Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Ordinary article by Caro in TheAge

Citing Sam Mitchell's book published in 2018, and conversations with non-indigenous player who all said "that their own experiences should not be compared to those published in the cultural safety review"

And the majority "stressed that Clarkson saw himself as a father figure at the club who, while at times overstepping the mark in interfering in their personal lives, firmly believed he was prioritising the best interests of his footballers"

The most shocking "fresh" allegation is that Mitchell had to hand his phone in with all temates while away and his Mrs was often needing to take on of the babies to hospital  -  and a few paragraphs later actually note the fact that the phone was given back and an exception made for him...

So a non-story with no relevant new information insinuating there is more shocking accusations, just so Caro can get some column inches out the door...

Come on mate, pretty clearly you're trying to diminish what happened here seemingly because you have something against Caroline Wilson for some reason.

Re: 'taking one of the babies to hospital' - Clearly more serious than that, and Evans had to step in:

Both Sam and Lyndall Mitchell had feared for daughter Scarlett's survival at a young age. Then-football boss Mark Evans is understood to have stepped in and returned Mitchell's phone to him so he could remain in contact with his wife.

Mitchell: “I felt I didn't get a lot of empathy from the powers that be at Hawthorn for what Lyndall and I were going through,”

Then:

The Age have also reported further allegations against Clarkson that surround his controlling behaviour have surfaced, with the four-time premiership coach alleged to have:

  • Expressed surprise before the twins' birth that Mitchell was having children so close together (the Mitchell's son Smith was 11 months old when the twins were born) and wondered at the effect this might have upon his playing career.
  • Publicly announced Mitchell was missing a game against Richmond due to personal reasons relating to the twins' health without the player's knowledge or consent.
  • Ultimately agreed to treat Mitchell with more respect when the pair resolved their differences at the end of the season but again questioned the wisdom of the timing of the twins' birth.

Further details surrounding the Mitchells' time at the club were also recounted by the wife of an ex-player, who revealed Lyndall was criticised for not showing enough emotion following the club's preliminary final loss to Collingwood in 2011.

What Clarkson "believes" has absolutely no bearing on this as is not a defence at all. It's what you actually do that matters, not how you define it in your own mind.

It's not end of the world stuff, but absolutely adds to a picture about Clarkson.

 

I agree there's probably not a lot of new info here. Clarko's been known to be controlling for a long time. Once a school teacher, always a school teacher.

But the behaviour towards families and pregnant women does seem beyond the scope of normal psycho footy stuff.

In some ways this might help him because he wasn't just picking on Indigenous players, he was willing to give similar treatment to his former captain!

6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

I agree there's probably not a lot of new info here. Clarko's been known to be controlling for a long time. Once a school teacher, always a school teacher.

But the behaviour towards families and pregnant women does seem beyond the scope of normal psycho footy stuff.

In some ways this might help him because he wasn't just picking on Indigenous players, he was willing to give similar treatment to his former captain!

I had heard this before but just googled it to find the attribution.

 

A famous quote from Green Bay Packer glory years defensive tackle Henry Jordan referring to his coach Vince Lombardi,

“Lombardi treated us all the same, like dogs.”

 

 
10 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I had heard this before but just googled it to find the attribution.

 

A famous quote from Green Bay Packer glory years defensive tackle Henry Jordan referring to his coach Vince Lombardi,

“Lombardi treated us all the same, like dogs.”

 

yes, uncle. let's just hope they don't deconstruct ron barassi or norm smith.   might have to pull a couple of statues down. 

40 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I had heard this before but just googled it to find the attribution.

 

A famous quote from Green Bay Packer glory years defensive tackle Henry Jordan referring to his coach Vince Lombardi,

“Lombardi treated us all the same, like dogs.”

 

Great quote Unc!


1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

I agree there's probably not a lot of new info here. Clarko's been known to be controlling for a long time. Once a school teacher, always a school teacher.

But the behaviour towards families and pregnant women does seem beyond the scope of normal psycho footy stuff.

In some ways this might help him because he wasn't just picking on Indigenous players, he was willing to give similar treatment to his former captain!

In other ways it doesn't.  It adds credibility to the indigenous families' claims since it is independent evidence of his controlling behaviour.  The degree, extent and nature of the controlling behaviour in the case of indigenous players can still raise the question of racism.

1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

I agree there's probably not a lot of new info here. Clarko's been known to be controlling for a long time. Once a school teacher, always a school teacher.

But the behaviour towards families and pregnant women does seem beyond the scope of normal psycho footy stuff.

In some ways this might help him because he wasn't just picking on Indigenous players, he was willing to give similar treatment to his former captain!

Kind of although the allegations are a little different in that Clarkson doesn't seem to have encouraged Mitchell and his partner to have an abortion once they found out they were pregnant only months after having their first child and didn't encourage Mitchell to leave his partner, swap the Sim from his phone, tell him to move in with an assistant coach and deny all contact between he and his partner.

Of course this is assuming Mitchell's allegations are even true, at the moment they are just unsubstantiated allegations which the former coaches haven't had an opportunity to respond to and which don't appear to be supported by any evidence whatsoever. Merely hearsay at this stage, hopefully Clarksons lawyer can cross-examine Mitchell to get to the truth of the matter.

3 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Of course this is assuming Mitchell's allegations are even true, at the moment they are just unsubstantiated allegations which the former coaches haven't had an opportunity to respond to and which don't appear to be supported by any evidence whatsoever. Merely hearsay at this stage, hopefully Clarksons lawyer can cross-examine Mitchell to get to the truth of the matter.

Not sure if you would call the extract's from Mitchell's book evidence but no one complained at the time it was published.

Referenced in the article fresh-allegations-emerge-of-alastair-clarkson-s-controlling-behaviour: " Mitchell detailed some elements of his fall-out with Clarkson in his autobiography Relentless, which was published after his playing retirement. He stated in the book that he came close to leaving Hawthorn for Collingwood so deep was his disappointment at the way he was treated by the senior coach".

Some really unsavoury stuff quoted from Mitchell's book.

 
2 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

Come on mate, pretty clearly you're trying to diminish what happened here seemingly because you have something against Caroline Wilson for some reason

Garbage, and you know it

I have no idea what happened here, and have stated that above. Neither do most people btw

Simply calling out this story doesn’t add fresh allegations, and the story also admits the experiences spoken of should not be compared to those published in the cultural safety review... But written in a way to give the impression she's added to the case against Clarkson

You are right, tho, that I don't rate Caro, because of articles like this

14 minutes ago, sue said:

In other ways it doesn't.  It adds credibility to the indigenous families' claims since it is independent evidence of his controlling behaviour.  The degree, extent and nature of the controlling behaviour in the case of indigenous players can still raise the question of racism.

I agree, but it does give them a bit of an out that the motivation wasn’t racial even if the result was. The alleged behaviour is at a minimum culturally insensitive, which from there can easily be called systemic racism. Career wise you can still survive that (if some of the allegations don’t stack up). Overt racism not so much. 


1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

I agree there's probably not a lot of new info here. Clarko's been known to be controlling for a long time. Once a school teacher, always a school teacher.

But the behaviour towards families and pregnant women does seem beyond the scope of normal psycho footy stuff.

In some ways this might help him because he wasn't just picking on Indigenous players, he was willing to give similar treatment to his former captain!

 

19 minutes ago, sue said:

In other ways it doesn't.  It adds credibility to the indigenous families' claims since it is independent evidence of his controlling behaviour.  The degree, extent and nature of the controlling behaviour in the case of indigenous players can still raise the question of racism.

I think these two takes are a strong potential to be the competing narratives coming out of any further investigation 

My guess is that any allegations are based in (at least some level of) fact. But context and different individual perspectives aren't yet clear and will be important 

But I can’t see a situation where context or varied perspectives can explain the accusations of pressuring family planning decisions... If that's in any way true, then those responsible are likely irreparably damaged

5 hours ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Ordinary article by Caro in TheAge

Citing Sam Mitchell's book published in 2018, and conversations with non-indigenous player who all said "that their own experiences should not be compared to those published in the cultural safety review"

And the majority "stressed that Clarkson saw himself as a father figure at the club who, while at times overstepping the mark in interfering in their personal lives, firmly believed he was prioritising the best interests of his footballers"

The most shocking "fresh" allegation is that Mitchell had to hand his phone in with all temates while away and his Mrs was often needing to take on of the babies to hospital  -  and a few paragraphs later actually note the fact that the phone was given back and an exception made for him...

So a non-story with no relevant new information insinuating there is more shocking accusations, just so Caro can get some column inches out the door...

She’s an absolute tra$p

7 hours ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Garbage, and you know it

I have no idea what happened here, and have stated that above. Neither do most people btw

Simply calling out this story doesn’t add fresh allegations, and the story also admits the experiences spoken of should not be compared to those published in the cultural safety review... But written in a way to give the impression she's added to the case against Clarkson

You are right, tho, that I don't rate Caro, because of articles like this

Couldn’t agree more and personally I prefer to wait for the facts to come out prior to making judgement or commenting on these matters. Here though, we have the same old Demonland know it all’s casting aspersions and making judgements without knowing any of the facts. 


21 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

I agree there's probably not a lot of new info here. Clarko's been known to be controlling for a long time. Once a school teacher, always a school teacher.

But the behaviour towards families and pregnant women does seem beyond the scope of normal psycho footy stuff.

In some ways this might help him because he wasn't just picking on Indigenous players, he was willing to give similar treatment to his former captain!

While some of the stories look to overstep the mark re what many if us would find acceptable, Clarkson and Fagan's primary role was to win Premierships and they were very successful at that during the period in question.  It is pretty clear that a stable home environment is conducive to high performance on the field so it is reasonable that the Footy department discusses with players their relationships, plans to have children etc.

It looks like their approach is consistent across both First Nations and non-indigenous players, and that while the approach may not have adequately taken into account the cultural sensitivities of the indigenous players, this is an area we are still learning about as a society. I'm not convinced Clarkson and Fagan have done much wrong here, certainly not to the extent that the media has portrayed, and not to the point that they should be stepping down from their roles.


10 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

This is all so grim and massively tarnishes their success at the time.

Yes it does. And I am sure ‘three-peats’ are much easier when you create a culture that family is to be diminished and all of life outside football are considered distractions to avoid. 

I can now get my head around how that ‘culture’ can be then applied to the indigenous experience with appalling consequences. 

Starting to see they treated everyone the same…

Family club hey…

WorkSafe are now involved worksafe-probes-hawthorn-amid-racism-allegations

They AFL will now have three 'reports' to fight 'rear guard' actions on if it doesn't get its 'panel' together very quickly. 

They have completely lost control of this.  They can't shape the agenda, the optics nor the outcomes.  Which is probably a good thing.  Too much manipulation of 'negative' news in the past.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

9 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

WorkSafe are now involved worksafe-probes-hawthorn-amid-racism-allegations

They AFL will now have three 'reports' to fight 'rear guard' actions on if it doesn't get its 'panel' together very quickly. 

They have completely lost control of this. 

Not only that Luci but the newspaper article this morning claimed "materials seized" by Worksafe.

What are these materials? Will the AFL panel have access? Will witnesses etc want to speak to both enquiries?

The Worksafe enquiry has legal validity.

Is the AFL enquiry now compromised or even superfluous?

Edited by Bitter but optimistic

 
13 minutes ago, chookrat said:

While some of the stories look to overstep the mark re what many if us would find acceptable, Clarkson and Fagan's primary role was to win Premierships and they were very successful at that during the period in question.  It is pretty clear that a stable home environment is conducive to high performance on the field so it is reasonable that the Footy department discusses with players their relationships, plans to have children etc.

It looks like their approach is consistent across both First Nations and non-indigenous players, and that while the approach may not have adequately taken into account the cultural sensitivities of the indigenous players, this is an area we are still learning about as a society. I'm not convinced Clarkson and Fagan have done much wrong here, certainly not to the extent that the media has portrayed, and not to the point that they should be stepping down from their roles.

I've found it interesting the backlash at the allegations that HFC intervened in the home living arrangements for one (or more?) of those laying accusations. I understand that football clubs routinely advise (or require) certain living arrangements and have role dedicated to developing players off-field, even today...

I'm waiting to understand the context, and if there was a lack of cultural sensitivity that meant indigenous players as a group weren't treated appropriately. Or whether it was one individual circumstances not treated appropriately. Or another explanation...

Time may tell? (Or may not)

2 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Not only that Luci but the newspaper article this morning claimed "materials seized" by Worksafe.

What are these materials? Will the AFL panel have access? Will witnesses etc want to speak to both enquiries?

Is the AFL enquiry now compromised or even superfluous?

Noticed that too... "Seized" is an interesting choice of words.

I wonder if the "seizing" involved a routine request for relevant information and the helpful compliance of those providing the information?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Fremantle

    A month is a long time in AFL football. The proof of this is in the current state of the two teams contesting against each other early this Saturday afternoon at the MCG. It’s hard to fathom that when Melbourne and Fremantle kicked off the 2025 season, the former looked like being a major player in this year’s competition after it came close to beating one of the favourites in the GWS Giants while the latter was smashed by Geelong to the tune of 78 points and looked like rubbish. Fast forward to today and the Demons are low on confidence and appear panic stricken as their winless streak heads towards an even half dozen and pressure mounts on the coach and team leadership.  Meanwhile, the Dockers have recovered their composure and now sit in the top eight. They are definitely on the up and up and look most likely winners this weekend against a team which they have recently dominated and which struggles to find enough passages to the goals to trouble the scorers. And with that, Fremantle will head to the MCG, feeling very good about itself after demolishing Richmond in the Barossa Valley with Josh Treacy coming off a six goal haul and facing up to a Melbourne defence already without Jake Lever and a shaky Steven May needing to pass a fitness test just to make it onto the field of play. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 06

    The Easter Round kicks off in style with a Thursday night showdown between Brisbane and Collingwood, as both sides look to solidify their spots inside the Top 4 early in the season. Good Friday brings a double-header, with Carlton out to claim consecutive wins when they face the struggling Kangaroos, while later that night the Eagles host the Bombers in Perth, still chasing their first victory of the year. Saturday features another marquee clash as the resurgent Crows look to rebound from back-to-back losses against a formidable GWS outfit. That evening, all eyes will be on Marvel Stadium where Damien Hardwick returns to face his old side—the Tigers—coaching the Suns at a ground he's never hidden his disdain for. Sunday offers two crucial contests where the prize is keeping touch with the Top 8. First, Sydney and Port Adelaide go head-to-head, followed by a fierce battle between the Bulldogs and the Saints. Then, Easter Monday delivers the traditional clash between two bitter rivals, both desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top end of the ladder. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 9 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Essendon

    What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 59 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Love
    • 208 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 24 replies
    Demonland