DeleteUser 638 Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 2 hours ago, Garbo said: Sure we could get De Goey, just don’t cry that we have to give up Petracca and Brayshaw to do it Vox Pop: Who would you give up for Dee Goey? Petracca + a pick or someone else? Quote
Adzman 2,154 Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 Would rather the filth overpay home and then watch him fizzle Quote
Willmoy1947 4,261 Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 Pie in the sky...................... Quote
ding 5,126 Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 9 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said: Did you just quote yourself and ask yourself a question? He must have meant to log in with another one of his other accounts. lol... Multi-fail. 1 Quote
Cheap Seats 3,310 Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 Haha fek that was funny What a [censored] Quote
Roost It 1,434 Posted June 13, 2018 Posted June 13, 2018 8 hours ago, DV8 said: As I said I like Gaff... but with our dwindling resources in the salary cap, this deecision is Crucial, to get it right. We are very one geared. We are very much a power geared side,,, and i want us to add an extra dimension to our run and carry. Pace, breaks big games open. Hunt was our pace but instead of teaching him to lower his eyes we dropped him and now his season is over right when we need him 1 Quote
DV8 2,271 Posted June 13, 2018 Author Posted June 13, 2018 35 minutes ago, Roost It said: Hunt was our pace but instead of teaching him to lower his eyes we dropped him and now his season is over right when we need him Why do you say, 'instead of teaching him'? Don't you reckon we've been trying to get him to use the ball better since last season ? The coaches of course, would have been working on that with him. And so we have worked hard on getting ur half back sorted so we use the ball better coming out of defence. We have been much better at this, in 2018. But sadly Hunt has not been able to capture his best form, from the wing. Our depth has miraculously improved from defence, since we recruited Lever, and others last year. Quote
Roost It 1,434 Posted June 14, 2018 Posted June 14, 2018 13 hours ago, DV8 said: Why do you say, 'instead of teaching him'? Don't you reckon we've been trying to get him to use the ball better since last season ? The coaches of course, would have been working on that with him. And so we have worked hard on getting ur half back sorted so we use the ball better coming out of defence. We have been much better at this, in 2018. But sadly Hunt has not been able to capture his best form, from the wing. Our depth has miraculously improved from defence, since we recruited Lever, and others last year. In a team lacking a bit of dash Id play Hunt and Garlett. Too good for the seconds in my opinion 1 Quote
DV8 2,271 Posted June 14, 2018 Author Posted June 14, 2018 44 minutes ago, Roost It said: In a team lacking a bit of dash Id play Hunt and Garlett. Too good for the seconds in my opinion I disagree on Garlett this year. Hasn't deserved it. You have to earn it,,, by doing the things 'the coaches' and 'the team' want/need. Not watt 'you', want to do only. Watt was quick as well, like a fox, unfortunately. But not so much a 'team' man. just one of the' buoys'. floated around waiting. 'watt of the wisp'. We want pace, with 'attitude',,, or 'brute', see Danger. 'will of the wisp', not so much. I guess that's why we got Spargo, and Baker, both have 'tude'. But both not what i'm talking about. 'De Goey will be hotter property, and I am thinking he's skills are a better investment, than Gaff's gut run. . Quote
praha 11,267 Posted June 14, 2018 Posted June 14, 2018 Petracca vs De Goey https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_player_compare?playerStatus1=A&tid1=12&pid1=4041&fid1=S&playerStatus2=A&tid2=5&pid2=4043&fid2=S&type=A Tracking similarly. Given out scoring options it is reasonanble to suggest we rely less on Trac kicking goals, and so therefore he is given fewer opportunities to score than De Goey. Trac wins in CP, rebound 50s, intercepts and metres gained. De Goey in goals, i50s, and score involvements. This tells us Trac is playing more of a defensive role, De Goey more an attacking role. Is the effectiveness of a midfielder-swingman determined exclusively on their scoreboard impact? I think Trac is have a very solid year. As is De Goey. Quote
DV8 2,271 Posted June 14, 2018 Author Posted June 14, 2018 On 6/13/2018 at 3:10 PM, timbo said: Vox Pop: Who would you give up for Dee Goey? Petracca + a pick or someone else? Brayshaw for top 10 pick. ... pick ontraded for De Goey ? Quote
Ethan Tremblay 31,388 Posted June 14, 2018 Posted June 14, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, DV8 said: Brayshaw for top 10 pick. ... pick ontraded for De Goey ? Go away. Edited June 14, 2018 by Ethan Tremblay 5 1 Quote
Watts the matter 1,235 Posted June 14, 2018 Posted June 14, 2018 57 minutes ago, DV8 said: Brayshaw for top 10 pick. ... pick ontraded for De Goey ? Dreaming that you could essentially trade Brayshaw for De Goey. Quote
Deemania since 56 6,808 Posted June 15, 2018 Posted June 15, 2018 On 5/21/2018 at 8:52 PM, Lord Travis said: Pick 5 behind Petracca and Brayshaw in 2014, has just hit 50 games. We have no first round pick this year and cannot trade next years, so unless we're wiling to trade one of our own young guns (Trac, Oliver, Hogan, Brayshaw) then we cannot get him or Wines or anyone. On the basis, can't see it happening and prefer our youngsters to him. Youngsters with talent grow up and then hell breaks loose on the field. We have a great list. Culture and hunger are missing but these are bubbling now more than the recent (20 years) past. Quote
DV8 2,271 Posted June 15, 2018 Author Posted June 15, 2018 11 hours ago, Watts the matter said: Dreaming that you could essentially trade Brayshaw for De Goey. I don't know the difference in market values,,, only the clubs would. But I do know that a top 10 pick would go a long way towards that end, as trade in part for De Goey. Now I know we all like Gus, but unfortunately he is a long term risk. We are not the complete list, that people have been talking about in recent seasons. And I know one pacy player is not the answer, just as Diamond Jim was not the answer on his lonesome,,, back in the 60's. We need to include about 3 quickish players into our lineup, IMO. Stretch might be one? Hunt at present, isn't. DShiel would go some way to help. Degoey would be fantastic. Gaff wouldn't, IMO. Buying in, would mean, we have to make some tough (ruthless) decisions with our list. We have to enter trade;,,, and yes trade some favourite players. Quote
junk 342 Posted June 15, 2018 Posted June 15, 2018 Someone from the Saints admin thought they should have picked Petracca instead of Mc C, the Dees showed interest in De Goey which would have been a win win for both clubs. Quote
Watts the matter 1,235 Posted June 15, 2018 Posted June 15, 2018 1 hour ago, ENYAW said: Someone from the Saints admin thought they should have picked Petracca instead of Mc C, the Dees showed interest in De Goey which would have been a win win for both clubs. According to who? I don't believe it. Quote
Big Demon 197 Posted June 27, 2018 Posted June 27, 2018 The Kangas have put up a mil a year over 5 years so would have to be a chance to get him now. Quote
jackaub 1,402 Posted June 27, 2018 Posted June 27, 2018 So who are the Kangas going to trade to make this happen Will not be easy. Hope CW match the payment and sends them broke Just don't see how Degoey moves without the Kangas losing picks and players Quote
chook fowler 19,772 Posted June 27, 2018 Posted June 27, 2018 He won’t go anywhere. Eddie will put a horses head in his sisters bed. Quote
dl4e 5,851 Posted June 27, 2018 Posted June 27, 2018 44 minutes ago, chook fowler said: He won’t go anywhere. Eddie will put a horses head in his sisters bed. Or maybe a fanticised version of Tom Lynch. Eddie would be creaming himself. Quote
Moonshadow 17,678 Posted June 28, 2018 Posted June 28, 2018 On 6/15/2018 at 12:12 AM, Ethan Tremblay said: Go away. Ignore function is a sanity saver when it comes to Deeluded's posts. Except of course, when others quote him 1 Quote
Redleg 42,156 Posted June 28, 2018 Posted June 28, 2018 (edited) Pies will not lose De Goey IMO. Pies will lose players to keep him and he will forego some cash, but IMO will not leave. He will sign a 2 year deal at less cash, say $800k per year, or a longer term one, if he is happy to forego the future offers that may come. Pies will try and pension Wells off and other players can be moved on as well. Hearing rumours about Moore going as well, but I think he will only go if they get another key forward. Hello Tom, even though the Tigers appear to be the leaders in his chase. Edited June 28, 2018 by Redleg Quote
Big Demon 197 Posted June 28, 2018 Posted June 28, 2018 12 hours ago, Redleg said: Pies will not lose De Goey IMO. Pies will lose players to keep him and he will forego some cash, but IMO will not leave. He will sign a 2 year deal at less cash, say $800k per year, or a longer term one, if he is happy to forego the future offers that may come. Pies will try and pension Wells off and other players can be moved on as well. Hearing rumours about Moore going as well, but I think he will only go if they get another key forward. Hello Tom, even though the Tigers appear to be the leaders in his chase. In the normal run of events I would agree but the Tom Lynch factor comes into this. From all reports their cap is running tight, Pendlebury and Sidebottom would be eating up a bit and they had to shell out the dollars to lure Adams and Treloar to the club. Can they find all that money even at 800k for De Goey and still find the cash for Lynch whom they have been openly chasing? Quote
picket fence 18,184 Posted June 28, 2018 Posted June 28, 2018 On 5/22/2018 at 9:03 PM, WERRIDEE said: De Goey is off to North. We have Gaff in the bag? Truer words have never been as emphatically keyboarded! 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.