Jump to content

The 2017 Membership Thread

Featured Replies

The best thing about our Women's Team is that it is currently a restricted women's competition with only four Melbourne-based teams, meaning we effectively get the jump on the Hawks, Bombers, Saints, Roos and Tigers!

It is an advantage that we will only have for a short window so we must exploit this and leverage off it to the maximum in promoting MFC to a entirely new market of potential members. If we don't, the Blues, Pies and Doggies will!

With Daisy Pearce as the face of our Women's Team, we have a very good competitive advantage over the other three Melbourne-based teams as she is by far and away the most high profile and articulate ambassador for women's football in the AFL.

It is imperative that we take the initiative and get the jump on them all. Go Dees!

 

 

Not sure when our club office shuts, I'm assuming tomorrow or Wednesday.  Looks like we will be around 29K prior to Christmas, would have been nice to tick over 30K.  I reckon we will finish in 2017 around 42,433 members

1 hour ago, drdrake said:

Not sure when our club office shuts, I'm assuming tomorrow or Wednesday.  Looks like we will be around 29K prior to Christmas, would have been nice to tick over 30K.  I reckon we will finish in 2017 around 42,433 members

Then another 7,500 supporters of our AFL Women's Team will leave us seventeen tantalising members short of 50,000.

 

Just as a comparison Norf who I think had a record year last year, they're sitting on 26,895

Saints 28,170


What have the Doggies got?

I reckon they'll crack 50,000.

41 minutes ago, praha said:

What have the Doggies got?

I reckon they'll crack 50,000.

Couldn't find numbers on their website.  If we win a GF I would think our membership will go into the strastophere, well beyond 50,000!!

I do recall the Bulldogs 2017 'premium' membership sold out within 48 hours of the Grand Final.  Their 'premium' membership guarantees access to a Grand Final ticket and it now has a waiting list a mile long.

That might be a bit of foretelling for Dees fans - this may be a good time to upgrade membership to a 'premium' option ('Redlegs', 'Trident'  or 'Legends') to guarantee a GF ticket when we play in it - and play in it we will!!.  Or buy the 'guarantee' as an add-on to other membership options. https://membership.melbournefc.com.au/packages/view/741/Grand-Final-Guarantee

When we get to the GF might be too late to get that precious ticket!! 

And we will get there (and win one or a few)!! :cool:

 

Quick search of AFL linked club websites reveal:

  • Brisbane - 13539
  • Carlton - 32759
  • Essendon - 45187
  • Geelong - 40111
  • Gold Coast - 7294
  • GWS - 9729
  • Hawthorn - 60023
  • Melbourne - 28984
  • North Melbourne - 26895
  • Port Adelaide - 48875
  • Richmond - 52130
  • Saints - 29084
  • Sydney -30577
  • West Coast - 54476

Also in regards to what comes with the membership, the Western Bulldogs are clearly ahead. They give a choice of ticking what you want; either a hat, a scarf or a beanie (or nothing for me please donate it back to the club).https://membership.westernbulldogs.com.au/member-choice-0

The saints have a novel way of signing up members, offering pay $1 now and the rest later. I know clubs have month by month, but surely this is just a way to get people in (regardless if they sign up when the rest of the money is due) and then pump up the member numbers. I'm sure others sign when they see the figure rise, the old 'I'm going to miss out' mentality. 


29426 ?

1 hour ago, CBDees said:

29326 ?

Actually its       29426

On 12/16/2016 at 5:42 PM, beelzebub said:

Im a bit old...and grumpy and belligerent...F#@! being patient !!

I'd never have guessed:roos:

On 12/19/2016 at 10:56 PM, Cards13 said:

Just as a comparison Norf who I think had a record year last year, they're sitting on 26,895

However North have broken their record for this time of year, so expect them to at least get to their final tally of 2016.

I'd like to beat all of North, St Kilda and Bulldogs but it's possible we could have the least of all 4.


1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

However North have broken their record for this time of year, so expect them to at least get to their final tally of 2016.

I'd like to beat all of North, St Kilda and Bulldogs but it's possible we could have the least of all 4.

I'd like to beat Collingwood, Carlton, Essendon and Hawthorn!

29,426.

As one who can remember former rover and premiership player Ian Ridley, later in his life speaking as president and warning us that in future clubs would need 20.000 members just to survive (I think we at the time had about 8,000 members - TOTAL) to this pre-Christmas result I can only respond: Wow!

The club has performed remarkably to keep this number rising in the past couple of weeks when most of us are winding down from work and gearing up for Christmas.

Anyone disappointed in not making 30,000 before the break should console themselves with this context. It really is a tremendous result and offers great hope.

It's fantastic we've got nearly 30K.    Last pre season for some reason we only got 3000 members for the two months Jan/Feb.  If we maintain our current momentum for those two months (good interest from the girls matches could do it) then we could reach the high 40's.

I live 20km from the Cats ground, regularly travel to interstate matches (Alice, Sydney, Darwin), have a 'all Vic games' Legends membership, but refuse to go to Kardinia Park because I would have to pay.

I did go this year because my mate subscribed to the Geelong Advertiser and they threw in an 'all Vic games' membership at no extra cost which I borrowed. I suspect some club membership numbers are similarly 'dodgy'.

Something to mull over - latest club by club membership figures:  http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/where-does-your-afl-club-sit-on-the-2017-membership-ladder/news-story/1a960325e0737945ffa31631aacc72f0

To make sense of it I've put the info into a table (below).  I've also shown how far each team is to reaching last years total (Carlton and North will struggle to get there).  We are at the mid point relative to other clubs of 'Latest vs 2016'. 

I've also shown the cost of an adult Home Game, General Admission season ticket. 

I wouldn't take the figures too literally as there are lots of variations in how clubs count and types of membership.  Nonetheless, the relativity is reasonable.

While it is exciting to see our club figures rising, this shows we are rising at the average rate of other clubs.  But hey, at least it is better than falling behind!

CLUB Latest 2016 2015 Latest vs 2016 Gen Admiss Adult Cost  
HAWTHORN 61,028 75,351 72,924 81% $193  
ADELAIDE 61,000 54,307 52,920 112% $250  
WEST COAST 54,661 65,188 60,221 84% N/A  
RICHMOND 52,401 72,278 70,809 72% $199  
PORT ADELAIDE 50,027 53,743 54,057 93% $210  
ESSENDON 45,536 57,494 60,818 79% $180  
GEELONG 43,007 50,571 44,312 85% $220  
CARLTON 33,270 50,130 47,305 66% $332  
SYDNEY 31,046 56,523 48,836 55% $230  
ST KILDA 31,000 38,009 32,746 82% $240  
BULLDOGS 30,000 39,459 35,222 76% $215  
MELBOURNE 29,426 39,146 35,953 75% $215  
NORTH 27,481 45,014 41,012 61% $215  
BRISBANE 14,877 25,408 0 59% 0  
GWS 10,002 15,312 13,480 65% 0  
GOLD COAST 7,294 12,854 13,643 57% 0  
             
*Collingwood (2016: 74,819) and Fremantle (2016: 51,889) have not made their membership numbers public.
Things that might distort the numbers:      
  Adelaide has a 'Free' Membership category   
  St Kilda have a $1 membership category    
 

North and Hawthorn would have a lot of 3 game members in Tassie


what are these Free and $1 memberships all about ?   sound bogus

 

23 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

what are these Free and $1 memberships all about ?   sound bogus

Saints website: Buy now. Pay later. Break records.If only we had a $1 for every comment we've received on social media! Well, starting today, you can lock in your 2017 membership for just that, $1*

Who knows how many of those end up actually taking up a full membership - In the meantime they count in the numbers.

 

Adelaide website:

057e3cbb8fb27c0694f5a59a088a1f53bae9717d

I assume it is a non-game access membership for people who just want to stay in tune with what is going on at the club.  Certainly helps explain why their numbers have skyrocketed!

 

I think Collingwood has something similar for their overseas members (but I think they pay a token amount).

 

'Method in their madness':

1) Membership numbers count big time when AFL is doing the fixture with TV stations and who gets FTA prime spots.

2) They hope that one day these folk convert to full memberships.

Well it's all totally bogus......and why arent we doing it :rolleyes:

Pet memberships for $5  I'll  three..lol ^_^

Fair dinkum ...It's ridiculous , but no more so than counting them !!  fmd :wacko:

 
14 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Saints website: Buy now. Pay later. Break records.If only we had a $1 for every comment we've received on social media! Well, starting today, you can lock in your 2017 membership for just that, $1*

Who knows how many of those end up actually taking up a full membership - In the meantime they count in the numbers.

 

Adelaide website:

057e3cbb8fb27c0694f5a59a088a1f53bae9717d

I assume it is a non-game access membership for people who just want to stay in tune with what is going on at the club.  Certainly helps explain why their numbers have skyrocketed!

 

I think Collingwood has something similar for their overseas members (but I think they pay a token amount).

 

'Method in their madness':

1) Membership numbers count big time when AFL is doing the fixture with TV stations and who gets FTA prime spots.

2) They hope that one day these folk convert to full memberships.

 

3) it's another name and contact details to provide to sponsors to send emails etc to

Each club's slogan and part of respective membership campaign: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-12-24/on-the-campaign-trail-every-clubs-membership-slogan-plus-more

Sad to say our Sign up and be counted was one of the least inspiring (for me); along with We are Gold Coast and Be more Bulldog. 

What about: Here come the Demons! or Show your heart beats red and blue or whatever!  Reckon we can find something more inspiring to stir potential members, than Sign up and be counted.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 88 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 319 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies