Dangerfield in a sling

[dice 566]

Spot the difference:

 

 

 

 

[dice 566]

Changed his tune from 9 years ago:

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/that-s-afl-footy-dangerfield-had-no-problem-with-burgoyne-tackle-20200612-p5527x.html

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/demons-to-appeal-trengove-suspension-20110511-1ehzx.html

"Notman said the medical report detailing Dangerfield's injury was the most damaging evidence produced at the tribunal hearing"

[dice 566]

And let's not forget Dangerfield got BOG the following week. So much for serious concussion

[DemonWheels 974]

Should get multiple weeks for that. But of course if the player gets up and plays on the AFL won’t punish. 

[daisycutter 28,663]

as the commentator said "there wouldn't be any malice in that from burgoyne, he thought he still had the ball"

there are always protected species, clubs

it was exactly the tackle the law was brought in to stop

if there is any consistency (joke) he has to be suspended

[Demonstone 19,567]

12 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

if there is any consistency (joke) he has to be suspended

Agree 100%, dc.

[Sideshow Bob 2,163]

Still can't believe Jack got suspended for that.

100% perfect tackle. Should have had a free his way for dropping the ball

[Demonland 66,180]

 

[Dr. Gonzo 22,572]

4 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

Haha you've got to be [censored] kidding me

[Hampton 22 519]

It was a reckless, dangerous tackle that was completely unnecessary. The AFL is weak if he gets anything less than a couple of weeks. And how ridiculous that the penalty depends on the outcome. Whether or not Burgoyne thought Dangerfield had the ball is irrelevant - there’s a duty of care. 

[brendan 3,400]

How on earth did he only get a fine unbelievable 

[Salems Lot 2,392]

Kangaroo Court

[daisycutter 28,663]

well that sets the tone for dangerous tackles for the rest of the season

#dangeroustacklescount    #concussionmatters    #protecthehead    #protectedspecies

[monoccular 16,328]

13 hours ago, brendan said:

How on earth did he only get a fine unbelievable 

Is that a serious question?

What colours does he wear?

[Demonland 66,180]

 

[Ethan Tremblay 28,488]

Double standards much? 

[drysdale demon 4,193]

12 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Double standards much? 

In the AFL? surely not.

[dice 566]

Our prelim hero Jordan Lewis said there was "no double action" and it was a "well executed tackle"!

https://player.whooshkaa.com/player/playlist/show/1919?visual=true&sharing=true&episode=674266

W*****R.

[dice 566]

Absolute farce:

https://www.afl.com.au/news/449921/silk-s-danger-ous-tackle-forces-afl-to-make-shock-rule-tweak

[Pates 9,537]

14 minutes ago, dice said:

Absolute farce:

https://www.afl.com.au/news/449921/silk-s-danger-ous-tackle-forces-afl-to-make-shock-rule-tweak

There shouldn't be a rule tweak here, the players know what they are not allowed to do. The AFL should be retrospectively be appealing and he should get one week. Honestly such a joke and every player that gets done for it now (what's the bet Viney will next week) should feel rightly p****d off that Burgoyne got away with a suspension.  

[Cards13 9,117]

What’s the phrase the AFL has used for the last ~5 years? Essentially about personally accountability of the player to not looking to hurt the other player.

Ffs because it is PB he gets a free ride, Viney cops the punishment.