The demise of Majak Daw

[DemonLad5 1,642]

Delisted. Worth a look?

[John Dee 441]

No!!!

[deeflog 679]

No

[Tough Kent 2,077]

Court case next month.

[Demon Jack 6,439]

Yeahhhhhhhhh...No.

Edited October 29, 2015 by Demon Jack

[McQueen 17,864]

.......... No.

He's actually still innocent so you may want to withdraw that comment.

But yeah.

No.

Edited October 29, 2015 by McQueen

[ManDee 7,101]

He was 16 at the time of the alleged offences.

Is said to have had issues and working through them. Huge upside but maybe too much risk. A big no if guilty.

[AzzKikA 2,371]

Just got rid of Fitzy who could hardly get on the park, why bring another one in!?

NO.

[Wells 11 5,007]

He was 16 at the time of the alleged offences.

Is said to have had issues and working through them. Huge upside but maybe too much risk. A big no if guilty.

Of course, if guilty, no. However, I also see a huge upside if he's available.

[DubDee 22,061]

if he is cleared I reckon he would be a punt. could be one of those that comes good later in his career

word is, north will rookie him so we'd have to offer a spot on the snr list

[reynolds46 823]

if he is cleared I reckon he would be a punt. could be one of those that comes good later in his career

word is, north will rookie him so we'd have to offer a spot on the snr list

would have thought we could rookie him before North could if we were interested.

[Uncle Fester 2,843]

He's actually still innocent so you may want to withdraw that comment.

But yeah.

No.

Courts might play that game. I don't. When it comes to that stuff I have a very jaded and bias eye.

The courts play their games. I play mine.

[beelzebub 22,749]

Hmm..

the indecretions aside for the moment

hes an interesting commodity.

Possibly repurposed in a fashion as that Foward foil ?

I like this bloke years ago...Id take a punt . He has a lot of tricks in his bag.

Fresh start might be what he needs. Youd think Macca could sort his head out

Im in the yes here. I'll probably have few friends..lol

[McQueen 17,864]

Courts might play that game. I don't. When it comes to that stuff I have a very jaded and bias eye.

The courts play their games. I play mine.

Sure, Fester.

If you don't care about the potential ramifications (albeit as unlikely as they are) then you're not very good at 'your' game.

Edited October 29, 2015 by McQueen

[John Crow Batty 8,377]

Great natural athlete but lacks a footy brain and softer than Howe was. No more softcocks please.

[beelzebub 22,749]

Great natural athlete but lacks a footy brain and softer than Howe was. No more softcocks please.

soft ??? serious ?? Have never seen Howe give a "don't argue" to anyone or bring down Burgoyne on a chase down.. Actually does Howe even know how to tackle ?

Daw is far from perfect but he can run, find position...keep eyes on ball.. MARK.. ( something a similarly named bloke struggles with ) and can kick standing or running from 50 !!

Id happily Rookie him...be a bargain

[Bombay Airconditioning 6,024]

More highlights from his round 23 game away the Tigers then his namesake had all year and can ruck with some effectiveness.

Ready made depth player at worst.

But we've been through this all before.

[stuie 7,374]

King is a better bet than Daw.

[Bitter but optimistic 21,586]

King is a better bet than Daw.

Be even better if we could transplant about 15 kg of Daw's muscle onto him.

[Dommygun12 79]

I know you cant just hang on to a few good games but im preaty sure he booted 6 in a game and had a few other good games no harm for a year on a rookie spot

[rjay 24,202]

I know you cant just hang on to a few good games but im preaty sure he booted 6 in a game and had a few other good games no harm for a year on a rookie spot

North are planning to rookie list him...

[Still Waiting 94]

Has potential off-field baggage, has no footy nous, played 1 good game in his career thus far, we don't need another "could be anything, type" , would keep a young up-and-comer off our list, however he does offer a magnificent physique and athleticism. Not sure this warrants a spot at MFC.

[beelzebub 22,749]

King is a better bet than Daw.

a better bet as what ?

King is a project Ruckman really...thats about it

Daw can play a forward role and play 2nd ruck.

Two different roles

One HAS played AFL the other hasnt ( I dont count NAB.,..who does )

[daisycutter 28,728]

he's just a poor man's niknat

lacks the natural footballer's instinct

besides, can't spell his first name correctly

no for me

[stuie 7,374]

a better bet as what ?

King is a project Ruckman really...thats about it

Daw can play a forward role and play 2nd ruck.

Two different roles

One HAS played AFL the other hasnt ( I dont count NAB.,..who does )

You've just displayed how little you know.

King has been playing as a forward.

One has been delisted, the other hasn't. One has off field issues, the other doesn't.

Warnock has played lots of AFL, should we sign him up too?