Jump to content

Featured Replies

10 minutes ago, Ouch! said:

The way I read it is that May's camp has said that he wants to be traded, and GCN are saying to all clubs we are listening.

They still know that Melbourne probably the best option based on having the best picks to offer and want the player. May would just be waiting for the Neale deal to kick it off... not really that much in the statement.

The Demons not even mentioned by Cameron despite Mahoney’s previous very public declaration of our interest. 

Clear shift away from Melbourne. Suns open to all viable offers now that the Hogan trade looks dead and buried.

Edited by EnterTheDragon

 

My "gut feel" is very different to Range Rover's.

80/20 he'll be in purple next year.

 
Just now, EnterTheDragon said:

The Demons not even mentioned by Cameron despite Mahobey’s previous very public declaration of our interest. 

Clear shift away from Melbourne. Suns open to all viable offers now that the Hogan trade looks dead and buried.

....okaaay if thats how you interpret it

No club was mentioned. But the only thing Cameron has actually told anyone is that they are prepared to trade him to whoever gives them the best offer. Melbourne are still best placed *IF* the Neale & Hogan trades actually eventuate.

1 minute ago, EnterTheDragon said:

The Demons not even mentioned by Cameron despite Mahobey’s previous very public declaration of our interest. 

Clear shift away from Melbourne. Suns open to all viable offers now that the Hogan trade looks dead and buried.

I find you highly amusing.

How them tea leaves going?


Admittedly its just possibly my read on the situation but I cant help but think a lot of folk are misconstruing the nature of pick 5 and May.

Mahoney has been quite candid in saying we need the hogan trade in order to get May..There after everyone , bar a few simply assume pick 5 is THE price for May.

Its not how I read it at all. The Hogan trade delivers a goodly 1st pick ( and maybe change )..So for sake of argument lets call that pick 5. Yes pick % is INSTRUMENTAL in securing May as GC want that pick...but its not the price paid as such as I believe we will get more than May for 5 and there is probably still some trade off of picks as well.

Pick 5 is part of the deal...not ALL of it...imho

5 minutes ago, ProDee said:

My "gut feel" is very different to Range Rover's.

80/20 he'll be in purple next year.

The winner receives a trophy of a golden microscope hovering over golden tea leaves.

Deal?

9 minutes ago, EnterTheDragon said:

The Demons not even mentioned by Cameron despite Mahoney’s previous very public declaration of our interest. 

Clear shift away from Melbourne. Suns open to all viable offers now that the Hogan trade looks dead and buried.

That's not how I read the situation. It seems that May wants out at all costs prior to 2019 and will go to the Dees if the Hogan/Neale trade eventuates but if that trade falls over then he will play anywhere as long as it's in Melbourne (city) and not Gold Coast.

 

So what happens if May goes to Footscray whilst we offload Hogan?

Plan C...?

This is all taking far too long and has the potential to leave us in a very precarious position, which may be exactly how Freo are pushing this. 

We the MFC should be pushing them, as it is them who have no forwards. 

If May becomes a dog, we need Hogan for next year...

13 minutes ago, FrostyBeast said:

Let's just get Dunny back for the Gorilla's

 

?

We’d need pick 1 for him. Absolute beast defender. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay


1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what happens if May goes to Footscray whilst we offload Hogan?

Plan C...?

This is all taking far too long and has the potential to leave us in a very precarious position, which may be exactly how Freo are pushing this. 

We the MFC should be pushing them, as it is them who have no forwards. 

If May becomes a dog, we need Hogan for next year...

I’d be hoping Rankine slides to 5. 

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what happens if May goes to Footscray whilst we offload Hogan?

Plan C...?

This is all taking far too long and has the potential to leave us in a very precarious position, which may be exactly how Freo are pushing this. 

We the MFC should be pushing them, as it is them who have no forwards. 

If May becomes a dog, we need Hogan for next year...

GC won't do that, not until the moment it's clear we won't be trading Hogan.  They would look silly if they traded him for Pick 7 and a few hours later we had Pick 5.   Plus May will want to wait as it's still clear we are his first preference.

But, I see what you mean.  If he is legit happy to play anywhere if he has to, then it puts a little extra pressure on us to get the deal done.  I don't see it as a major issue though.

16 minutes ago, EnterTheDragon said:

The Demons not even mentioned by Cameron despite Mahobey’s previous very public declaration of our interest. 

Clear shift away from Melbourne. Suns open to all viable offers now that the Hogan trade looks dead and buried.

RR we have crossed swords before.

The Hogan trade will go ahead.

 

 

me 2

RR 0

5 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

We’d need pick 1 for Dunny. 

Or number twos.

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

That's not how I read the situation. It seems that May wants out at all costs prior to 2019 and will go to the Dees if the Hogan/Neale trade eventuates but if that trade falls over then he will play anywhere as long as it's in Melbourne (city) and not Gold Coast.

I read that he is quite aware that the Hogan/Freo link has most likely fallen through (at least for this trade period). 

Demons not a focus now for the Suns re May.


Craig Cameron is a straight shooter and a very smart operator - no doubt he and Mahoney have a range of in principle deals ready to execute as soon as Freo get their shiit together.

2 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

GC won't do that, not until the moment it's clear we won't be trading Hogan.  They would look silly if they traded him for Pick 7 and a few hours later we had Pick 5.   Plus May will want to wait as it's still clear we are his first preference.

But, I see what you mean.  If he is legit happy to play anywhere if he has to, then it puts a little extra pressure on us to get the deal done.  I don't see it as a major issue though.

Pick 7 and extra picks could get it done, if we are still deadlocked. 

I just do not like all eggs in one basket. Rule 1 in how not to do trading business. 

5 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I’d be hoping Rankine slides to 5. 

In which case he wouldn't be top rankin

Just now, Fifty-5 said:

Craig Cameron is a straight shooter and a very smart operator - no doubt he and Mahoney have a range of in principle deals ready to execute as soon as Freo get their shiit together.

The big problem here is that we are all dependant on mother [censored] Freo, the most useless football club in Australia. 

We've been waiting for a week for them to get things sorted, and here we are, a day out, and they haven't even traded Neale who wants to leave them, for which they already have a good deal on the table from Brisbane.

 


8 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Admittedly its just possibly my read on the situation but I cant help but think a lot of folk are misconstruing the nature of pick 5 and May.

Mahoney has been quite candid in saying we need the hogan trade in order to get May..There after everyone , bar a few simply assume pick 5 is THE price for May.

Its not how I read it at all. The Hogan trade delivers a goodly 1st pick ( and maybe change )..So for sake of argument lets call that pick 5. Yes pick % is INSTRUMENTAL in securing May as GC want that pick...but its not the price paid as such as I believe we will get more than May for 5 and there is probably still some trade off of picks as well.

Pick 5 is part of the deal...not ALL of it...imho

Think you may find, the GC have ample picks this year at the top of the order and are looking to try and bank picks for next year when they will have the start of a number of elite academy players start to come through. While they May still want Pick 5 for May (lots of May's), they will then look to either turn this into picks next year or look for a group of Future picks instead of taking pick 5 into next years draft to lift the points they have available for academy players. How they do that remains to be seen, but one thing I can guarantee is they want picks next year! Apparently their Academy squad at junior levels is pretty darn good, coming from far more informed sources than I on the subject of scouting and recruiting.

3 minutes ago, Jaded said:

The big problem here is that we are all dependant on mother [censored] Freo, the most useless football club in Australia. 

We've been waiting for a week for them to get things sorted, and here we are, a day out, and they haven't even traded Neale who wants to leave them, for which they already have a good deal on the table from Brisbane.

 

There is a strong argument for slamming the door shut on Freo Last Friday night and renegotiating new tearms with GC. If we get blind sided and Freo get their key forward i will be in a foul mood

44 minutes ago, Leoncelli_36 said:

The fact May has just said he is happy to go to 'Any Victorian Club' means we are in competition for his services and will need to give up pick 5, should we receive it. 

You're acting as though we have other options and are not exploring them.

We can only deal with what we've got.  We don't have a first rounder, and if that's what GC want for May, we're doing what we can to get one in to do the deal.  We don't have a huge amount of bargaining power, and it's not as though we can just pull a pick out of our [censored] to make a deal happen.

 

Any chance the Dees will get pick 5, and then instead of giving it to the Suns, trade it up to a higher pick? Say, 1, 2, 3 or 4, similar to what we did with (I think) Oliver and Weid?

11 minutes ago, Jaded said:

The big problem here is that we are all dependant on mother [censored] Freo, the most useless football club in Australia. 

We've been waiting for a week for them to get things sorted, and here we are, a day out, and they haven't even traded Neale who wants to leave them, for which they already have a good deal on the table from Brisbane.

 

The real question is why are you still waiting for them when they so clearly and adamantly pulled out of negotiations for Hogan last week?

Why are so many on here living in Dee-nial about this.

Some clubs are being affected by the Neale deal hold up, yes. The Demons aren’t one of them.

Edited by EnterTheDragon


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 189 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies