Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
40 minutes ago, Demonland said:

7AADD2D9-FCFE-49A8-B839-EC03A51FA67E.jpeg

New jumpers look great, not so sure about the colour of the boots.

...though to paraphrase @old dee, so long as they are kicking goals and pin point passes to their team mates with them, I don't care what colour their boots are!

 
1 hour ago, Salems Lot said:

Looks like the one Jack is wearing is a size or 2 too big.

Some posters.. “Christ we can’t even get the right size for Crusher Viney in the  announcement pics?!”

(The way to big jumper actually does look a bit poos).

Awesome. Common sense prevails! 

Looks great. Love it. No more white ever again.

No more angry batman demon top. No more Bali knockoff! Great work.

 
13 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

I'm not totally keen on a royal blue clash, I'd prefer a predominately red one but it's better than white.

Agree prefer the red

Hoped the royal blue was dead and buried 

But the white is worse

Edited by Old Bear


On 18/11/2017 at 10:49 AM, Mazer Rackham said:

Round 3, 2017

500389.jpg


Round 20, 2017

537696.jpg

 

Simply Amazing, AFL the most hypocritical sporting entity in the world bar none including FIFA. Rules for a certain few and rules for others. JOKE.

Prefer this to the white for sure. Are we keeping the home strip with red on the back or not?

11 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

Prefer this to the white for sure. Are we keeping the home strip with red on the back or not?

We are keeping the red back for away games vs Bulldogs and West Coast.

 

We’ll make a GF and be forced to wear the clash. Jones to hold the cup aloft wearing the #2 coming full circle from Robbie Flower and the dark years, thereby ending the Norm Smith curse.

Not a huge fan of the Royal Blue. Memories of the late ‘70’s and early 80’s watching the Demons had few highlights, But it is 100 x better than a white Jumper, at least now i know, at first glance I am watching the Demons

well done to those who kept up the views to the AFL. 

Clash Jumpers are purely a marketing tool


The first Demon jumper I got was red and royal blue. That being said I got on board in 1988 so have only seen us in navy blue.

I know CS would be spewing. All his work trying to make us look exactly like we did in 1949 has been comprehensively trashed. I know of his disdain for the royal blue jumper.

I personally like it. Some reckon that we should never revisit the royal blue era but I reckon we should own it. For too long, we have just been willing to recognize the parts of our history that cast us in a good light. All so we can remind ourselves what a 'great club' we are; one up with the likes of Collingwood , Carlton and Essendon (clubs who are also living in denial).

I reckon of we win a flag in the royal blue it will be a sensational reminder of all the blood, guts and tears that went into it.

Edited by Colin B. Flaubert
Misspelled word

10 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Most exciting news all day.  Stuff about the new sponsor is great and important, but really doesn't do much to excite the passion in me as a supporter.  Well done to the club for listening to it's membership/supporter base and making this happen and also for the AFL for finally comming to their senses as well.

Right from the start of this ridiculous clash/away jumper policy the AFL brought in 10 - 15 years ago, it felt like a foreign (Americanised) sporting culture was being imposed on our code with the (selectively applied) predominantly white emphasis.  I'm pragmatic enough to realize the need for a clash jumper of some description, but really the AFL should have thought long and hard before it let clubs like WC, Port and Freo adopt new jumper designs that clashed more heavily with existing teams jumpers than the jumpers approved for those teams when theyou first joined the comp, so much of this was the making of the AFL.

The new 'Royal Blue' clash looks great compared to the white/Bali jumpers.  It actually looks a few shades lighter than the original royal blue ones, though my royal blue one with the number 2 got pretty sun faded in the end.

It's hard to imagine any number other than #2 being affixed to an original royal blue era jumper. If anyone out there had a different number it would be interesting to know which one and why.

As to the new clash jumper, why has it taken a decade or so to work out that a royal blue jumper could actually work as a clash jumper? It looks good, doesn't antagonise the fans and adds a nostalgic element.

I would've preferred we reverted back to our original clash jumper of 2004-2005 as per below. We would still keep our traditional colours and not divert to white (which everyone seems to hate).

Image result for carlton v melbourne 2005

 

Image result for carlton v melbourne 2005


6 hours ago, Swooper said:

We’ll make a GF and be forced to wear the clash. Jones to hold the cup aloft wearing the #2 coming full circle from Robbie Flower and the dark years, thereby ending the Norm Smith curse.

Take it in a heart beat, we should embrace it my fellow Dees.

  • Author
5 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

It's hard to imagine any number other than #2 being affixed to an original royal blue era jumper. If anyone out there had a different number it would be interesting to know which one and why.

As to the new clash jumper, why has it taken a decade or so to work out that a royal blue jumper could actually work as a clash jumper? It looks good, doesn't antagonise the fans and adds a nostalgic element.

In all honesty, my era of becoming a serious MFC supporter immediately followed royal blue jumper era in 86/87 and I think the number 2 jumper I has was a bit of pre loved hand-me-down or op-shop special so it's hard for me to comment with authority, but my old man reckons that for the preceeding period of doom and gloom, wacko Jackson gave him the only reason to turn up to games, so perhaps there were a few with 25 on them.  Before that big Carl Detterich had been a bit of a favorite in 10.

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

1 minute ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

In all honesty, my era of becoming a serious MFC supporter immediately followed royal blue jumper era in 86/87 and I think the number 2 jumper I has was a bit of pre loved hand-me-down or op-shop special so it's haRd for me to comment with authority, but my old man reckons that for the preceeding period of doom and gloom, wacko Jackson gave him the only reason to turn upto games, so perhaps there were a few with 25 on them.  Before that big Carl Detterich had been a bit of a favorite in 10.

From the sublime to the ridiculous. One of the great things about AFL is that all sorts can play at the top level. Tall or short; fast or slow (though, not too slow); academically gifted or not; silver spoon upbringing or from the school of hard knocks; and serene or as mad as a cut snake. All of us who watched Flower and Mark Jackson know who was serene and who was the cut snake. 

8 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I would've preferred we reverted back to our original clash jumper of 2004-2005 as per below. We would still keep our traditional colours and not divert to white (which everyone seems to hate).

Image result for carlton v melbourne 2005

 

Image result for carlton v melbourne 2005

Boy we were ordinary in the old Royal Blue days and I still have a phobia about the colour .

The above clash jumper with the revived 19th century MFC monogram on the front would be great but then an alternative against the Bummers may be necessary .


It's been a while since I purchased a new Demons guernsey, but I have a feeling that's about to change very quickly with this one.  I reckon it's an absolute ripper.

I think it looks great. I’m glad the club could get over the fact we had some poor years in the royal blue. Let’s hope those supporters who keep digging up the past can as well. Embrace the royal.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

The new clash jumper is NOT Royal Blue.

Our regular jumper is Navy with Red

Robbie's regular WAS Royal Blue

This incarnation is well...just blue...a sort of capri blue

Its better than white and once and for all puts to bed the lie that is the AFL's bullshlt.

 

interesting that our current home guernsey AND our main away guernsey are BOTH historically HOME guernseys. 

a pretty good result when all said and done

4 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

interesting that our current home guernsey AND our main away guernsey are BOTH historically HOME guernseys. 

a pretty good result when all said and done

funny...such a concept would never have occurred to any of us eh :rolleyes:


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies