Jump to content

The 2017 Membership Thread

Featured Replies

33 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Think we just leapfrogged the Saints in membership numbers too.

 

33 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Think we just leapfrogged the Saints in membership numbers too.

And that's actual legit members, not " Mickey Mouse" $1.00 maybe we will, maybe we won't members. 

 

We are about to have numbers that we got in June last year - we will easily get 40k and looking like 42k+ if we compete with Geelong and beat Freo and the Tigers at the G who knows where we will get to...

I understand that we will 'run out of people to sign up' but we are getting people out of the woodwork for the first time in a decade.

I don't think we know the numbers in the woodwork.

36 minutes ago, rpfc said:

I don't think we know the numbers in the woodwork.

I imagine there will be quite a few, but we will need to perform well for an extended period of time before we lure them back.

 
9 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

I imagine there will be quite a few, but we will need to perform well for an extended period of time before we lure them back.

Yes for them after decades of crap one swallow does not make it summer.

19 hours ago, old dee said:

30 Minutes before the game there was a long line at the membership shed.

I have never seen that before, it will be interesting to see how many signed up this week.

I was at gate 3 handing out scarves. The line to the membership shed was 50 people lomg 10 minutes before the bounce. I have never been so busy handing out carves as this weekend. Josh Wagner was there to meet and greet ended up assisting us, as there were 5 lines of 10 deep members to claim a scarf. It was flat stick from 2pm right up to game time and more wins mean more members. Josh was awesome and the number of surprised looks on members faces when they saw who was processing their members card and handing out a scarf was fantastic.


38 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Be interesting to know how many new or returning members we have already

My Guess 99% returning the rest new. 2019 after two power years are when new ones arrive.

Just now, old dee said:

My Guess 99% returning the rest new. 2019 after two power years are when new ones arrive.

old dee, is that you? Never thought I'd see you making a comment that suggests we'll have "two power years" in the near future. 

 
5 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

old dee, is that you? Never thought I'd see you making a comment that suggests we'll have "two power years" in the near future. 

LDC I know you are saying that with good humour however I am getting a bit annoyed.

IMO I have always said what I saw and we were terrible with a terrible list it was not rocket science to see it.

We now have a much better list that is going to improve, we are passed the easy beat stage.

I am now reflecting this improvement.

 

11 minutes ago, old dee said:

LDC I know you are saying that with good humour however I am getting a bit annoyed.

IMO I have always said what I saw and we were terrible with a terrible list it was not rocket science to see it.

We now have a much better list that is going to improve, we are passed the easy beat stage.

I am now reflecting this improvement.

 

i'm have trouble working out if this is the old old dee, the new old dee, the old new dee, the new new dee or just some identity thief who has hacked the account

given old dee never really got annoyed i'm going for the latter :)

 


21 minutes ago, old dee said:

My Guess 99% returning the rest new. 2019 after two power years are when new ones arrive.

 People love jumping on the new up and comers so they can say I was there before they were good. 

5 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

i'm have trouble working out if this is the old old dee, the new old dee, the old new dee, the new new dee or just some identity thief who has hacked the account

given old dee never really got annoyed i'm going for the latter :)

 

Just the original saying it the way it is dc

As I have always tried to do.

1 minute ago, Gorgoroth said:

 People love jumping on the new up and comers so they can say I was there before they were good. 

Same as the Rams G?

23 minutes ago, old dee said:

Same as the Rams G?

Ha ha, our band wagon is still rotting in some paddock in St. Louis. 

8 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

Ha ha, our band wagon is still rotting in some paddock in St. Louis. 

They are just waiting for the new stadium to fire up.


55 minutes ago, old dee said:

LDC I know you are saying that with good humour however I am getting a bit annoyed.

IMO I have always said what I saw and we were terrible with a terrible list it was not rocket science to see it.

We now have a much better list that is going to improve, we are passed the easy beat stage.

I am now reflecting this improvement.

 

old dee, it seems I may have annoyed you and for that I apologise. Perhaps I'm just a little unsure how I'm meant to behave after a 2-0 (or as some in the media insist in saying "two and oh") start to the year. I'm not used to such optimism and bonhomie. Nevertheless, I trust we can continue our friendly banter whatever the remainder of 2017 and beyond delivers.

5 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

old dee, it seems I may have annoyed you and for that I apologise. Perhaps I'm just a little unsure how I'm meant to behave after a 2-0 (or as some in the media insist in saying "two and oh") start to the year. I'm not used to such optimism and bonhomie. Nevertheless, I trust we can continue our friendly banter whatever the remainder of 2017 and beyond delivers.

Never thought it would be any other way LDC and I did say I knew the spirit you said it in.

Onward and upward

38,554 and still climbing!

3000 more than 2016

&

6000 more than 2015

at the first week in April!

So that is half of what PJ originally talked about. 

Winning is the only way. 

Ugly or Sweet Victories matters not

Good to see it climbing at a steady rate. My concern was that it would slow down dramatically. My membership renewed automatically for the first time this season, I'm guessing others were in the same boat. 


3 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

39,255

How good is this?  Less than 1,000 to 40k!!

I think we should be thinking 45K now!

Onwards and upwards!

27 minutes ago, Is Dom Is Good said:

I think we should be thinking 45K now!

Onwards and upwards!

>40k would set a good foundation for the next few years. If we can get it right onfield we should look to consolidate that to 45k and eventually 50k over the next 5 years or so.

 
5 hours ago, Is Dom Is Good said:

I think we should be thinking 45K now!

Onwards and upwards!

"39,255

How good is this?  Less than 1,000 to 40k!!"

Wiseblood has corrected his post, the figure was 38,255 and today at nearly 5pm it is still that number. (Just so we don't get over excited).

DIG, 45K is a long stretch for a club that reputedly had one of the lowest supporter bases 10 years ago and of course not much good news since then to boost it. 

I won't hold my breath, (mainly 'cos I worry I will jinx us), but 42K, should be possible this year.

 

Rates are slowing down now...

38299

MEMBERS SIGNED UP FOR 2017

40k is still going to happen but 45 is a target for next year after a good year this year!


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 24 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 131 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 36 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 522 replies
  • VOTES: Collingwood

    Max Gawn has an almost insurmountable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award ahead of Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver and Kozzy Pickett. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 42 replies