Jump to content

2015 AFL National Draft prospects: The next batch

Featured Replies

 

This week's TAC Cup Future Stars top 20 -

1. Brisbane - Joshua Schache

2. Carlton - Jacob Weitering

3. Sydney* - Callum Mills

4. Gold Coast - Charlie Curnow

5. GWS* - Jacob Hopper

6. Essendon - Darcy Parish

7. Melbourne - Aaron Francis

8. St. Kilda - Darcy Tucker

9. Collingwood - Callum Ah Chee

10. Brisbane* - Ben Keays

11. GWS* - Matthew Kennedy

12. Geelong - Rhys Mathieson

13. Port Adelaide - Ryan Burton

14. Adelaide - Harley Balic

15. North Melbourne -Sam Weideman

16. Brisbane* - Eric Hipwood

17. Western Bulldogs - Harry McKay

18. Richmond - Kieran Collins

19. Hawthorn - Jade Gresham

20. Carlton - Bailey Rice **

* Academy bid

** Father/son

Jack can you please explain how the Sydney academy works and if it allows an early pick why don't all teams run an academy to take advantage?

 

Jack can you please explain how the Sydney academy works and if it allows an early pick why don't all teams run an academy to take advantage?

Because the AFL only want the northern clubs to have an unfair advantage.

So pick no 6 it is... Weitering and Schache lock for 1 & 2

GC, Dons and Saints up next and from what I have been reading looks like Parish, Balic and Curnow/Francis are next in line.

Which leaves us with the likes of

Curnow/Francis
Tucker

Mathieson

Ah Chee

No one really excites me this year and I'm hoping we trade down in the draft for some more experienced players.


Just watch out for Lovell. Wish we'd get him with a mid 1st round pick, despite his realtively low height he's just smashed the agility records for the draft, is incredibly fast/strong and has marvellous disposal. God help us if he goes to Hawthorn (which is projected)..

  • Author

Jack can you please explain how the Sydney academy works and if it allows an early pick why don't all teams run an academy to take advantage?

The four northern states run academies for players within designated regions and they have first call under the bidding system which works the same way as bidding for father/sons i.e other clubs can bid for an academy player and (in the case of a Sydney academy player) the Swans could match the bid and take the player. In the example you quoted above, Carlton would have bid for Callum Mills which forces Sydney to take him at 4. The AFL then attributes a price on a points scale and, as a result, their later choices would be diminished.

The AFL is applying the academy system only to the northern states because it can ...

This is Plough's TAC Cup Future Stars top 20 from last week -

1. Carlton - Jacob Weitering

2. Carlton - Joshua Schache

3. Sydney* - Callum Mills

4. Brisbane - Charlie Curnow

5. GWS* - Jacob Hopper

6. Gold Coast - Aaron Francis

7. Essendon - Darcy Parish

8. Melbourne - Callum Ah Chee

9. Brisbane* - Ben Keays

10. GWS* - Matthew Kennedy

11. St. Kilda - Darcy Tucker

12. Collingwood - Rhys Mathieson

13. Geelong - Harry McKay

14. Port Adelaide - Sam Weideman

15. North Melbourne - Kieran Collins

16. Adelaide - Wayne Milera

17. Western Bulldogs - Harley Balic

18. Richmond - Jade Gresham

19. Brisbane* - Eric Hipwood

20. Carlton - Bailey Rice **

* Academy bid

** Father/son

Look I like AH Chee but not for us, more icing IMO, if as above are available I hate missing out on Curnow but if unavailable Balic, Mathieson or Weidaman

 

  • Author

I don't know if Terry Wallace has any inside info or whether he just decided to dispense with the priority picks in his TAC Cup Future Stars top 20 draft picks but FWIW, he now has us getting Darcy Tucker:-

1. Carlton - Jacob Weitering

2. Brisbane - Joshua Schache

3. Sydney* - Callum Mills

4. Gold Coast - Charlie Curnow

5. GWS* - Jacob Hopper

6. Essendon - Darcy Parish

7. St. Kilda - Aaron Francis

8. Melbourne - Darcy Tucker

9. Brisbane* - Ben Keays

10. Collingwood - Kieran Collins

11. GWS* - Matthew Kennedy

12. Geelong - Rhys Mathieson

13. Port Adelaide - Harley Balic

14. North Melbourne - Callum Ah Chee

15. Western Bulldogs - Sam Weideman

16. Brisbane* - Eric Hipwood

17. Adelaide - Harry McKay

18. Richmond - Wayne Milera

19. Hawthorn - Jade Gresham

20. Carlton - Bailey Rice **

* Academy bid

** Father/son

Why are Brisbane and GWS getting two picks inside the first round?

Academy players. They'll need to make up the 'points' with other draft picks.

Why are Brisbane and GWS getting two picks inside the first round?

It's a never ending pay out for those GWS non entities isn't it. As for this academy horseshite, I declare the Melbourne Metro area ours.

Wayne Milera with 17 touches and 3 goals (including the match winner) for Centrals in SANFL finals.

Reckon he'll move into the top 10 on the back of his last couple of senior performances.


Gary Buckenara on the AFL draft as talked has 6 'bigs' in his top 10. His reasoning is that they are hard to come by and this year they are good. He said Weideman has a bit of Pavlich about him but that clubs would want to make sure his injury is ok. Said Curnow could surprise. Rated Collins at 3 - said clubs would work on his agility.

I would like us to pick up either Weideman or Curnow.

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't St Kilda pass on Petracca for McCartin because they didn't think this years draft crop had many good talls?

Seems half the top 10 are talls.

Oh well, worked out pretty well for us

Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't St Kilda pass on Petracca for McCartin because they didn't think this years draft crop had many good talls?

Seems half the top 10 are talls.

Oh well, worked out pretty well for us

Always go best available. Reckon the Saints might regret last year. You don't need to go tall with pick #1 just because they appear to be the best available tall. Look at Bruce.

Always go best available. Reckon the Saints might regret last year. You don't need to go tall with pick #1 just because they appear to be the best available tall. Look at Bruce.

Lucas Cook definitely backs up that theory

if we have the pick (which i kinda hope we don't; i want it traded for a true mid who can come in and impose straight away), i reckon milera is looking a strong possibility.

we're unlikely to go for collins given the mcdonalds, frost, garland and dunn of our backline world, and i would expect mathieson to be favoured over tucker anyway.

but milera is getting hot at exactly the right time of the year. if his agility and arcane testing stuff is as good as his performances have been for centrals, he'll zoom up the charts.


if we have the pick (which i kinda hope we don't; i want itSo traded for a true mid who can come in and impose straight away), i reckon milera is looking a strong possibility.

we're unlikely to go for collins given the mcdonalds, frost, garland and dunn of our backline world, and i would expect mathieson to be favoured over tucker anyway.

but milera is getting hot at exactly the right time of the year. if his agility and arcane testing stuff is as good as his performances have been for centrals, he'll zoom up the charts.

Sorry 'Andrew', I don't really rate SANFL form anymore...

Always go best available. Reckon the Saints might regret last year. You don't need to go tall with pick #1 just because they appear to be the best available tall. Look at Bruce.

We rated McCartin number one - as did St Kilda.

We rated McCartin number one - as did St Kilda.

I think we might have rated Heeney as number one but how would you know unless you're part of the inner circle.

 

We rated McCartin number one - as did St Kilda.

We would have picked Brayshaw first before Mccartin.

Fact.

I think we might have rated Heeney as number one but how would you know unless you're part of the inner circle.

I am going by the book the The Draftees - which states if we had the number one pick it would have been hard to choose between McCartin and Heeney with Petracca, Brayshaw and Lever rated behind the pair.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 387 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies