Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted
12 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

this thread just got all scrambled up

whipped into a frenzy

  • Like 1

Posted
14 minutes ago, The Chazz said:

Can you guys just beat it with these egg jokes already.

It's frying my brain.


Posted
35 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

this thread just got all scrambled up

 Wonder if ye olde Chook Fowler (Number12) is unconsciously egging people on to contribute these posts. No more from me..:)


Posted
1 hour ago, Neil Crompton said:

I think it’s been an eggscellent discussion

i shell not contribute to the puns

Posted
3 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

If we do pick him up lets hope we're not left with egg on our face

That's a poultry contribution

  • Haha 3

Posted
9 minutes ago, trac5665 said:

is this melbournes matthew egan?

 

Will be a real loss.  Development of our players to be their best is our next step to being successful.

Hopefully we can get someone with a strong development background rather than a newbie who needs to develop himself and his program.  We don't have time for another coach who needs training wheels.


Posted
20 hours ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

It's hardly strange people are asking questions or commenting on an integral role within the MFC.

It would be ''strange'' not to.

It's strange that ppl are commentating, ie offering commentary on the situation, without actually knowledge.

Asking questions about the situation is perfectly reasonable. But again, those questions shouldn't be loaded with misinformation i.e. "why did he sign a contract when he knew his kids would be interstate?".


Posted
3 hours ago, deanox said:

It's strange that ppl are commentating, ie offering commentary on the situation, without actually knowledge.

Asking questions about the situation is perfectly reasonable. But again, those questions shouldn't be loaded with misinformation i.e. "why did he sign a contract when he knew his kids would be interstate?".

You might not like the line of questioning, but the discussion is hardly ''strange''.

Posted
6 hours ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

You might not like the line of questioning, but the discussion is hardly ''strange''.

Strange: odd; unusual or surprising; difficult to understand or explain.

 

It is strange that people think they should comment negatively on someone's motives or reasons for signing a contract when they don't know the full facts (and aren't even asking the questions to determine those facts).

 

That you don't think the word fits the sentence and would like to keep arguing about it is strange as well.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...