Jump to content

Featured Replies

11 hours ago, DubDee said:

We finished 3 places higher than Freo last year. Therefore we are a better team. Fact. 

Sorry Dubby, we were better. Past tense.

 
12 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Any chance we can throw Hunt back into the forward line?

Is a natural goal kicker coming off a 4 goal game versus Essendon and blind Freddy can see that our fwd line aside from Fritsch can’t kick a goal to save themselves.

Won't happen.  Not a bad idea but Hunt has spent the pre-season training in the backline.  With the rule changes his explosive speed from defence can be a weapon again.

Our forward half doesn't look potent but I think v the dogs that was actually more about the midfield not getting it in there enough or in spots that we are able to lock it into.  I'm hoping that Kozzie / Chandler / Spargo / ANB / whichever resting midfielders are there can put on manic pressure that creates turnovers.   We looked ok v Richmond - lets see how we go with most of our midfield back.

 
On 3/10/2021 at 9:13 AM, BScotti said:

Like it.  Probably only change I would make is to bring in Baker onto the bench instead of Chandler.  Just adds more flexibility.

Generally agree, except for Baker who has had a decent run and opportunity to 'pre-season' display himself. He is not setting the world on fire at the moment indicative of more time needed at the lower level. 

Also, looking at Action Jackson's suggested line-up, I'd reckon that Petty, at CHBack should swing to CHForward -  and CHForward should be TMac, not Jackson. That way, Tom's defensive capabilities and experience can be utilised and hopefully, Petty's talent can burn a few goals or opportunities.

Jackson is a mover moreso than a key position player at present. I suggest that he therefore be considered as a utility - albeit in the forward line - and importantly, in support of the smaller forward brigade rather than as an end to the forward penetration.Jackson has the ability, size and mobility to be a play-maker and a difficult object to hustle from the ball without umpiring penalties.

ANB is deserving of a forward spot and in weeks to come, will most probably prove to be a great support to Melksham, on return. In the interim, we are getting some value and confidence from ANB - if he can sustain it, well and good as he is playing better footy so far this year than he has in the past.

If we can beat Freo - despite the ramp of excuses that they project - we could be on the way....

 

1 hour ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Generally agree, except for Baker who has had a decent run and opportunity to 'pre-season' display himself. He is not setting the world on fire at the moment indicative of more time needed at the lower level. 

Also, looking at Action Jackson's suggested line-up, I'd reckon that Petty, at CHBack should swing to CHForward -  and CHForward should be TMac, not Jackson. That way, Tom's defensive capabilities and experience can be utilised and hopefully, Petty's talent can burn a few goals or opportunities.

Jackson is a mover moreso than a key position player at present. I suggest that he therefore be considered as a utility - albeit in the forward line - and importantly, in support of the smaller forward brigade rather than as an end to the forward penetration.Jackson has the ability, size and mobility to be a play-maker and a difficult object to hustle from the ball without umpiring penalties.

ANB is deserving of a forward spot and in weeks to come, will most probably prove to be a great support to Melksham, on return. In the interim, we are getting some value and confidence from ANB - if he can sustain it, well and good as he is playing better footy so far this year than he has in the past.

If we can beat Freo - despite the ramp of excuses that they project - we could be on the way....

 

Nibbler’s value has significantly increased with rotations dropping to 75 and the return to full length quarters. The boy can run as far as the day is long. Couple that with what looks to be a spell of strong form and It wouldn’t surprise me to see him playing the majority of games this year.

This game is must win IMO. If we don’t, it’s not an overstatement to say that Goodwin immediately goes on notice. He’s essentially done that to himself by stating in so many words that top 4 is the pass mark. We simply ,must start the season on our home ground against Freo with a W.

Edited by P-man


2 hours ago, deelusions from afar said:

Won't happen.  Not a bad idea but Hunt has spent the pre-season training in the backline.  With the rule changes his explosive speed from defence can be a weapon again.

Our forward half doesn't look potent but I think v the dogs that was actually more about the midfield not getting it in there enough or in spots that we are able to lock it into.  I'm hoping that Kozzie / Chandler / Spargo / ANB / whichever resting midfielders are there can put on manic pressure that creates turnovers.   We looked ok v Richmond - lets see how we go with most of our midfield back.

Agree that we need Hunt's explosiveness across half back and it will pay off at times. However he is such a low possession gatherer and compare that to another half back flanker in Jayden Short from Richmond who got about 40 touches other night.

Hunt doesn't get involved enough in the game. Not sure what happened since 2016/2017 as he was way more involved back then.

So I'm thinking a 7 possession 2 goal game at half forward is of more value to the team than a 13 possession game at half back with only a couple of decent carries of the ball.

I agree with your last point in that our forward line functioned as well as it could Vs Richmond considering we had Brown, Weid, Melksham and Kozzie missing.

We need a T Mac miracle if we are going to salvage the first part of our season. In the two practice matches he has shown nothing to suggest that such a miracle will be forthcoming but we've lived in hope rather than expectation for so many of the last 50 years...

12 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

We need a T Mac miracle if we are going to salvage the first part of our season. In the two practice matches he has shown nothing to suggest that such a miracle will be forthcoming but we've lived in hope rather than expectation for so many of the last 50 years...

Someone else (Axis of Bob maybe?) posted our conversion from entries being basically the same as the Bulldogs. And we scored well against Richmond. Our failing against the Dogs was in the middle where we had no personnel. Well, that and our ball movement being noticeably sloppier than the opposition but that’s par for the course.

 
  • Author
14 hours ago, DubDee said:

We finished 3 places higher than Freo last year. Therefore we are a better team. Fact. 

Nah they beat us when we had finals on the line. They are a better team.

15 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Any chance we can throw Hunt back into the forward line?

Is a natural goal kicker coming off a 4 goal game versus Essendon and blind Freddy can see that our fwd line aside from Fritsch can’t kick a goal to save themselves.

Hunt is a natural goal-kicker?. now I've heard it all. 


Is Mitch Brown injured or underprepared? He was best on ground v Bombers in our last game of 2020. Had a pretty good last few rounds as an agile CHF. 

This may have been said before but I would like to see Nathan Jones played forward. He is a reliable set shot, can win his own ball at stoppages and has some goal nous as evidenced in the game against Sydney at the SCG in 2019. It also spares me from watching him bomb it into the forward line

Don't know why everyone looks to tmac to save the day or even compete at this level.He was a very ordinary chb ,cringeworthy most of the time,had a stellar few weeks when moved forward by suprise,then back to the same ol same ol

6 hours ago, Dr.D said:

Hunt is a natural goal-kicker?. now I've heard it all. 

He actually is.

He’s a reliable set shot for goal and go back and watch his winning set shot for goal against Carlton in 2019 - 52 mtr set shot.

Or the 3 goals from 50 he kicked in round 18 last year.

Or the 75 mtr torpedo he kicked against Adelaide in 2017.

Or the accurate 21.10 he kicked in 2019 for a career total of 41.20.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

Could Bowey do an Angus Brayshaw of 2015?

Little exposure in the pre season comp but hit the ground running in round 1. Just have a gut feel he could slot in straight away and contribute.


5 hours ago, forever demons said:

Don't know why everyone looks to tmac to save the day or even compete at this level.He was a very ordinary chb ,cringeworthy most of the time,had a stellar few weeks when moved forward by suprise,then back to the same ol same ol

A stellar few weeks?

He came 6th in coleman with 50 odd goals in 2018.

Are you suggesting he kicked a bag of 10 for five weeks straight?

6 hours ago, The Swimming Dee said:

This may have been said before but I would like to see Nathan Jones played forward. He is a reliable set shot, can win his own ball at stoppages and has some goal nous as evidenced in the game against Sydney at the SCG in 2019. It also spares me from watching him bomb it into the forward line

He is being played forward.

51 minutes ago, binman said:

A stellar few weeks?

He came 6th in coleman with 50 odd goals in 2018.

Are you suggesting he kicked a bag of 10 for five weeks straight?

50 odd goals AND he missed the first 4 weeks of the season from memory. Tmac was a genuine forward force in 2018. 

  • Author

After Caseys final hitout tonight, heres my team for Freo

 

B         Rivers              May               Lever

HB       Hunt             Tomlinson      Hibberd

C       Langdon           Oliver              ANB

HF      Chandler          Daw            Harmes

F        Jackson          Fritsch           Pickett               

R        Gawn             Petracca         Brayshaw

IC        Jones       Bowey       Spargo     Jordon

 

Emergencies    -     Sparrow   T Mac   Petty   Jetta

 

Salem, Viney, Melk not available

On 3/11/2021 at 9:27 PM, kev martin said:

Our practice game at Marvel, wasn't much chop.

Hoping when we play badly under the roof, we play better at the G.

Perhaps, the windy and open spaces at Casey set us up for that scenario. 

 

To say nothing of the width of the ground being the same as the G.


7 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

After Caseys final hitout tonight, heres my team for Freo

 

B         Rivers              May               Lever

HB       Hunt             Tomlinson      Hibberd

C       Langdon           Oliver              ANB

HF      Chandler          Daw            Harmes

F        Jackson          Fritsch           Pickett               

R        Gawn             Petracca         Brayshaw

IC        Jones       Bowey       Spargo     Jordon

 

Emergencies    -     Sparrow   T Mac   Petty   Jetta

 

Salem, Viney, Melk not available

You are delusional and that's a fact.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

He is being played forward.

Sorry my post was not clear enough - I believe he is suited to a forward pocket

 
29 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Umm ok

Your team is fine except that I don’t think Daw is AFL match fit ready, therefore T Mac reluctantly gets into the 22.

  • Author
10 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Your team is fine except that I don’t think Daw is AFL match fit ready, therefore T Mac reluctantly gets into the 22.

Yeah I put ANB on a wing as he can run all day, my 2nd option would have been Tomlinson. Thats how desperate we are for mids who can spread and provide a counterpoint to our inside mids.

As for Daw,  he will at least give a contest and crash packs and is riding high on his second chance.  T Mac wont do anything and hasn't since 2018.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies