.3
Ben Brown				0.0	14.3
Josh Schache					33.3

Opposition hitouts

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.
Rhys Stanley	85	26	3
Mark Blicavs	12	3	1
Tom Hawkins	9	2	0

Looking at that we should have beaten them easily

There is no metric for Hollywood attitude I suppose!

[WheeloRatings 961]

I have expanded the range of information included in the stats files updates, which now include Key Team Stats, pressure for all players (including their season average), and scores from the region where chains started. All except the data sourced from the Herald Sun has now been automated, so let me know if additional information can be included or if anything is unclear.

Looking at the score sources for last night - Geelong scored 19 points to 1 from chains starting in defensive 50 (13-1 from turnovers), and 20 points to 2 from chains starting in the centre/corridor (18-1 from turnovers). A total of 39 points to 3 - Melbourne average 37.3 points to 24.9 from these locations this season.

Melbourne concede 5.8 points on average from turnovers in the centre and 5.4 points from turnovers in our opponents' defensive 50.