Jump to content

WELCOME TO DEMONLAND - PAUL ROOS

Featured Replies

Good to see he can't spell Trengove's name like most Dee's people so he would fit in well. I find it interesting not that pick 1 or 3 would be on the table but that he would trade them for the best mid he could get.

Tom Boyd will go No. 1 (you know what happens to No.1's we pick)

We want midfielders, If we got No.1 as PP why not put him on the table to entice an up and running midfielder or 2.

Edited by Chippy

 

Here's a different spin on Roos' article. It is part of his interview process with Peter Jackson, given that Jackson pitched to him on the Monday night via On the Couch.

Just so they don't waste time down the track. Brilliant! They are using the media to conduct the interview process! :)

Absolutely.

Really appreciate the insight you give on here mate, give me alot more confidence that things are getting better for us as a club, so in your opinion Watts will walk if we signed Choco for example?

I don't know this, rather he will sign if Roos signs.

 

I don't know this, rather he will sign if Roos signs.

Either way it's all very exciting.

I don't like reading too much into things, but there was one marked difference in his sentiments regarding our on-field capabilities. A couple of times recently he's said, "Melbourne supporters might have to understand that they may not win a game next year", which is a far cry from "if the Demons get everything right they could have a competitive team next year".


I don't like reading too much into things, but there was one marked difference in his sentiments regarding our on-field capabilities. A couple of times recently he's said, "Melbourne supporters might have to understand that they may not win a game next year", which is a far cry from "if the Demons get everything right they could have a competitive team next year".

That would suggest he is looking at the list pretty closely, he has certainly got an idea of players specifically.

The facts are he again had a perfect opportunity to politely let us down. BUT HE DID NOT.

Clearly this is an open letter to members, board members and the AFL of what his requirements are. He wants to coach us, but these things are non negotiable.

Unusual for me to look at things negatively, but he doesn't need to convince members of his position, just the AFL (and 'our' board). So why would he do that by an open letter rather than private talks?

 

I don't like reading too much into things, but there was one marked difference in his sentiments regarding our on-field capabilities. A couple of times recently he's said, "Melbourne supporters might have to understand that they may not win a game next year", which is a far cry from "if the Demons get everything right they could have a competitive team next year".

Well, there are two ways of reading that... He may be simply making an observation and advising us not to expect miracles from whoever is to coach us next year, or he could be covering his own backside in the event that he takes on the role.

Unusual for me to look at things negatively, but he doesn't need to convince members of his position, just the AFL (and 'our' board). So why would he do that by an open letter rather than private talks?

He does need to convince members he has the passion to do it, literally the only knock people have on him coaching us is that he has no fire in the belly so it would be a malcom blight situation, it's clear he is at the very least not totally against coaching at this point.


He does need to convince members he has the passion to do it, literally the only knock people have on him coaching us is that he has no fire in the belly so it would be a malcom blight situation, it's clear he is at the very least not totally against coaching at this point.

That may well be the only knock, but I don't think he needs to convince us supporters he has the fire to get the job. We aren't involved. Sure we may well like to see 'fire' but it doesn't matter much to those calling the shots how we feel. Does anyone think that if he gets the job he won't express how passionate he is about it? Will any member call him a liar at that point and push for someone else to coach? We'll just cross our fingers and hope he means it.

Tom Boyd will go No. 1 (you know what happens to No.1's we pick)

We want midfielders, If we got No.1 as PP why not put him on the table to entice an up and running midfielder or 2.

There is a difference between putting it on the table for and taking the right offer and putting it on the table and taking the best offer you can get. Who would you want from StKilda, Brisbane, Carlton or Western Bulldogs to be willing to trade it?

That may well be the only knock, but I don't think he needs to convince us supporters he has the fire to get the job. We aren't involved. Sure we may well like to see 'fire' but it doesn't matter much to those calling the shots how we feel. Does anyone think that if he gets the job he won't express how passionate he is about it? Will any member call him a liar at that point and push for someone else to coach? We'll just cross our fingers and hope he means it.

We're the ones he needs to sell hope to, the revival includes getting respectable crowds again and all of those sorts of things.

still find this all very bizarre .

Bit like emperors new clothes . Its all out there and not much left to the imagination but lets not call it for what it is.

tis open flirting lol

We're the ones he needs to sell hope to, the revival includes getting respectable crowds again and all of those sorts of things.

Sure, but you have things out of order. If Roos is appointed coach he will doubtless say he has the 'fire'; why does he need to convince us of that now (given we have no real say in who is appointed)? Will crowds be lower because some supporters don't believe the new coach has the fire? I think not - improvements and WINS will be what draws the crowds.


There is a difference between putting it on the table for and taking the right offer and putting it on the table and taking the best offer you can get. Who would you want from StKilda, Brisbane, Carlton or Western Bulldogs to be willing to trade it?

Would LOVE Jack Stevens in red n blue. He has come on massively this year. As a young midfielder he has pace, decent skills, ball winning ability, goal kicking ability, he really is a well rounded package. His bursting out of congestion this year has been like a younger Judd. He's exactly what we need so I'd gladly give up pick 1 for him and pick.

I get it Paul...

you were just having a lend of us suggesting we could turn it around fairly quickly

but then again we can turn and turn and turn it around...because thats what you do when youre SCREWED !!

and we are sure as ( inser t fav word of disgust )

youre a funny man Roosey !!! yes you are.

There is a difference between putting it on the table for and taking the right offer and putting it on the table and taking the best offer you can get. Who would you want from StKilda, Brisbane, Carlton or Western Bulldogs to be willing to trade it?

lets start with Hanley and Rich.

as many have said it will be difficult to trade for A grade mids, maybe we need to look at multiple B+ mids with A grade potential. should get better value also.


He may be thinking that the last time the giants won was this round last year and that was Port Adelaide.

New coaches, board, CEO.

Mmmm

My stupid post match/scotch conspiracy: AFL tells Melbourne we will give you Roos,Cash and extra picks. Just give GW$ the win.

 

My stupid post match/scotch conspiracy: AFL tells Melbourne we will give you Roos,Cash and extra picks. Just give GW$ the win.

promise !!!

Would LOVE Jack Stevens in red n blue. He has come on massively this year. As a young midfielder he has pace, decent skills, ball winning ability, goal kicking ability, he really is a well rounded package. His bursting out of congestion this year has been like a younger Judd. He's exactly what we need so I'd gladly give up pick 1 for him and pick.

If Melb gets pick 1 they take Boyd. Full stop.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    It was bad enough that the Melbourne Football Club created yet another humiliating scenario inside its wretched season at Marvel Stadium last Sunday, but the final insult is that it has been commanded to return to the scene of the crime to inflict further punishment on its fans this week. Incidentally, if this match preview, of a game that promises to be one of the most unattractive fixtures in the history of the game, happens to cut out of your computer screen three quarters of the way through, it’s no coincidence. I’ll be mirroring the Demons’ lacklustre effort against St Kilda from last Sunday when they conceded the largest last quarter turnaround for victory in the history of the game.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 3 replies
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 9 replies
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 251 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Angry
      • Sad
      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 484 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 27 replies