Jump to content

Featured Replies

the only concern i have with going after lever is that we will be paying him big $'s, then in the next few years we will have others throwing big $'s at Hogan and Trac, Hunt, etc. which means we have to offer them big $'s to keep them.

 
1 hour ago, Demon77 said:
Jake Lever on playing footy deep into September #AFLGFParade
 
ZbMAZu95ETWtMILk.jpg:small
Can anybody read eyes? Looking up and left is lying , yeah?

Book him in Danno !! ;)

3 minutes ago, Deecisive said:

the only concern i have with going after lever is that we will be paying him big $'s, then in the next few years we will have others throwing big $'s at Hogan and Trac, Hunt, etc. which means we have to offer them big $'s to keep them.

Don't think it will be an issue if we are contending.

The CBA is going up and guys like Lewis, Jones & Vince will be finishing up or retired.

They will be replaced by younger players on a lower wage.

 

I'm not sure why people are so concerned with what we might potentially pay Jake. Todd Viney  and his list management team plan for every conceivable senario years out from it eventuating.This will not be a panicked, spur of the moment decision. 

ROO basically admitted the crows have given up on keeping jake


20 hours ago, Demon77 said:
Jake Lever on playing footy deep into September #AFLGFParade
 
ZbMAZu95ETWtMILk.jpg:small
Can anybody read eyes? Looking up and left is lying , yeah?

Three opportunities to give a straight answer and he didn’t. He’s GAWN and hopefully headed our way.

20 hours ago, Is Dom Is Good said:

Don't think it will be an issue if we are contending.

The CBA is going up and guys like Lewis, Jones & Vince will be finishing up or retired.

They will be replaced by younger players on a lower wage.

Agree.

A 20% CBA increase in the cap means $800k is the same as $650k in the past.

And $650k in a few years will be the equivalent of $500K.

You also have to pay market rates to get someone decent. 

Not too much to pay given all defenders can pressure but few can make goid decisions and he will likely be with mfc player the rest of his career

 

Wasn’t disgraced today out on the big stage. Played ok considering how easy the tigers got the ball in.

4 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Wasn’t disgraced today out on the big stage. Played ok considering how easy the tigers got the ball in.

Was very average, was OK in the first quarter and racked up some junk time stats late in the game. Gave away a shocking free kick that costed a goal when Adelaide were doing well early.

Showed his lack of speed today and again didn't match up on a quality opponent.You would want a player of his size who is not going to play KP,  to take the likes of Martin or Dangerfield.

Still don't see him being worth the kind of money that is being talked about, whether that is 750 or 900.


Watching the game today through a haze of cheroot smoke and the taste of an Asahi or three it seems obvious we need pace pressure and power and this boy was a rabbit in the headlights so pick 27 and nothing else but also plain to see wattsy is yesterday's hero so pick 29 form port would be okay and keep 10 for speed......

The sad thing is we will pay top dollar, then the Crows will easily find a replacement for him and not miss a beat.

I wouldn't be against keeping pick 10 and forgetting Lever...   groom Joel SMith for that role.

26 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

The sad thing is we will pay top dollar, then the Crows will easily find a replacement for him and not miss a beat.

I wouldn't be against keeping pick 10 and forgetting Lever...   groom Joel SMith for that role.

Lever plays a role that we desperately lack in term of his intercept marking. It's why we're paying overs to get him. He's a huge missing link 

On 29/09/2017 at 5:55 PM, Demon77 said:
Jake Lever on playing footy deep into September #AFLGFParade
 
ZbMAZu95ETWtMILk.jpg:small
Can anybody read eyes? Looking up and left is lying , yeah?

Yeah that's true, no doubt!  And if you scratch your left [censored] whilst looking over your right shoulder, that's also indicative of a liar. Or perhaps you just have crabs. 


1 hour ago, Petraccattack said:

The sad thing is we will pay top dollar, then the Crows will easily find a replacement for him and not miss a beat.

I wouldn't be against keeping pick 10 and forgetting Lever...   groom Joel SMith for that role.

Fully agree. Overated, nowhere near a first round pick. Develop what we have already and go hard at quality runners who can kick a football

1 hour ago, grey wolf said:

Watching the game today through a haze of cheroot smoke and the taste of an Asahi or three it seems obvious we need pace pressure and power and this boy was a rabbit in the headlights so pick 27 and nothing else but also plain to see wattsy is yesterday's hero so pick 29 form port would be okay and keep 10 for speed......

hahaha

Hmmmm, value dropped a tad today, looked to big and slow for the smalls. Will not be tall enough or strong enough to play on the bigger talls.

Lucky for him most teams have 3rd tall forwards and he can play the intercept role.

 

The kid is good, great below his knees, doesn't fumble, good evading skills and can read the play. 

Regardless if we are giving overs, does this kid walk into our best 22? 

Most of us believe we should chase players to make us better, he will.

I think Jake was quite good today, best of the crows and helped to keep the scoreline from getting real ugly.


2 minutes ago, Demon77 said:

The kid is good, great below his knees, doesn't fumble, good evading skills and can read the play. 

Regardless if we are giving overs, does this kid walk into our best 22? 

Most of us believe we should chase players to make us better, he will.

Yeah he does. But. We should inquire as to the availability of Nick Hayne (GWS). I would rate him as good a prospect as Lever. So we have more than one card to play here. Whether the club play it or not. But I would. As to Lever, he did ok today - below his best (but ok). Rance was important for Richmond, and Lever is miles ahead of Rance at this stage of his career. Lever is quality. The thing is, so is Haynes, and can we find other key position back man of quality - in order to make Adelaide believe we aren't do or die on this deal? We need to drive this price (picks wise) down.

25 minutes ago, manny100 said:

Hmmmm, value dropped a tad today, looked to big and slow for the smalls. Will not be tall enough or strong enough to play on the bigger talls.

Lucky for him most teams have 3rd tall forwards and he can play the intercept role.

 

Jake Level is 1cm taller than TMcD..... i would think that Hibberd would be getting a small to pick up first.

9 minutes ago, ThreeOneSix said:

Yeah he does. But. We should inquire as to the availability of Nick Hayne (GWS). I would rate him as good a prospect as Lever. So we have more than one card to play here. Whether the club play it or not. But I would. As to Lever, he did ok today - below his best (but ok). Rance was important for Richmond, and Lever is miles ahead of Rance at this stage of his career. Lever is quality. The thing is, so is Haynes, and can we find other key position back man of quality - in order to make Adelaide believe we aren't do or die on this deal? We need to drive this price (picks wise) down.

Think Nick may be on his way to St Kilda.

 

It's not up for debate

hes coming

deal done

move on

spoke to my man today regarding Hogan. Was told he's not part of the untradeables but only leaving for absolute top dollar. His management are adamant he's happy in Melbourne and that he'll remain a Dee for quite some time. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 147 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 270 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Geelong

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 36 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Geelong

    Captain Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year in his quest to take out his 3rd trophy. He leads Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver who are in equal 2nd place followed by Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. You votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 28 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Geelong

    The Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, falling to 0–4 after a more spirited showing against the Cats at Kardinia Park. Despite the improved effort, they went down by 39 points, and the road ahead is looking increasingly grim.

      • Like
    • 313 replies
    Demonland