5th on the ladder...

[Brettmcg 24]

Great to see crowds returning to Demons games. We are 5th on the total and home game attendance ladder following only Carlton, Collingwood, St. Kilda and Richmond!

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/attendances?year=2010&t=A&h=H&s=T

[DeezMan 4]

Great to see crowds returning to Demons games. We are 5th on the total and home game attendance ladder following only Carlton, Collingwood, St. Kilda and Richmond!

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/attendances?year=2010&t=A&h=H&s=T

Verrrry positive!! hopefully we can sustain and even improve on that!!! Jimmy has played a big part in it all.

[Disco Demons 92]

would like to see how many are mcc members. . .

[bananas 428]

That is absolutely unreal. Our club's resurgence is a helluva lot more than empty words, we're coming for sure!

(credit where it's due, good job Richmond fans as well)

[jnrmac 19,481]

That's because we have had a lot of Saturday games at the 'G to start the year (8 fm the first 9 rds) playing against Cartel,Coll (twice), Ess and the Toiges.

[jnrmac 19,481]

Great to see crowds returning to Demons games. We are 5th on the total and home game attendance ladder following only Carlton, Collingwood, St. Kilda and Richmond!

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/attendances?year=2010&t=A&h=H&s=T

We are 6th on total crowds (H & A). That includes a paltry 8000 or so at Darwin!

Norf are in trouble 11,000 less than us on average per game.

Edited July 12, 2010 by jnrmac

[Deefolt 0]

We are 6th on total crowds (H & A). That includes a paltry 8000 or so at Darwin!

Norf are in trouble 11,000 less than us on average per game.

i was about to mention we are 6th, essendon is above us in averages not total, we have had 8 home they have had 6

[jackaub 1,402]

would like to see how many are mcc members. . .

I have been in the members all year for demon games

It is reularly full. Its the fullest that I have experienced in 20 years so the MFC is succeeding in translating MCC to Mfc which stands at aprroximately 25% of MCC members supporting the Demons

[drdrake 3,059]

With three home games to go against Sydney, Richmond and North we should be able to push our home game attendence above 400,000 for the year. We should get over 50K at the Richmond game and hopefully over 30K for each of the other two. Its amazing the difference the draw makes. We have home games against Hawthorn, Collingwood, Essendon, Richmond at the MCG, when you compare that to North Melbournes draw we have been blessed by the AFL this year.

[Finks 19]

i was about to mention we are 6th, essendon is above us in averages not total, we have had 8 home they have had 6

certainly an improvement from 2009 where we were second last in both average attendance per game and total attendance.

in fact, we just exceeded last years total attendance by 2000 with 3 games less.

nice.

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

That's because we have had a lot of Saturday games at the 'G to start the year (8 fm the first 9 rds) playing against Cartel,Coll (twice), Ess and the Toiges.

Agree. Too many people take the crowd numbers at face value without considering the visiting opposition we are playing this year as opposed to last year.

[Daz's Dee's 113]

Wait till were a top 4 team!

[Hannabal 4]

Agree. Too many people take the crowd numbers at face value without considering the visiting opposition we are playing this year as opposed to last year.

True, but I'm more interested in the associated positives.

1) It's one less thing to defend in the media

2) The bottom line

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

True, but I'm more interested in the associated positives.

1) It's one less thing to defend in the media

2) The bottom line

Agree on both but that not the inferences posters make from these stats.

[beelzebub 22,703]

I must fess a Sat arvo is my pref. Given a noted push away from these sat games .. Well seems like some sort of agenda in practice should we make even more of a push to be that team in Melbourne that takes the sat arvo game at the G ? If we are more and more about embellishing our heritage and relevance to this city would this not help cement it ? Melbourne , sat arvo at the G watching Melbourne because that IS Melbourne !!!

[Jaded No More 59,760]

Agree. Too many people take the crowd numbers at face value without considering the visiting opposition we are playing this year as opposed to last year.

I understand where you're coming from, but really in years gone by we've had most of our home games set against interstate teams, which is unfair.

I don't think any Victorian team, no matter how much of a powerhouse, can get a decent crowd against Freo or Port. It's unrealistic.

This year we've received home games, for the first time in YEARS, against teams like Essendon, and it's paying off.

[beelzebub 22,703]

On that very note how dif it might have been had we played Ess at that 'other' place ? So much better in so many ways at the G

[drdrake 3,059]

The most pleasing side has been our crowd numbers against interstate teams. From memory we have 36K against Brisbane, 23K Adelaide and just under 30K West Coast.

[Tricky 340]

would like to see how many are mcc members. . .

Interesting, and also of interest would be how many attendees have been non mfc members.

On that very note how dif it might have been had we played Ess at that 'other' place ? So much better in so many ways at the G

So true. But let's not speak of that s$%thole

[Old Gregg 1]

The most pleasing side has been our crowd numbers against interstate teams. From memory we have 36K against Brisbane, 23K Adelaide and just under 30K West Coast.

True - and also around 45k against the Doggies on a wet Friday night

[Grandson of a gun 276]

True, but I'm more interested in the associated positives.

1) It's one less thing to defend in the media

2) The bottom line

Very true on both counts.

IT also bodes well for Melbourne's fixture submissions for next year. We have proved we can play exciting footy in the big games and we can draw a good crowd even against interstate and low drawing teams. Very interesting that we are above teams like Geelong and Hawthorn.

Hopefully that translates into more Friday / Sat games at the G for the Demons next year and beyond.

(although taking the AFL's perspective they may also say that because we have also drawn well in Sunday games they will keep us there).

[Brettmcg 24]

Agree on both but that not the inferences posters make from these stats.

I think you are forgetting that we have also drawn reasonable crowds to home games at the G against non-Victorian sides.

In the first 8 rounds we played 7 games at the MCG, 4 of which were home games, but only 2 were against Victorian sides (Hawthorn R1, Bulldogs R7). In the next 7 rounds we've had 3 home games at the MCG, admittedly all of which are against high-drawing Victorian sides. Both St. Kilda and Richmond have had home games against big-drawing clubs and are, on average, only drawing 900-1000 more people through the gate. I think that's a pretty exceptional effort on the MFCs behalf considering the dismal attendance figures of the past few years. A sign that disillusioned punters might be returning after the nuclear football winter.

As other posters have mentioned, strong attendances mean one less thing the media can attack us over. Furthermore, these numbers look increasingly lucrative to organisations unsure of where to place their sponsorship dollar. More spectators at the grounds means greater potential for exposure to sponsor brands etc.

[Demon Rob 2]

We are 6th on total crowds (H & A). That includes a paltry 8000 or so at Darwin!

Norf are in trouble 11,000 less than us on average per game.

take out darwin and we are up to 42000 average. Not bad.

North are terminal unfortunately.