Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

When was the last VFL game played ??

6-8 weeks ago?

The one thing I think we can all agree on, is that Jonesy is a team player. He has put in loads of work into his body and I have no doubt he wouldn’t be putting his hand up in what he knows is the most important two games in our recent history, if he didn’t think he could make it through. 
He wants to win a flag as much as anyone, and if he does play he will absolutely give us everything he has left in the tank. 

 
12 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

Good to see you here!

They're in number order, and so is the Interchange, I'm  not reading in.

OK.  Good pick up.

I still have a funny feeling he'll be named.  Probably nothing...

1 minute ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

OK.  Good pick up.

I still have a funny feeling he'll be named.  Probably nothing...

Haven’t seen you around here in a long time. 
 

How are you feeling about this game? Confident?

 
15 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

There was talk that Henderson was going through a fitness test today.

we can only hope he makes it through the fitness test!

All this talk of the sub, I'm not that interested to be honest.  On most occasions this year we have not used the sub and hopefully that trend continues.


2 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

OK.  Good pick up.

I still have a funny feeling he'll be named.  Probably nothing...

I hope you're right. He would be a good sub option.

And a bit of romanticism might add some magic.

And I reckon goody likes a bit of magic 

10 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

When was the last VFL game played ??

6-8 weeks ago?

They have been playing match sims and regardless of who is the sub they are pretty much in the same position 

50 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Really surprised by Zach Guthrie who a mate of mine has suggested (Jeelong) that if he plays ut plays right inro our hands!! I DEFINATELY would have played Hunt over Hibberd easily and I hope this doesnt end in tragedy! Hunt not even on extended bench???? Dont like it one bit. JONES to be medical sub take  it to the bank!

Yep, Hunt is vital to so many of our yardage clearances, and in catching opponents on the trot with the ball, striving for some glory. This is a blow to our potential to rip the Cats apart. His linkage work with the backline, the outside mids and into the forward line is going to be missed.

Hibberd may well be spent by 3/4 time. 

 

 
Just now, binman said:

I hope you're right. He would be a good sub option.

And a bit of romanticism might add some magic.

And I reckon goody likes a bit of magic 

If we go with Jones this week, barring something unforeseen, we pretty much have to go with him next week given the twins on the way.  I'm not feeling it.

Just now, Deemania since 56 said:

Yep, Hunt is vital to so many of our yardage clearances, and in catching opponents on the trot with the ball, striving for some glory. This is a blow to our potential to rip the Cats apart. His linkage work with the backline, the outside mids and into the forward line is going to be missed.

Hibberd may well be spent by 3/4 time. 

 

Sincerely hope that you’re wrong 


Simple change, I agree with it. I was an advocate for Hunt being the sub as I feel like he provides more versatility, but Jordon has been the sub before and come on to play well so I'm comfortable with it.

Shame for Smith, big chance for Hibberd. 

Ok now I gotta go vomit from the nerves (again!). 

33 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Haven’t seen you around here in a long time. 
 

How are you feeling about this game? Confident?

Yes, I'm confident we'll win.  Put simply, our best is better. 

We have three top 10 players in the league, the best defence (historically very significant), they're tough, and our stars are now in their prime.  

Of course, there are no guarantees, but there are also no excuses.  

Edited by Hannibal Inc.

11 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Haven’t seen you around here in a long time. 

And as for the absence ?

I like arguing.  What's there been to argue about this year ?

2 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

And as for the absence ?

I like arguing.  What's there been to argue about this year ?

We miss Jack Watts in this team. 

Agree?

This has probably been posted elsewhere on here and it's obviously an initiative of the club but anyways.  This is the wrap going on the 'Bus West' Demon Bandwagon bus for tomorrow...

Screenshot_20210909-193958_Facebook.thumb.jpg.0a60feba76bc7ecf888eb39f4704de6d.jpg


I like arguing.  What's there been to argue about this year ?

We should all give up football and instead follow track and field.  Discus.

Edited by Demonstone
edited

12 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

And as for the absence ?

I like arguing.  What's there been to argue about this year ?

Weideman vs Tmac. Discuss. 
 

Who is more important, Clarry or Trac?

Is Jackson a forward?
 

Demonland is never short of an argument. But this place has been unusually chipper in recent weeks. Sickening really. 

Edited by Jaded

7 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

This has probably been posted elsewhere on here and it's obviously an initiative of the club but anyways.  This is the wrap going on the 'Bus West' Demon Bandwagon bus for tomorrow...

Screenshot_20210909-193958_Facebook.thumb.jpg.0a60feba76bc7ecf888eb39f4704de6d.jpg

Needs less teeth. 

The sub is always somewhat of a contingency gamble, striking the balance between flexible coverage in the event of an early injury and a player who can impact if an injury comes in the later stages during a tight contest. 

I don't trust him, but Melksham probably best fits the bill for both eventualities. Jones can provide flexible coverage but with probably limited impact, while Chandler could impact but without significant four-quarter coverage. 

Both can be liabilities though. And then there's Jordon. If a KPP goes down at either end, Gawn will most likely have to shoulder the extra load. So then it revolves around any midfield injuries and mostly supporting rotations. 

My heart says Jones, naturally, while my head says Melksham and my inner-accountant says Jordon. My cocky cowboy however wants Chandler. I see a lot in the kid, and can envisage him causing Geelong some problems if he came on late. 

50 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

Fort on the Geelong emergency list is interesting, I wonder if there's a question over Stanley, Blicavs or Ratugolea?

News tonight said henderson has a hamstring issue


Just hit me that this time tomorrow night.....

I'll be doing this.

cat face GIF

 
1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

Don't know if this has been posted on here yet: https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/teams/melbourne-demons/afl-finals-2021-melbourne-vs-geelong-preliminary-final-mental-scars-2018-prelim-vs-west-coast-will-schofield-comments-news/news-story/22b7e75c5968ee20a3d0079db4ccd8d8

Will Schofield is a [censored] but the insight into how West Coast treated us with absolute disdain in 2018 is interesting.

The story is an intetesting piece of self promotion. Look how clever we were.

The heart of the story is really about schofields propensity for his own mental scarring and fears on gf day.

In that gf in 18 josh Kennedy dragged them over the line. 

Schofields gf record:?

In 2015 gf. 5 kicks in 92% tog

In 2018 gf 7 kicks in 100% tog

Huge contibutory gf record - not.

Good read though.

8 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Just hit me that this time tomorrow night.....

I'll be doing this.

cat face GIF

Just went and bought all the requisite snacks and drinks for tomorrow night now, so no need to be out in public in the lead-up to the game. My local Woolies had boxes of Cheezles on special for $1, which I haven't eaten since 1988, so I took it as a redemptive omen. Should make any Gawn-yawn interesting though if I lose my nerve before kick-off. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 177 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 436 replies