Jump to content

Free Kick Differential 2021

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 

That will change dramatically, West Coast play at home this week!

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 4
    • Sad 1
     

    Adelaide +29, is that legit? That’s a huge number for only 2 rounds.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Shocked 1
    • Angry 1
    19 minutes ago, Forest Demon said:

    Adelaide +29, is that legit? That’s a huge number for only 2 rounds.

    25 of those are due to The Texan laying forward 50 tackles ?

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1

    There is no sensible and credible way to justify a differential of 45 between top and bottom after only 2 rounds.

    Is there any breakup of the types of free kicks eg. out of bounds on the full vs free kicks earned at the contest, high tackles vs incorrect disposal vs holding the man vs interference in a marking contest etc?

    I look forward to the AFL's attempts to explain away these differentials.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Adelaide count is quite pronounced but probably just an anomaly given just 2 games in. Other than than looks like a typical bell curve.

    Probably runs counter to a lot of people's biases e.g Geelong get preferential treatment from the umps.

     

    Edited by Better days ahead

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    I'm a bit confused - we've played Freo and Saints, Freo and Saints have played GWS in the two rounds.

    The sum of Freo, Dees, GWS and Saints should then be zero as we collectively haven't played anyone else. But it's +1

    Additional proof the AFL is doing everything it can for GWS (not just financially). 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    11 hours ago, dworship said:

    That will change dramatically, West Coast play at home this week!

    How absolutely correct .I still vividly remember playing West Coast and Mitch Clark being manhandled by half their defence whenever he went for a mark and no kick being given  ..Our free kick total to half time .? .Somewhere between nil and zero .Not a single free .When the game was virtually over crowd stopped umpiring the match  we then started to get frees .Disgraceful.I cant understand why the Lions were upset at not getting the last minute free at Geelong .Did they think that the umpire would incur the wrath of the Geelong crowd ?.Not likely

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    4 hours ago, tiers said:

    I look forward to the AFL's attempts to explain away these differentials.

    More than likely, it will never happen to our great dismay. There are no clear signs that umpiring and free kicks to affect a game are under appropriate 'even playing field' management from the AFL.

    Edited by Deemania since 56

  • Quote

    4 hours ago, tiers said:

    I look forward to the AFL's attempts to explain away these differentials.

    What's to explain? Flip a coin enough times and you'll also get some strange patterns; that's just the nature of statistics.

    Good umpiring doesn't mean an even free kick count. 2 rounds in, it's hardly surprising that there are a couple of outliers.

    It's only when patterns emerge over time (e.g., West Coast having a positive free kick differential every year since the Triassic era), that claims of umpiring bias have any validity.

  • Quote

    No so simple. The average number of free kicks per game has been falling in recent seasons to somewhere in the low 30s total for both teams.

    With so few free kicks being awarded, for one team to have received 29 more than its opponents in only 2 games is more than a coin toss statistic. Say there are 30 in a match. For Adelaide to have received 29 more than their opponents  the numbers equate to 22.25 per game (total 44.5) vs 7.75 per game (total 15.5), a factor of nearly 3 times.

    For once the Dees are all square although some of us one eyed supporter believe that the Adelaide distortion would be better if it was applied for the benefit of the Dees.

    There is something more at play and it requires a better analysis than mine.

  • Quote
    7 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

    I'm a bit confused - we've played Freo and Saints, Freo and Saints have played GWS in the two rounds.

    The sum of Freo, Dees, GWS and Saints should then be zero as we collectively haven't played anyone else. But it's +1

    Additional proof the AFL is doing everything it can for GWS (not just financially). 

    No necessarily. One of the Texans 25 holding the ball frees was against the umpire during the round 1 St Kilda / GWS match when the umpire was collecting the ball for a throw in, so it's +1 to the Texan (who was barracking for Saints) and -1 to the umpire.

    Edited by chookrat

  • Quote

    The God of free kicks...and i thought it was a deceased Umpire.

  • Quote
    • Demonland changed the title to Free Kick Differential 2021

    Hoping that free kick differential continues to head south for Geelong for at least 1 more week.

  • Quote

    They should off-set all the free kicks against Geelong that weren't paid to the opps:  throws, dropping the ball, faking 'high' contact etc etc.  That would even the differential quite a bit.

    Edited by Lucifer's Hero

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I hope the MFC footy dept had a quiet word with the AFL umpires during the week about Oliver been held at every stoppage. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1

    After watching the Giants, I'm amazed they're +15 free kick differential. All I was off the ball sniping and playing the man.

    Mind you, there were a lot of missed free kicks (in my biased humble opinion), so this could explain it.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    1 hour ago, FarNorthernD said:

    I hope the MFC footy dept had a quiet word with the AFL umpires during the week about Oliver been held at every stoppage. 

    That is an occurrence that must be addressed - so far in Clarrie's career this has been an unaccountable constant and an absolute 'blind-spot' for umpires; in each game the Dees play this anomoly arises, and must surely be addressed, and acknowledged satisfactorily, not just haphazardly. As for the excesses of holding, bashing from behind, etc that Gawn experiences, we must question if the umpires are fit for purpose.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    3 minutes ago, Deemania since 56 said:

    That is an occurrence that must be addressed - so far in Clarrie's career this has been an unaccountable constant and an absolute 'blind-spot' for umpires; in each game the Dees play this anomoly arises, and must surely be addressed, and acknowledged satisfactorily, not just haphazardly. As for the excesses of holding, bashing from behind, etc that Gawn experiences, we must question if the umpires are fit for purpose.

    Blind-spot? Didn't Oliver get a number of off-the-ball free kicks against the Giants?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    17 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Blind-spot? Didn't Oliver get a number of off-the-ball free kicks against the Giants?

    In a very low priority, somewhat '...on occasion...'  The ratio of infringements to frees given to CO would be as low as 1: 10 - where only the most blatant, open-space misdemeanour was acknowledged, and late, as well. Just another episode inside a saga of 'allowable onfield abuse'.

  • Quote
    •  

    #FreeKickWhoeverIsPlayingHawthornorGeelong 

  • Quote

    Re; Clarrie's treatment.

    Arms around the waist in the goal square is paid as a free kick even when there is no interference or impedence. What a laugh.

    Arms around the waist that do impede Clarrie from  running to a ball up of throw in is not considered to be worthy of a free kick. With three umpires on the field it surely must be visible to one at least. Time for S Hocking to fix this up.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 6

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Carlton

      Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: North Melbourne

      I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Werribee

      The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Carlton

      The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
        • Haha
        • Love
        • Like
      • 222 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: North Melbourne

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • 29 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

      The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 253 replies
      Demonland
    View All