Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Why are we $1.55 favorites to beat the hottest team in the league in GWS? 

they are ravaged by injury and may have 3rd spot stitched up by then.

 

There are four possibilities: W-W, W-L, L-W and L-L.

I can see an argument for all four:

  1. Backs to the wall, pressure on us all week, we galvanise in a road trip (we've been doing that all year) and beat a WC side that actually isn't in great form. With finals locked in, the mental pressure is released and the shackles fall off, seeing us romp home against GWS
  2. See above re: West Coast, but we get ahead of ourselves knowing we've made finals and flop
  3. We get done by West Coast this week. However, by the time we get to our Round 23 game Port has lost to Collingwood and Essendon and North lost to Adelaide, which means we're locked in to the top 8 whether or not we beat GWS. The pressure therefore falls away and we romp home against GWS.
  4. We get done by West Coast, Port wins a game and/or North beats Adelaide, meaning we know that we have to beat GWS to qualify. We lose, obviously.
6 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Assuming we have a close loss and a close win, Geelong would need to win both of their games by a combined 200 points to catch us on percentage.

Given they play Freo who have half of their side including Fyfe and Gold Coast, it's quite achievable.

The probability of Geelong winning consecutive games by 100 points, us not gaining percentage despite a win (we don't win close games, we lose closes games or we win by a bunch), and Port beating Collingwood and Essendon is very low, IMO. I don't see that scenario occurring.

I think the scenario of us making it on 12 wins is more likely than the scenario of us missing on 13 wins.

2 hours ago, praha said:

they are ravaged by injury and may have 3rd spot stitched up by then.

I reckon they'll be itching to test themselves on the MCG, where they haven't played since Round 2, before the finals start.

15 hours ago, praha said:

they are ravaged by injury and may have 3rd spot stitched up by then.

There could be a scenario in play whereby if Hawthorn lose to Sydney in round 23, the top 4 of the ladder could look like this just prior to the Melb V GWS game.

Richmond    18-4

WCE             16-6

Collingwood  15-7

GWS               14-6-1 

Seeing that GWS would already have top 4 stitched up and can't get into top 2, that might take a bit of fizz off their desire to win the game. They may even prefer to come down to Melbourne in week 1 of finals than travel all the way to WA?? They may even rest a couple of players or not rush back Toby Greene??

Clutching at straws I know, but every 1 per center helps.

 

    

 

Richmond have now lost Lambert. I dont think it's long term though but he's an important player.

Everyone is dropping like flies around us, we wont get a greater opportunity than now. Time to stand up and stop the spin.

42 minutes ago, MSFebey said:

Richmond have now lost Lambert. I dont think it's long term though but he's an important player.

Everyone is dropping like flies around us, we wont get a greater opportunity than now. Time to stand up and stop the spin.

Richmond are so lucky they even time their key injuries to perfection.

They finally get an injury one of their stars, but it turns out he'll only miss a couple of dead rubbers and the bye week.


21 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

that's paying $22 at Sportsbet (including the MFC losses)

$5.63 without the MFC games

Im on!!!

 
48 minutes ago, worldwideweb_demon said:

Since finals are out of the question, I say we just try to tank and get draft picks.

they go to Adelaide for lever anyway...

  • Author
1 hour ago, MSFebey said:

If we lose next 2 and favourites win:

image.png.1cb2f947afa56d1291d4f121097117b4.png

Win one of them and get a home final in week 1 and we can dare to dream.

If we lose both....            I don't even want to think about that.


1 minute ago, Petraccattack said:

Win one of them and get a home final in week 1 and we can dare to dream.

If we lose both....            I don't even want to think about that.

Agree trac, unfortunately we've put ourselves in this situation again, you can just feel it'll come down to R23 again and we'll be a laughing stock again. However, I reckon we'll knock off the Eagles.

We've definitely improved on last year even if/when we miss finals because this year we have 3 games to fail in wheras last year it was only the last game against Collingwood.

31 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Win one of them and get a home final in week 1 and we can dare to dream.

If we lose both....            I don't even want to think about that.

What? At the MCG? No thanks..

  • Author
Just now, jnrmac said:

What? At the MCG? No thanks..

 

LOL good point.

We would be a better chance in an away final.

1 hour ago, Rusty Nails said:

Just go with T-Mac and a medium/small forward line.

As unfortunate as Hulk's injury is, sometimes things happen for a reason.

The impending return of Melksham and and an available Kent kicking a few goals on the weekend might be just the tonic we need to get over the Eagles & the Greater Western Circus and secure a finals berth.

CONS


9 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

There could be a scenario in play whereby if Hawthorn lose to Sydney in round 23, the top 4 of the ladder could look like this just prior to the Melb V GWS game.

Richmond    18-4

WCE             16-6

Collingwood  15-7

GWS               14-6-1 

Seeing that GWS would already have top 4 stitched up and can't get into top 2, that might take a bit of fizz off their desire to win the game. They may even prefer to come down to Melbourne in week 1 of finals than travel all the way to WA?? They may even rest a couple of players or not rush back Toby Greene??

Clutching at straws I know, but every 1 per center helps.

  

It's a fascinating conundrum for them. If we beat WCE, then a win over GWS would put us in 5th. 4th if Collingwood and Hawthorn lose 1 of their matches. Port or Freo, Stk or Sydney. If super lucky, then GWS may even be locked in 3rd pre-game.

 

There is hope afterall. This week is a massive game and it's quite funny now that we're away from the G, that there is a faint hope. I feel like a junkie wanting one more hit..

4si4bt.jpg

 

 

Edited by johndemonic

On 8/13/2018 at 7:28 AM, beelzebub said:

We haven't beaten anyone of significance really all season.

Might I ask then why do some now suppose we'll beat either or both teams currently 2nd and 3rd ? 

I'm not being defeatist to simply abide by realistic appraisal. 

Finals now looming as a bridge too far. I saw very little from my seat yesterday to counter this view.

Dream on

I hear you B.B. and totally agree, but the wheel has to turn in our favour at some point. I’m not confident but hopefull, so until it’s confirmed, for me we’re still alive.

F%#k it... All those crying poor us with the Hogan news on top of Lever & Viney well Collingwood & GWS have managed a top 4 spot with a worse injury list then us. Port lost Dixon for the season on the weekend... Lets just get on with it, I'm pretty confident we can knock off west coast this week regardless, we get Hibberd & Melksham back. 

Everyone's expecting us to fall in a hole these next 2 weeks so what have we got to lose, everyones going here Melbourne goes again.... We'll either prove them wrong or right, we either make finals or we don't. One things for certain we'll all be back again next year regardless so let's just bring on the next 2 weeks, enjoy it. What will be will be.

2 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

I hear you B.B. and totally agree, but the wheel has to turn in our favour at some point. I’m not confident but hopefull, so until it’s confirmed, for me we’re still alive.

Does it... wheel have to turn ? 

No rule says it has to :(

3 hours ago, MSFebey said:

If we lose next 2 and favourites win:

image.png.1cb2f947afa56d1291d4f121097117b4.png

No way does Port win either of their next 2, Pies and Bombers. Champion data also forecasts this.

Melb , even losing next 2, end up 8th on %.

And this will be clear on the Friday night of Rd 23 when Bombers play Port. So if Port DOES win, then at least its still up to club to beat GWS. 


19 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

No way does Port win either of their next 2, Pies and Bombers. Champion data also forecasts this.

Melb , even losing next 2, end up 8th on %.

And this will be clear on the Friday night of Rd 23 when Bombers play Port. So if Port DOES win, then at least its still up to club to beat GWS. 

There's a part of me that would prefer it be down to us having to win one of these two games. As much as I want us to play finals I'm not sure I want us in there limping in with no wins against anyone of note.

That said I really desperately want us in the finals.

21 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

No way does Port win either of their next 2, Pies and Bombers. Champion data also forecasts this.

Melb , even losing next 2, end up 8th on %.

And this will be clear on the Friday night of Rd 23 when Bombers play Port. So if Port DOES win, then at least its still up to club to beat GWS. 

Desperate or not, there is no way in hell I'm cheering for the Pies. We either beat Eagles or I rather not make up the 8.

If Melbourne can't win, the only small satisfaction is seeing Collingwood lose.

31 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

No way does Port win either of their next 2, Pies and Bombers. Champion data also forecasts this.

Melb , even losing next 2, end up 8th on %.

And this will be clear on the Friday night of Rd 23 when Bombers play Port. So if Port DOES win, then at least its still up to club to beat GWS. 

If North (vs Adel/StK), Geel (vs Feo/GCS) or Ess (vs Rich/PA) win both games they will have 13 wins.  If we lose both we drop out of the 8 and stranded on 12 wins.  Same for Port.  In fact both Demons and Port could drop out of the 8 and replaced (most likely) by the Scott bros.  If Port win one and Geel/North win two we are out.

So, on my reckoning we must win a game to ensure we make it.  Hopefully, this week otherwise it will be a truly nail biting rnd 23, again.

It would cut me to the core to drop out of the 8 to make way for a sooky Scott coached team (or heaven forbid TWSNBN). 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 

I have us losing next two and scraping in as long as Adelaide beat North, Bombers beat Port, and rest of results go as I (?) would expect.

 

Screenshot_20180814-210134_Chrome.jpg


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 170 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 46 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies