Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2020/06/26/report-bombers-saad-far-apart-on-contract-discussions/

Out of contract and no close to a new deal by the looks of it. 

He is everything that we are screaming out for. Dash from half back with clean kicking skills.

Happy to give up our 2nd rounder.

 

Essendon are notoriously hard to deal with.
They'd want Petracca.

Crossed to Essendon from Gold Coast as a 23yo for a future second round pick (ended up being pick 35).

Now 25 and hitting his prime, he wouldn't come cheap; Essendon would ask for a lot.

 

 

 

our first rounder in 2021 MIGHT get it done but, then again, essendon would demand that PLUS petracca

actually, tbh, the peptides reputation as being difficult to deal with is somewhat unfounded; for the most part they get their deals done as well as anyone else, and often more efficiently than the likes of fremantle for instance

to be honest the one i'd look at as a runner from half-back at the end of this season is rory laird

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2020/06/26/report-bombers-saad-far-apart-on-contract-discussions/

Out of contract and no close to a new deal by the looks of it. 

He is everything that we are screaming out for. Dash from half back with clean kicking skills.

Happy to give up our 2nd rounder.

Would be my second target behind a key forward, although there may be some free agent options there, but definitely keen.

 


we would be better off avoiding any trade .We don't do that  at all well .we would just end up on the wrong side of the balance sheet .The list is good enough already to perform well .

hes' solid and would take him - but they'd ask overs for sure

we need to look for a key forward (I think we have a half decent one in Smith but unfortunately he's getting used down back) 

not sure who else is out there? I'd look at raiding Adel but their list looks kinda trash 

 
2 hours ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Crossed to Essendon from Gold Coast as a 23yo for a future second round pick (ended up being pick 35).

Now 25 and hitting his prime, he wouldn't come cheap; Essendon would ask for a lot.

 

 

Give them what they need inside grunt so Sparrow and a 2 round pick


6 minutes ago, Rednblueriseing said:

Give them what they need inside grunt so Sparrow and a 2 round pick

If that’s their need, they’d ask for Brayshaw.  Whilst I wouldn’t want to do that, many would see that as fair.

 

 

28 minutes ago, Rednblueriseing said:

Give them what they need inside grunt so Sparrow and a 2 round pick

Give me Sparrow over Saad any day. 

2 hours ago, MF-C said:

hes' solid and would take him - but they'd ask overs for sure

we need to look for a key forward (I think we have a half decent one in Smith but unfortunately he's getting used down back) 

not sure who else is out there? I'd look at raiding Adel but their list looks kinda trash 

What.... ?

Edited by Ham

2 hours ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

If that’s their need, they’d ask for Brayshaw.  Whilst I wouldn’t want to do that, many would see that as fair.

would do that


Definitely should show interest just to annoy Essendon and put pressure on their salary cap.

Funny that we have two ex-Essendon players but neither could actually tell us about him from personal contact, but we also have two ex-Suns (incl an ex-co-captain Sun) who might know him a bit.

My level of interest in Saad will be entirely determined by how our little collection of smaller defender options make progress this year, although many of them are still listed on stats sites as forwards, it will be interesting to see how this season's experiments turn out.

Other than that, a lot depends on salary caps, playing numbers, and the wild swirl of chaos we are all engulfed in at present.

Hear me out here...

Brayshaw for Saad, Harmes back to the midfield.

To me, that makes us a better team.

 

28 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Hear me out here...

Brayshaw for Saad, Harmes back to the midfield.

To me, that makes us a better team.

 

If Gus doesn't perform this year that would be a sensible trade but I doubt Essendon would go for it.

Sounds like he wants decent money and with no increase in the salary cap could be a hard fit.We have some high value re-signings in 2021 IIRC.

1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

If Gus doesn't perform this year that would be a sensible trade but I doubt Essendon would go for it.

Sounds like he wants decent money and with no increase in the salary cap could be a hard fit.We have some high value re-signings in 2021 IIRC.

Have heard conflicting things about our salary cap situation (from the same journalist too, ugh), but going by Lucifer's Hero list here, our out of contract players this year are (and guessing on what will happen - while unsure of list sizes for next year):

Bedford - Likely keep
Fritsch - Keep
Hibberd - 50/50
Hannan - Keep
Hore - Likely keep
Hunt - 50/50
Jones - Retire
Jordan - Keep
OMac - 50/50
Nietschke - 50/50
Petty - Likely keep
Smith - Keep
J.Wagner - Gone
Sparrow - Keep
Spargo - Likely keep
Viney - Keep

I don't think any of the ones we're likely to keep will be in for big money. Saad's contract with the Bombers currently is only about 400k (if reported correctly) and he's clearly worth more than that. Potentially it all hinges on what Daniher decides?

 

If Daniher is leaving offer them Weideman and a draft pick.


16 minutes ago, loges said:

If Daniher is leaving offer them Weideman and a draft pick.

free agent, no need for trade; we'd just need to show him the money

still reckon he's northern states bound

and on uncontracted players i'd say:

Bedford - 50/50
Fritsch - Keep
Hibberd - 50/50
Hannan - Keep
Hore - 50/50
Hunt - likely keep
Jones - Retire
Jordan - Keep
OMac - likely keep
Nietschke - gone
Petty - Likely keep
Smith - Keep
J.Wagner - Gone
Sparrow - likely Keep
Spargo - 50/50
Viney - likely keep*

*he's a free agent so the decision is out of our hands to a greater lesser degree

i know he's apparently contracted til the end of 2021, but you can't see kk staying on a reduced list of 35 players

2 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

free agent, no need for trade; we'd just need to show him the money

still reckon he's northern states bound

I believe loges meant that with Daniher leaving; Essendon will be looking for a key forward. So Weideman + Pick traded for Saad.

8 hours ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Crossed to Essendon from Gold Coast as a 23yo for a future second round pick (ended up being pick 35).

Now 25 and hitting his prime, he wouldn't come cheap; Essendon would ask for a lot.

 

 

5 hours ago, Rednblueriseing said:

Give them what they need inside grunt so Sparrow and a 2 round pick

No way.    Sparrow might be just what we're looking for in our Mids, or anywhere else.

5 hours ago, dl4e said:

Give me Sparrow over Saad any day. 

agree dl4e.

3 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

Hear me out here...

Brayshaw for Saad, Harmes back to the midfield.

To me, that makes us a better team.

 

I'd rather try to offer Brays,  for Ben Brown at North.    [ Brayshaw + O'Baker, or future pick ]  for BBrown.

 

With the Bummers,  swap  Bray  for Parish,   plus spare change to round it out.

 

 
4 minutes ago, MyFavouriteMartian said:

I'd rather try to offer Brays,  for Ben Brown at North.    [ Brayshaw + O'Baker, or future pick ]  for BBrown.

Sounds terrible. 

1 hour ago, Lord Nev said:

Have heard conflicting things about our salary cap situation (from the same journalist too, ugh), but going by Lucifer's Hero list here, our out of contract players this year are (and guessing on what will happen - while unsure of list sizes for next year):

Bedford - Likely keep
Fritsch - Keep
Hibberd - 50/50
Hannan - Keep
Hore - Likely keep
Hunt - 50/50
Jones - Retire
Jordan - Keep
OMac - 50/50
Nietschke - 50/50
Petty - Likely keep
Smith - Keep
J.Wagner - Gone
Sparrow - Keep
Spargo - Likely keep
Viney - Keep

I don't think any of the ones we're likely to keep will be in for big money. Saad's contract with the Bombers currently is only about 400k (if reported correctly) and he's clearly worth more than that. Potentially it all hinges on what Daniher decides?

 

I'd stay away from Daniher.   While he's on the bummers list,  he's chewing on their cap space.   Which could mean we might claim another of their list.?  What about Parish,  What is Fantasia like.?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 50 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies