Jump to content

Featured Replies

18 hours ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

He played well that day and it was a great win, but... his last touch was a clear throw that he was very lucky to get away with.

If the umpire was even slightly tuned-in, it would have been a Hawthorn shot on goal at the siren.

 

 

See above 39...  the Hawks have been dishing this rubbish up for a good decade or longer and mostly getting away with it.  All power to anyone in the red & blue who has caught on, pushing the envelope and getting away with it most of the time, helping to clear congestion more often vs getting caught and pinged for dragging ball in or another stoppage closer to opp's goal giving them a chance to clear and score.

 
17 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

If he is committed to leaving GWS, someone forgot to tell him.

There is no reason to shadow box at this stage if he wanted to/accepted he was leaving.  He sounds very genuine that he desperately wants to stay. 

 
4 hours ago, binman said:

Agree. I think Smith was a big loss this year. I really rate him and have tge feeking tbat wirh some luck with injury he could become something special.

I don't really rate him that highly...he has the athletic abilities a bit like Frost but better in the air.

When played forward in real games he just got in the way and didn't have any ability to read the play.

Played elsewhere he got caught out of position, with decision making and execution poor.

32 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Crikey.  So we're thinking of bringing in damaged goods (psychologically)?  Not exactly the best mind set to start off at a new club.


34 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

13 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

If he is committed to leaving GWS, someone forgot to tell him.

There is no reason to shadow box at this stage if he wanted to/accepted he was leaving.  He sounds very genuine that he desperately wants to stay. 

Weird that his own Mum would come out after the Grand Final saying that was his last game for GWS then.

Reckon Tommo is just saying what he thinks are the right things IMO.

 

14 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

If he is committed to leaving GWS, someone forgot to tell him.

There is no reason to shadow box at this stage if he wanted to/accepted he was leaving.  He sounds very genuine that he desperately wants to stay. 

He was headed to St Kilda...that fell apart.

I think we are the fall back as GWS want to move him on.

22 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

 

Weird that his own Mum would come out after the Grand Final saying that was his last game for GWS then.

Reckon Tommo is just saying what he thinks are the right things IMO.

He knows GWS need the $cap space and are moving him on.  I would think the right things to say are how much he enjoyed GWS but looking forward to the next chapter of his life. 

The interview had the markings of someone who hasn't accepted he is being shown the door.

21 minutes ago, rjay said:

He was headed to St Kilda...that fell apart.

I think we are the fall back as GWS want to move him on.

Must be difficult to know his club is closing the door and there is only one club (17th on the ladder) that is embracing him.

If he comes I hope he cheers up about it. 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 
6 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

He knows GWS need the $cap space and are moving him on.  I would think the right things to say are how much he enjoyed GWS but looking forward to the next chapter of his life. 

The interview had the markings of someone who hasn't accepted he is being shown the door.

Technically, if he hasn't had his exit interview yet then he may not have been shown the door at this stage.

 

We should have grabbed him instead of Dom Tyson years ago.

He has been home sick for years. But hung around because the money was good.

He kicks well and marks well overhead, I don't think his pace is all that good, but he can certainly read the play.


15 hours ago, Rusty Nails said:

You are a harsh critic Mach.

As Garry said in the commentary, "courage" to put himself in a position to intercept.  Took possession, baulked two or three Hawks, used pace to run into space and lowered vision to hit up Lockhart.  Not too shabby for a tall gangly giraffe i reckon.

2nd bit of desperation play did involve an amount of luck with a loose ball but that's often the case with the random oval.  Can go in any direction.  He dived to trap it and yes threw the ball but tried to make it look a tad legit (poorly i guess but who cares...umpire blind sided as often they are and got away with it).  The Hawks, Eagles and others (eg., Doggies especially in their 2016 premiership year) have been tossing / throwing / chucking the ball out of congestion for decades (Hawks / Essendrug and Eagles the original experts imv) and escaping congestion quicker than many other teams (prior to those teams catching on) giving them a huge advantage vs others that mostly tended not to and tried to use traditional more correct methods most of the time (ie., we were one!).  We finally start to catch on and utilise the same tactics and you want to kill it off / criticise it?  Lordy lordy.

Each to their own i guess.

 

Courage? It's his role. He has no fear of making a mistake, as he makes them consistently.
Took possession. Baulked is putting it kindly. Through dumb luck (not design) the red seas parted, and he's gifted with the agility to take advantage of that. Hit the right target. He has done some things right, but he is afforded too much credit for this play.

He was lucky, but the act itself was an incredibly stupid decision. Right in front of goal, and he decides to launch his body headfirst at the legs of others. He has practically begged to have a decision made against him, and has only succeeded by the incompetence of the umpire.

Frosty has been capable of moments of sheer brilliance, but it is often a result of combining his supreme athleticism with sheer luck.
And far too often he demoralises his teammates but making dumbfounding decisions while they're pushing hard to provide options further afield, ultimately catching them out of position and leaking easy goals.

It's time to let him be somebody else's problem.

24 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

 

Courage? It's his role. He has no fear of making a mistake, as he makes them consistently.
Took possession. Baulked is putting it kindly. Through dumb luck (not design) the red seas parted, and he's gifted with the agility to take advantage of that. Hit the right target. He has done some things right, but he is afforded too much credit for this play.

He was lucky, but the act itself was an incredibly stupid decision. Right in front of goal, and he decides to launch his body headfirst at the legs of others. He has practically begged to have a decision made against him, and has only succeeded by the incompetence of the umpire.

Frosty has been capable of moments of sheer brilliance, but it is often a result of combining his supreme athleticism with sheer luck.
And far too often he demoralises his teammates but making dumbfounding decisions while they're pushing hard to provide options further afield, ultimately catching them out of position and leaking easy goals.

It's time to let him be somebody else's problem.

Fair enough Mack. Very happy to agree to disagree on those two passages of play.

1 hour ago, markc said:

Shows how much these guys are paid if he's managed to buy a place in Balmain at the age of 26. :blink:

Short Tomlinson update from the Herald Sun:

MELBOURNE are likely to secure GWS free agent Adam Tomlinson on Saturday after the Giants best-and-fairest award.

He will join the club on a four-year deal worth around $500,000 a season


  • Author
1 minute ago, Wiseblood said:

Short Tomlinson update from the Herald Sun:

MELBOURNE are likely to secure GWS free agent Adam Tomlinson on Saturday after the Giants best-and-fairest award.

He will join the club on a four-year deal worth around $500,000 a season

A good get for the Dees. Solid role player who will add professionalism, leadership and experience to our side.

1 hour ago, Wiseblood said:

Short Tomlinson update from the Herald Sun:

MELBOURNE are likely to secure GWS free agent Adam Tomlinson on Saturday after the Giants best-and-fairest award.

He will join the club on a four-year deal worth around $500,000 a season

Average wage was 362k a year (2018 stats) so that figure will probably be about 400k next year. I think that's ok. He's worth just slightly more than the average player. 

Edited by The Lobster Effect
Typo

He's a solid citizen who's played in three preliminary finals and a GF in the last 4 years and was the Giants best player (and arguably best afield) in the 2017 prelim.  He'll be good for the Demons.

On 10/1/2019 at 4:22 PM, rjay said:

I don't really rate him that highly...he has the athletic abilities a bit like Frost but better in the air.

When played forward in real games he just got in the way and didn't have any ability to read the play.

Played elsewhere he got caught out of position, with decision making and execution poor.

Agreed.

People are enthusiastic about Smith’s return and I don’t wanna rain on the parade... I just don’t think I’ve ever seen him play a good game in the firsts.


2 hours ago, Swooper1987 said:

He's a solid citizen who's played in three preliminary finals and a GF in the last 4 years and was the Giants best player (and arguably best afield) in the 2017 prelim.  He'll be good for the Demons.

Where’s his best position. I have seen him play CHF and was ok.  But his finals were terrible.  He missed targets. He played reserve ruck and looked slow. Maybe was out of position.  Definitely not a wingman as some on D-land have suggested. 

15 hours ago, Mach5 said:

 

Courage? It's his role. He has no fear of making a mistake, as he makes them consistently.
Took possession. Baulked is putting it kindly. Through dumb luck (not design) the red seas parted, and he's gifted with the agility to take advantage of that. Hit the right target. He has done some things right, but he is afforded too much credit for this play.

He was lucky, but the act itself was an incredibly stupid decision. Right in front of goal, and he decides to launch his body headfirst at the legs of others. He has practically begged to have a decision made against him, and has only succeeded by the incompetence of the umpire.

Frosty has been capable of moments of sheer brilliance, but it is often a result of combining his supreme athleticism with sheer luck.
And far too often he demoralises his teammates but making dumbfounding decisions while they're pushing hard to provide options further afield, ultimately catching them out of position and leaking easy goals.

It's time to let him be somebody else's problem.

That's exactly it, mountains of natural ability, but cant consistently execute basic fundamentals of the game, or stick to the game plan and as a result his special moments are overshadowed by his shocking ones. 

11 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Where’s his best position. I have seen him play CHF and was ok.  But his finals were terrible.  He missed targets. He played reserve ruck and looked slow. Maybe was out of position.  Definitely not a wingman as some on D-land have suggested. 

I think he's a bit like Tom McDonald.  An elite runner, not likely to kick as many goals as Tom but a competent KP player who needs some freedom through the middle. Many of TMac's really good games were when he started on the wing and drifted forward.  I think Tomlinson can be similar - maybe more effective back than forward.  What he will do is present as an option down the line.  This season other than Gawn, we had nobody do that consistently. I've watched him for a few seasons and while he's no star, I believe he will make us a better side.

 

if reports are correct about 500K I am very happy the club have managed to tempt him to us without selling the farm.  Almost impossible to trade a good quality AFL regular for less than 500.  remember Dawes on 500K per year 5 years ago?  oh dear


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 126 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 305 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies