Jump to content

Featured Replies

Welcome back Luci. Hope you had fantastic holiday. 

6 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I'm back @DeeZone

Updated for Woewodin and Schache for  @old55

image.png.c64da950f252caf827f13b9175729b92.png

 

 

 
  • Author
2 hours ago, DeeZone said:

Welcome back LH thanks for the update on Woey Jnr and hope you had a great holiday.!!

 

6 minutes ago, Colm said:

Welcome back Luci. Hope you had fantastic holiday. 

 

Thanks guys.  Had a great holiday!

My predictions for what it's worth...

Luke Dunstan -

Will be delisted. No chance he stays on the list if he couldn't get a game all year based on his Casey form.

 

Michael Hibberd -

Unsure. Can see him retiring if he plays in a Premiership this year. Whether he gets a 1-year extension (if he wants it) all depends on his September form. I suspect he will probably get an offer if he wants one.

 

James Jordon -

Will actively seek a trade, with the club's blessing. 

 

Jake Melksham -

Will almost certainly be offered a 1-year extension, which I suspect he'll accept, even if he's offered two years elsewhere (as it would be a dud club not in contention).

 

Andy Moniz-Wakefield -

Seemed to show positive signs at Casey. I'd be surprised he we didn't retain him.

 

Josh Schache -

Ordinarily, I would have said he'd be delisted, but we won't have anyone else as emergency back-up if Grundy leaves and Brown and McDonald retire - even if they don't retire, I can't see them offering much in 2024 onwards. I think the club will explore who else is out there to fill this void, if they can get someone they have more confidence in, he's gone; if not, he gets a 1-year extension.

 

Deakyn Smith -

Given he's been around for 3 years without making his debut, and without setting the world on fire at Casey, I cannot see how he survives. I stand corrected if there's a reason for this.

 

Kye Turner -

Probably delisted, maybe rookie listed? Not really his fault, as he can't get on the park, but we need list spots. 

 
6 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I'm back @DeeZone

Updated for Woewodin and Schache for  @old55

image.png.c64da950f252caf827f13b9175729b92.png

 

Welcome back.

Is there any significance of the players highlighted in 2024?

  • Author
Just now, Nascent said:

Welcome back.

Is there any significance of the players highlighted in 2024?

No...l was fiddling with who might be off our list at the latest next year.  Forgot to remove the shading before posting.  I'll put it down to jet lag😉


  • Author
37 minutes ago, red and blue forever said:

I notice on that list of OOC players, ,K.Farris-White is not listed..? anyone know when he is contracted until?

As a B rookie he should be.  Not sure where 'The Age' sourced its info or how accurate it is.

Even tho' I changed Schache to be OOC this year I'm not sure that is correct as there was info during the year that it was 2024.  2024 makes more sense as it is unlikely he would have come across for just one year but we will see soon.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

Melksham is playing so well but as a list management and development question he may still be denied a new contract due to the FD wanting to provide more opportunities.

Some of you think these things through in such an unfeeling manner; if Grundy and Tomlinson have suitors - we are going to get them to their homes - they are not ‘required players’ to the MC or the FD.

My guess is TMac goes around again and maybe Brown is done but can’t be sure. We gave TMac another year to smooth out his contract so I doubt we will then pay it out too.

Dunstan, Hibberd, and JJ gone IMV. Schache stays as a cheap body if we see slim pickings for similar type.

Harmes, Tomlinson, Grundy and Spargo to be traded only if the capital they bring back can be used to acquire replacements or further talent. I think all 4 would get something back.

I would use this draft hand we have to reshape us a bit and bring in some talent similar to 2019 with Rivers, Pickett, and Jackson. But they will need opportunity.

at a rough guess...

dunstan - delisted
jordon - will sign as a free agent elsewhere (peptides need mids)
hibberd - retirement
melksham - 1 year extension
schache - honestly thought he was contracted for two years
d smith - delisted
k turner - delisted, re-rookied

and i expect ben brown might be forced into retirement, while you would think grundy, harmes, and tomlinson may seek trades to pastures anew, even though the latter two had little interest last year when they were clearly on the market as well

 
On 8/27/2023 at 12:06 AM, whatwhat say what said:

at a rough guess...

dunstan - delisted
jordon - will sign as a free agent elsewhere (peptides need mids)
hibberd - retirement
melksham - 1 year extension
schache - honestly thought he was contracted for two years
d smith - delisted
k turner - delisted, re-rookied

and i expect ben brown might be forced into retirement, while you would think grundy, harmes, and tomlinson may seek trades to pastures anew, even though the latter two had little interest last year when they were clearly on the market as well

agreed except would be pointless to give melk 1 so i'd give him 2 and would let kturner go, melky delisted and rerookied due to squeeze on spots

On 8/26/2023 at 7:50 PM, Lucifers Hero said:

As a B rookie he should be.  Not sure where 'The Age' sourced its info or how accurate it is.

Even tho' I changed Schache to be OOC this year I'm not sure that is correct as there was info during the year that it was 2024.  2024 makes more sense as it is unlikely he would have come across for just one year but we will see soon.

Hi LH MFC just confirmed that Josh Schache has signed on for 2024, so that sorts the Schache conundrum out. Lol.!!!


  • Author

Update for Schache's one year contract extension.

image.png.6cb1aa3fb1967b60e6fabdb276fecb75.png

7 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Update for Schache's one year contract extension.

image.png.6cb1aa3fb1967b60e6fabdb276fecb75.png

Thanks again LH for your work on this

I'm interested in the age profiles. We seem to be short of good players in the 23 to 26 age range ie Viney Hunter etc replacements long term

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Kent said:

Thanks again LH for your work on this

I'm interested in the age profiles. We seem to be short of good players in the 23 to 26 age range ie Viney Hunter etc replacements long term

Good observation as we do have a skewed age profile.  That and our long term contracts, there is a risk that in 4/5 years we are the Geelong equivalent of 'Dad's Army' in recent years.

But I am confident that JT, TL et al will keep refreshing out list as and when needed to ensure the age profile doesn't impact our performance

We had 9 players under 24 playing last weekend, and ask holding their spot pretty well (Laurie is really the only one of the 9 who is still finding his spot).

And then you can add Petty and potentially Spargo to our under 24 squad. 

So we've got a nucleus of a future squad, but do need to add a whole group more.

I can see the benefit of loading on up a super star at pick 1 to help carry that next group through, knowing that we'll be able to fill a few more holes in the 25-28 year old bracket with free agency as our older superstars contracts end.

  • Author

Updated for the one year extension to Kyah Farris-White.

image.png.92b6cd1be02537320661fdecdcee5a72.png

 

I've also prepared the chart to track list and draft pick changes.  Regarding draft picks:

  • I have assumed Grundy and JJ are gone.  Other incoming picks could be if Harmes, Tomlison etc choose to go.
  • We need to take only 3 draftees:
    • Promote Turner using ND89. 
    • Draft Brown with a later pick.  I doubt he will go as high as ND34 so my guess is we will use a pick from a player trade or more likely the JJ AFL comp possibly a 3rd round.
    • One (or maybe two) elite players in the top 5 or top 10 by trading up whatever draft picks we need to to get the player(s)we want.

We have a draft hand which is as good as any of our golden draft years (2013 to 2015 and 2019).  A huge opportunity that will set us up for the rest of this decade.

 

Edited by Lucifers Hero


2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Updated for the one year extension to Kyah Farris-White.

image.png.92b6cd1be02537320661fdecdcee5a72.png

 

I've also prepared the chart to track list and draft pick changes.  Regarding draft picks:

  • I have assumed Grundy and JJ are gone.  Other incoming picks could be if Harmes, Tomlison etc choose to go.
  • We need to take only 3 draftees:
    • Promote Turner using ND89. 
    • Draft Brown with a later pick.  I doubt he will go as high as ND34 so my guess is we will use a pick from a player trade or more likely the JJ AFL comp possibly a 3rd round.
    • One (or maybe two) elite players in the top 5 or top 10 by trading up whatever draft picks we need to to get the player(s)we want.

We have a draft hand which is as good as any of our golden draft years (2013 to 2015 and 2019).  A huge opportunity that will set us up for the rest of this decade.

 

What will be the key contracts to extend next year?

Bowey, Lever, Langdon and Sparrow. Must keep all of them I think.

Is there a chance Ben Brown retires this year? And what would that mean for our list and cap space?

3 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Updated for the one year extension to Kyah Farris-White.

image.png.92b6cd1be02537320661fdecdcee5a72.png

 

I've also prepared the chart to track list and draft pick changes.  Regarding draft picks:

  • I have assumed Grundy and JJ are gone.  Other incoming picks could be if Harmes, Tomlison etc choose to go.
  • We need to take only 3 draftees:
    • Promote Turner using ND89. 
    • Draft Brown with a later pick.  I doubt he will go as high as ND34 so my guess is we will use a pick from a player trade or more likely the JJ AFL comp possibly a 3rd round.
    • One (or maybe two) elite players in the top 5 or top 10 by trading up whatever draft picks we need to to get the player(s)we want.

We have a draft hand which is as good as any of our golden draft years (2013 to 2015 and 2019).  A huge opportunity that will set us up for the rest of this decade.

 

Thanks LH that is a great effort not easy keeping up with all the machinations of the MFC, just curious re: AMW is he signed Cat B until 2024 as I think he is definitely a keeper.!!

Also very excited about our 2023 draft hand.!!

Edited by DeeZone

  • Author
2 hours ago, DeeZone said:

Thanks LH that is a great effort not easy keeping up with all the machinations of the MFC, just curious re: AMW is he signed Cat B until 2024 as I think he is definitely a keeper.!!

Also very excited about our 2023 draft hand.!!

Thanks for picking that up.

AMW isn't yet contracted for 2024...error on my part.  Will fix on next version.

  • Author

Updated for Jake Lever's 4 year extension giving him another 5 years at the club.

image.png.b4bf09f12bf84583c3b10b941190b898.png

Repeat of chart changes noted in an earlier post (so it doesn't get lost as the thread grows):

I've also prepared the chart to track list and draft pick changes.  Regarding draft picks:

  • I have assumed Grundy and JJ are gone.  Other incoming picks could be if Harmes, Tomlison etc choose to go.
  • We need to take only 3 draftees:
    • Promote Turner using ND89. 
    • Draft Brown with a later pick.  I doubt he will go as high as ND34 so my guess is we will use a pick from a player trade or more likely the JJ AFL comp possibly a 3rd round.
    • One (or maybe two) elite players in the top 5 or top 10 by trading up whatever draft picks we need to to get the player(s)we want.

We have a draft hand which is as good as any of our golden draft years (2013 to 2015 and 2019).  A huge opportunity that will set us up for the rest of this decade.


1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Updated for Jake Lever's 4 year extension giving him another 5 years at the club.

image.png.b4bf09f12bf84583c3b10b941190b898.png

Repeat of chart changes noted in an earlier post (so it doesn't get lost as the thread grows):

I've also prepared the chart to track list and draft pick changes.  Regarding draft picks:

  • I have assumed Grundy and JJ are gone.  Other incoming picks could be if Harmes, Tomlison etc choose to go.
  • We need to take only 3 draftees:
    • Promote Turner using ND89. 
    • Draft Brown with a later pick.  I doubt he will go as high as ND34 so my guess is we will use a pick from a player trade or more likely the JJ AFL comp possibly a 3rd round.
    • One (or maybe two) elite players in the top 5 or top 10 by trading up whatever draft picks we need to to get the player(s)we want.

We have a draft hand which is as good as any of our golden draft years (2013 to 2015 and 2019).  A huge opportunity that will set us up for the rest of this decade.

Love that Rivers and Kozzie are signed all the way till the end of 2027, where they will have each reached be the ripe old age of 26 years old! 

Edited by FarNorthernD

You'd assume that Hunter and Langdon are sure things for an extension due to age and FA status.

So really it's just Bowey and Sparrow that I'm sweating on for next year.

And Petty and JVR for 2025.

Sure it'd be nice to keep Jordan and Laurie, but at this point neither are critical.

Pretty amazing really.

  • Author
17 hours ago, FarNorthernD said:

Love that Rivers and Kozzie are signed all the way till the end of 2027, where they will have each reached be the ripe old age of 26 years old! 

The downside is they will both be FA's when their contracts expire.  Lets hope they will still want to stay!!  If they want ot go the club is unlikely to play games and force trades etc...

 
13 hours ago, deanox said:

You'd assume that Hunter and Langdon are sure things for an extension due to age and FA status.

So really it's just Bowey and Sparrow that I'm sweating on for next year.

And Petty and JVR for 2025.

Sure it'd be nice to keep Jordan and Laurie, but at this point neither are critical.

Pretty amazing really.

We need to lock JVR and Petty, they'll become cornerstones of the next generation.

If we get Reid, however unlikely, Sparrow becomes less important.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 528 replies