Jump to content

Ricciuto on Lever


Demonland

Recommended Posts

I was really keen for Lever. Was happy with the price at the time.

He injured his knee again which changes everything. Of course Adelaide are ok with it. 

No one would say that we have gotten value out of the trade as yet.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BAMF said:

I was really keen for Lever. Was happy with the price at the time.

He injured his knee again which changes everything. Of course Adelaide are ok with it. 

No one would say that we have gotten value out of the trade as yet.

Agree.

I seem to recall many here on Demonland doing cartwheels at the time we first signed him.

How quickly some turn on these guys after a bit of misfortune injury and/or form wise.

Still pleanty of time for him to get back to his best.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

I can live with the money although five years was perhaps excessive but the draft picks....grrrr

Much the same can be said about May

Anyway ... we will know the answers by seasons end

The verdict is still out untill they both get a clear run at it without injuries 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Agree.

I seem to recall many here on Demonland doing cartwheels at the time we first signed him.

How quickly some turn on these guys after a bit of misfortune injury and/or form wise.

Still pleanty of time for him to get back to his best.

And many others were critical of paying so much for a 3rd tall who’d already done a knee.  No hindsight, critical at the time. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, goodwindees said:

And many others were critical of paying so much for a 3rd tall who’d already done a knee.  No hindsight, critical at the time. 

On that basis you would want Gawn and Trac either right?

Having knees are not the career ending injury they once were.  Particularly since Lever had played a fair few trouble free seasons at the Crows, I think the club are/were taking a pretty fair bet on that basis.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Lever, Pick 37 and Pick 47.

FOR

Pick 10 (2017), pick 19 (2018) and Pick 59 (2018)

 


So, it ended up being...

Jack Lever, Harrison Petty and Matthew Parker (StKilda)

FOR

Lochie O'brien (Carlton), Liam Stocker (Carlton) and Brett Bewley (Fremantle).

 

Looks fine to me.

As deanox said in the other Lever thread (do we really need multiple Lever threads), the points equivalent was Lever and 72 for pick 8.

So unlike dazzle says, it wasn't two first round picks, it was one.

And even if it was two, we went out to find an A-grade player and sometimes that costs a bit (picks and/or salary cap). Hindsight reasoning is so frustrating, and Demonland engages in it all the time when it comes to drafting/trading. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ricciuto's comments are somewhat embarrassing for a football club director and they’ve already been disputed by the manager of two of the players he criticized in Charlie Cameron and Mitch McGovern. Colin Young pointed to the club’s infamous 2018 training camp, which was ‘cult-like’ and left several players distraught, as a key reason for the departures.

The problem is that the Crows haven’t been setting the world on fire on the field so Ricciuto would be better advised to keep his trap shut and not try to emulate Jeff Kennett who at least runs a club that’s tasted some success in recent years.

He should be doing his job as football director and concentrate on the task of getting his mob off the bottom of the ladder or thereabouts.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

On that basis you would want Gawn and Trac either right?

Having knees are not the career ending injury they once were.  Particularly since Lever had played a fair few trouble free seasons at the Crows, I think the club are/were taking a pretty fair bet on that basis.

What an absurd & stupid comparison.  Gawn & Trac were Draftees that we recruited for nothing in precisely, or in perhaps an even better position for us than what they were predicted to go.  
As opposed to having to grossly overpay a 3rd tall defender to pry him out of his Club.

Look, you were a well known supporter of the Lever trade and you are soon going to have to realise that he is just a good, ordinary 3rd tall defender that you Draft at around Pick 30 - 40 and you pay $400 - 450k pa tops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, goodwindees said:

What an absurd & stupid comparison.  Gawn & Trac were Draftees that we recruited for nothing in precisely, or in perhaps an even better position for us than what they were predicted to go.  
As opposed to having to grossly overpay a 3rd tall defender to pry him out of his Club.

Look, you were a well known supporter of the Lever trade and you are soon going to have to realise that he is just a good, ordinary 3rd tall defender that you Draft at around Pick 30 - 40 and you pay $400 - 450k pa tops. 

3 points 

1 That is @Rodney (Balls) Grinter opinion, so it is neither right or wrong

2 How does Ricciuto know how much Lever is being paid, like everyone on here, he is guessing

3 All players have taken a pay cut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, goodwindees said:

What an absurd & stupid comparison.  Gawn & Trac were Draftees that we recruited for nothing in precisely, or in perhaps an even better position for us than what they were predicted to go.  
As opposed to having to grossly overpay a 3rd tall defender to pry him out of his Club.

Look, you were a well known supporter of the Lever trade and you are soon going to have to realise that he is just a good, ordinary 3rd tall defender that you Draft at around Pick 30 - 40 and you pay $400 - 450k pa tops. 

I don't think it's an absurd or stupid comparison at all and you are missing the point I'm trying to make, which is that both Gawn and Trac have provided a number of years of good/great service since having knee reconstructions (several in Gawn's case), so it's not like a club should steer totally clear of any player that has had a knee reconstruction in the past.

To be honest, I wasn't a supporter of the Lever trade.  Having not really paid any particular attention to Lever at Adelaide, I was fairly neutral on it at the time.  There were plenty on this forum who were a huge rap for him though and suggested it was an absolute coupe that the MFC landed him.

2019 was a stinker all around and I think it is fair to state that both Lever and May haven't really provided value for money returns just yet, but I still think there is plenty of oppertunity for both these players to make really solid contributions to the team that could justify the coin we spent on them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either way MFC paid overs for both Lever & May, heavily invested in defenders & one questions we let Frost go who would not have cost anywhere near 800K & perhaps used it to lure a Forward after losing Hogan....But why would you want to do that when you building your side around Tom Mac a proven FF after 1 season  along with Weidermab who can't get a game!

We forget as usual the MFC strategy/game plan was halted when the  AFL changed the rules to 6,6,6 & Lever was a great intercept mark.

 

Edited by Hogan2014
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huge respect for Ricciuto the player.  But wow what a muppet of a football administrator.  His public comments on these matters reek of sore looser in much the same was as Tex Walker's dummy spit after some of these players like Lever left.

Wouldn't take much for him to use a bit of diplomacy and just play a straight bat to some of these questions and assertions, along the lines of "We were comfortable and stand by the decisions we made regarding the particular circumstances of each player" and then just leave it at that.  A wise local footy coach I knew had a wise philosophy of not paying out on any players that left the club, because if they departed on good terms, they may often come back at some stage.  I think it works slightly differently in the AFL, but I can't see many players being attracted to a club with senior officials that carry on like that.

I read that poor old Ricciuto also had a bit of a public spat with Crows club legend Andrew McCleod who is also currently employed by the Crow over public critisisms that McLeod had made about cultural problems with the club.  All this airing if dirty laundry just doesn't really reflect well on the Crows as all - perhaps they have taken the new mantle as basket case cub of the AFL?

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Ricciuto's comments are somewhat embarrassing for a football club director and they’ve already been disputed by the manager of two of the players he criticized in Charlie Cameron and Mitch McGovern. Colin Young pointed to the club’s infamous 2018 training camp, which was ‘cult-like’ and left several players distraught, as a key reason for the departures.

The problem is that the Crows haven’t been setting the world on fire on the field so Ricciuto would be better advised to keep his trap shut and not try to emulate Jeff Kennett who at least runs a club that’s tasted some success in recent years.

He should be doing his job as football director and concentrate on the task of getting his mob off the bottom of the ladder or thereabouts.

I reckon he's gone a bit Donald Trump. He should start circulating rumours about the AFL deep state next and how he is draining the swamp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching the news tonight I heard someone say something relevant to this subject. "The only good thing coming out of South Australia is the road to Victoria." ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hogan2014 said:

Either way MFC paid overs for both Lever & May, heavily invested in defenders & one questions we let Frost go who would not have cost anywhere near 800K & perhaps used it to lure a Forward after losing Hogan....But why would you want to do that when you building your side around Tom Mac a proven FF after 1 season  along with Weidermab who can't get a game!

We forget as usual the MFC strategy/game plan was halted when the  AFL changed the rules to 6,6,6 & Lever was a great intercept mark.

 

This is a great point. We traded for Lever when we were playing a purely zone defense. No one on one's. The 666 meant we needed to rethink that and we traded for May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Is a detour the same as a derail? I'm curious. Brayshaw slags Adelaide, Roo slags everyone in response. Would the peeps on here prefer our board or management behaved more in that way or not? Serious question. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Skuit said:

Is a detour the same as a derail? I'm curious. Brayshaw slags Adelaide, Roo slags everyone in response. Would the peeps on here prefer our board or management behaved more in that way or not? Serious question. 

roo is a loose cannon

it's highly enjoyable watching that franchise implode

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is allowed. Was my personal perception at the time with absolutely no evidence to back it up whatsoever. Lived in West Lakes, had Footy Park membership, went to almost every Crows' game in their first eight years. Roo was on the juice. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ProperDee said:

Any other club in the comp would take him in a heartbeat.

At his age nobody would pick up May's contract based on his output since becoming a demon. If they would we should trade him in a heartbeat. He is not a good lock down defender and and we have others who do what he does as well or better and cheaper. His mistakes are costly and he makes too many of them. The next time the Dee's are competitive in the finals May will not be in the team.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this stage all Mark R is doing  is trying to justify his role and Adelaide's policy of not paying its players "overs" to keep them.

If that means losing them so be it and he thinks that's all there is to it.

However he refuses to reconcile that WHY are they leaving what many thought was a very strong and well run organisation in 2017 ( even after the Tippett affair) of overpayment and salary cap/ draft penalty /ies.

Of course since Losing the 2017 Final the following Has occurred  

(1) Hugely stressful and even racist happenings to players At a Camp Trying to gain a leading edge on other Clubs

(2) Very poor administration Trying to hide drink driving  charges  Of Steglein

(3) Another Camp error at Barossa breaking Covid-19 rules 

and (4) things like the Tex Dummy spits and Andrew Macleod unwelcome expressions.

Approximately a dozen players have either requested leave from the Club as a result of its pay program and Camp handling of refusing to acknowledge full blame.

in addition a highly confidential outside enquiry at end of 2019 resulted in officials like Brett Burton parting or being shown the door.

Three people have remained constants at the Crows ALL this time Chairman Rod Chapman, CEO Andrew Fagan and Football Director/Board Member Mark Ricuitto ( seemingly untouchable ).

Snd that a result of why Roo is trying to hide some real facts instead of joining His Chairman and taking his CEO in calling it a day at this seasons end.

And that's all we are aware of!!!

The Club is now at its lowest ebb in its 29 year history but does have 5 draft picks in the first 25 in the 2020 National Draft so a quick rebound could be possible if the right recruits are obtained to overcome a solid but not pacy midfield.

Roo has lashed  out unwisely in Trying to protect the Crows without the full story being told in my IMO.

 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Once again the club’s top goal scorer but he had a few uncharacteristic flat spots during the season and the club will be looking for much better from him in 2025. Date of Birth: 6 December 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 149 Goals MFC 2024: 41 Career Total: 252 Brownlow Medal Votes: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #18 Jake Melksham

    After sustaining a torn ACL in the final match of the 2023 season Jake added a bit to the attack late in the 2024 season upon his return. He has re-signed on to the Demons for 1 more season in 2025. Date of Birth: 12 August 1991 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 229 Goals MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 188

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #3 Christian Salem

    The luckless Salem suffered a hamstring injury against the Lions early in the season and, after missing a number of games, he was never at his best. He was also inconvenienced by minor niggles later in the season. This was a blow for the club that sorely needed him to fill gaps in the midfield at times as well as to do his best work in defence. Date of Birth: 15 July 1995 Height: 184cm Games MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 176 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 26 Brownlow Meda

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7

    2024 Player Reviews: #39 Koltyn Tholstrop

    The first round draft pick at #13 from twelve months ago the strongly built medium forward has had an impressive introduction to AFL football and is expected to spend more midfield moments as his career progresses. Date of Birth: 25 July 2005 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 10 Goals MFC 2024: 5 Career Total: 5 Games CDFC 2024: 7 Goals CDFC 2024: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 6

    2024 Player Reviews: #42 Daniel Turner

    The move of “Disco” to a key forward post looks like bearing fruit. Turner has good hands, moves well and appears to be learning the forward craft well. Will be an interesting watch in 2025. Date of Birth: January 28, 2002 Height: 195cm Games MFC 2024: 15 Career Total: 18 Goals MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 17 Games CDFC 2024: 1 Goals CDFC 2024:  1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 15

    2024 Player Reviews: #8 Jake Lever

    The Demon’s key defender and backline leader had his share of injuries and niggles throughout the season which prevented him from performing at his peak.  Date of Birth: 5 March 1996 Height: 195cm Games MFC 2024: 18 Career Total: 178 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 5

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 1

    2024 Player Reviews: #13 Clayton Oliver

    Lack of preparation after a problematic preseason prevented Oliver from reaching the high standards set before last year’s hamstring woes. He carried injury right through the back half of the season and was controversially involved in a potential move during the trade period that was ultimately shut down by the club. Date of Birth:  22 July 1997 Height:  189cm Games MFC 2024:  21 Career Total: 183 Goals MFC 2024: 3 Career Total: 54 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 17

    BLOODY BLUES by Meggs

    The conclusion to Narrm’s home and away season was the inevitable let down by the bloody Blues  who meekly capitulated to the Bombers.   The 2024 season fixture handicapped the Demons chances from the get-go with Port Adelaide, Brisbane and Essendon advantaged with enough gimme games to ensure a tough road to the finals, especially after a slew of early season injuries to star players cost wins and percentage.     As we strode confidently through the gates of Prin

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    2024 Player Reviews: #5 Christian Petracca

    Melbourne’s most important player who dominated the first half of the season until his untimely injury in the Kings Birthday clash put an end to his season. At the time, he was on his way to many personal honours and the club in strong finals contention. When the season did end for Melbourne and Petracca was slowly recovering, he was engulfed in controversy about a possible move of clubs amid claims about his treatment by the club in the immediate aftermath of his injury. Date of Birth: 4 J

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 21
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...