Jump to content

Featured Replies

TMac should go back.

Play him in the back line where he made his name.

Bring Joel Smith to the forward line.

 

Play Weid off the bench.

 
On 6/19/2020 at 6:43 PM, Pates said:

Going to start this by saying I think he still has the goods in him to get back to being a good power forward. Perhaps not the 50+ goal a year forward we need but still capable of 30-40+.

Having said that Tom has been poor for a while now. Like others he had injury issues coming into 2019 which made him start slow and aside from the Carlton game which he subsequently got injured, he never really played a game worth noting. Now in 2020, with a full pre-season of fitness under his belt, he has started with two poor games. The question in the title says it all: how long do we wait for him to turn it around?

This could potentially tie in with Weiderman and how he isn't being played, where if Tom's poor form continues and maybe if Sam is banging down the door, perhaps Sam takes on the full mantle of the FF role. 

I have long believed that Tom's form is massively linked to our ability to compete with the best, without a key forward target taking grabs, we look really lost as a team.

Taking the line from the page heading..We dont ... Package him and his Brother of and get players who can KICK GOALS.. LOTS OF THEM!

Jacob Weitering has been having a stellar season and added another scalp this season, Tmac has another 2 weeks before going back....

 

Tom is a gun but looks sore to me. He has the turning circle of a truck at the moment but I still think we're a better side with him in it.

35 minutes ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

Tom is a gun but looks sore to me. He has the turning circle of a truck at the moment but I still think we're a better side with him in it.

No Tom isn't a Gun, he is a bloke that had a good season and was almost out the door, he found life going forward but hasn't fired a shot for since 2018.  The big concern is marking, he always has been a good contested mark, now he just can't grab them and is being pushed off the ball to easy.

We put all our eggs in the 2018 finals combination of Weid and TMac, we have no developing tall forwards at our Club, Jackson will be a ruck not forward, even Petty is a defender that we are trying to do a Tmac with and make him a forward.  


On 6/19/2020 at 11:24 PM, Pennant St Dee said:

Let's not rewrite history to suit the narrative

Our defence badly needed fixing, defence is what wins you premierships, we went on a nice run in 2018  without Hogan but let's be honest we weren't really up there with the top 3 other sides.

and and here are some facts

Hogan wanted to get back to Perth, Melbourne did not move him on, but they saw an opportunity to fix our biggest deficiency.

Watts needed to be moved and you will find a big call and say was made by the leadership group, in this. A big statement re committment by senior players was required 

Goals win premierships. 

20 minutes ago, drdrake said:

No Tom isn't a Gun, he is a bloke that had a good season and was almost out the door, he found life going forward but hasn't fired a shot for since 2018.  The big concern is marking, he always has been a good contested mark, now he just can't grab them and is being pushed off the ball to easy.

We put all our eggs in the 2018 finals combination of Weid and TMac, we have no developing tall forwards at our Club, Jackson will be a ruck not forward, even Petty is a defender that we are trying to do a Tmac with and make him a forward.  

He's not getting near it and isn't getting anywhere near the space he had in 2018. His ability to catch the thing hasn't gone anywhere - he's not moving well at all and that's his strength, his ability to run his man around and still have plenty in the tank.

7 minutes ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

He's not getting near it and isn't getting anywhere near the space he had in 2018. His ability to catch the thing hasn't gone anywhere - he's not moving well at all and that's his strength, his ability to run his man around and still have plenty in the tank.

So lets stop picking him for the player he was.

 

Just read the thread and a few thoughts on various posts.

1. In regards to May.
Many players get drafted as forwards, can't cut it and get tried back.
May might be able to pinch hit but that'll be it.
Pretty sure TMac was drafted as a forward also, the pinch hitter that got stuck there.

2. Tmac was terrifying coming out've defence with the ball.
He either got caught or butchered the kick.
He also did best up forward when he worked wth Hogan both using their aerobic abiliities to run their opponents up and down the ground.
Hasn't been near as successful as the stay at home KP as we know.
 
3. Saty .... We did bomb the hell out've the forward line in 2018 and previous.
Goodwin even called it "Chaos Ball."
Very few of our goals were created with precision, it was like watching rugby most the time.

4. We do have a potential tall mobile forward in Jackson if he comes on.
 

37 minutes ago, My name is legion said:

Goals win premierships. 

As do big forwards who can take a big grabs when the Hail Marys are coming in.


On 6/19/2020 at 2:54 PM, Deestar9 said:

At the moment...Jeremy Cameron says hi ?it is & will be a bizarre season ...let’s give the players a bit of leeway for a few weeks ...

Jeremy has not re-signed with the Giants yet. I'd put a bit of money on MFC spending big to return him South. We need a big key forward and big key forwards need to be needed.

58 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

As do big forwards who can take a big grabs when the Hail Marys are coming in.

And if we kick all our goals by our small players,  during H&A games...  and then bring-in another tall for finals,  as other clubs have already stated to use a smaller back-line structure.

Speed kills.  as do mismatches.

Edited by MyFavouriteMartian

1 hour ago, Fork 'em said:

Just read the thread and a few thoughts on various posts.

1. In regards to May.
Many players get drafted as forwards, can't cut it and get tried back.
May might be able to pinch hit but that'll be it.
Pretty sure TMac was drafted as a forward also, the pinch hitter that got stuck there.

2. Tmac was terrifying coming out've defence with the ball.
He either got caught or butchered the kick.
He also did best up forward when he worked wth Hogan both using their aerobic abiliities to run their opponents up and down the ground.
Hasn't been near as successful as the stay at home KP as we know.
 
3. Saty .... We did bomb the hell out've the forward line in 2018 and previous.
Goodwin even called it "Chaos Ball."
Very few of our goals were created with precision, it was like watching rugby most the time.

4. We do have a potential tall mobile forward in Jackson if he comes on.
 

i think we should manage Jackson the same way Gold Coast and the Saints have done with the King twins.

Give him a year or two in the Magoos and solid gym work before playing him again.

I would give Tom another game and then it is over to Weids to have a fair crack at it. If he still has it Tom will work his way back into the side. Just treat him with respect and the rest is up to him and a spot opening up. 

10 minutes ago, chook fowler said:

i think we should manage Jackson the same way Gold Coast and the Saints have done with the King twins.

Give him a year or two in the Magoos and solid gym work before playing him again.

After... he extends his contract.


On 6/19/2020 at 9:08 PM, Pates said:

Difference is the JC has a lot more seasons backed up, Tom has one outstanding season and half a season where he started his swing forward.

JC's had about 2,000 pre-seasons to get it right.

13 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

I would give Tom another game and then it is over to Weids to have a fair crack at it. If he still has it Tom will work his way back into the side. Just treat him with respect and the rest is up to him and a spot opening up. 

I doubt either McDonald or Weideman will succeed if they are the only tall forward. I'd like to see them play together. It still might not work, but I think there's a much better chance of success if they are sharing the load.  After all, Tom played his best football forward when he was the second tall. Now he's the only tall, and it becomes a different game for him altogether.

Mind you, if he gets his body right, Petty might overtake both of them and in the not too distant future it might be a Petty/Jackson tall forward combination.

30 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

JC's had about 2,000 pre-seasons to get it right.

I doubt either McDonald or Weideman will succeed if they are the only tall forward. I'd like to see them play together. It still might not work, but I think there's a much better chance of success if they are sharing the load.  After all, Tom played his best football forward when he was the second tall. Now he's the only tall, and it becomes a different game for him altogether.

Mind you, if he gets his body right, Petty might overtake both of them and in the not too distant future it might be a Petty/Jackson tall forward combination.

Agree on Petty. He looked like he could hold his body in the key forward post and had some presence of those around him. Early days but hold some hope. Get him to watch old footage of highly respected Mark Maclure play the position

1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

i think we should manage Jackson the same way Gold Coast and the Saints have done with the King twins.

Give him a year or two in the Magoos and solid gym work before playing him again.

It is the Kings second year. They never played a year or two in the seconds. The StKilda King didn't play last year due to an ACL and the GC King played 14 senior game last year. I think you should re-evaluate your management plan.

1 hour ago, Grimes Times said:

It is the Kings second year. They never played a year or two in the seconds. The StKilda King didn't play last year due to an ACL and the GC King played 14 senior game last year. I think you should re-evaluate your management plan.

My bad. However, Jackson looks far from ready.

2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

 

JC's had about 2,000 pre-seasons to get it right.

 

And were still trying to wear low cut boots.   Some things never change.

Ps: can someone please talk to him about that aura-ring on his head.  It just does not go with our jumper.


Tmac can help our forward line out immensely if used correctly. He does however need to be fit and able to make long leads up the ground all day, creating space behind him, which opens up our forward line. He isn't he answer for us as a goal kicking forward, but he can still be used to improve our forward line. Just have to use him right. Keeping him out of the 50 not only opens it up, but drags out an additional defender that only becomes a burden when we do bomb it in (which we do all day). If we are going to continue to bomb it into our forward 50 (which nothing suggests we won't), then we need to open it up and give ourselves a chance. Otherwise its just more inside 50's that go no where. 

Edited by KingDingAling

On 6/21/2020 at 9:39 PM, Every Game in '64 said:

TMac should go back.

Play him in the back line where he made his name.

Bring Joel Smith to the forward line.

 

Play Weid off the bench.

So you are happy to wait another 55 years for our next flag then 64?

On 6/22/2020 at 1:11 PM, drdrake said:

No Tom isn't a Gun, he is a bloke that had a good season and was almost out the door, he found life going forward but hasn't fired a shot for since 2018.  The big concern is marking, he always has been a good contested mark, now he just can't grab them and is being pushed off the ball to easy.

We put all our eggs in the 2018 finals combination of Weid and TMac, we have no developing tall forwards at our Club, Jackson will be a ruck not forward, even Petty is a defender that we are trying to do a Tmac with and make him a forward.  

Ty Dr.  Can't argue with any of that.

 
On 6/22/2020 at 2:23 PM, Grr-owl said:

Jeremy has not re-signed with the Giants yet. I'd put a bit of money on MFC spending big to return him South. We need a big key forward and big key forwards need to be needed.

One can only hope Grr

On 6/22/2020 at 3:39 PM, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

JC's had about 2,000 pre-seasons to get it right.

I doubt either McDonald or Weideman will succeed if they are the only tall forward. I'd like to see them play together. It still might not work, but I think there's a much better chance of success if they are sharing the load.  After all, Tom played his best football forward when he was the second tall. Now he's the only tall, and it becomes a different game for him altogether.

Mind you, if he gets his body right, Petty might overtake both of them and in the not too distant future it might be a Petty/Jackson tall forward combination.

They have played together a number of times from recollection LDv.  Aside from a few patches in 2nd half of 2018, when the whole team was up and about, i can't recall them kicking bags of goals (or even a decent return consistently) between them.

We need a MOBILE marking geniune KF or two who are capable of taking regular contested / pack marks and can finish off (honour) the good work thats getting the ball inside 50 so often (incentive).

So far the only player on our list who i've seen show small glimpses of looking like a 'Genuine' one of those on occasions and presents as a mobile marking / target....has been Petty.  The one player who should be getting more game time (trialled) here but can't get on the park (yes a bit of MFCSS)


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies