If we are going to use pick 37 we have to delist a player and rookie them, unless both White and Sinnema are both rookies. Who will it be?

2 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

White and Sinnema are both rookies

This looks likely.

3 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

This looks likely.

OK so our team will more likely look like this.

B: Lever, Petty, Salem

HB: Lindsay, Turner, Bowey

C: Culley (a), Steele, Langford

HF: Chandler, van Rooyen, Langdon

F: Fritsch, Mihocek, Melksham

FOLL: Gawn, Rivers, Pickett

IC: Windsor, Viney, Sparrow, Tholstrup, Jiath

EMERG: Pick 7, Pick 8, Howes

Casey

B: Adams, May, Berry (b)

HB: Howes, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield (a)

C: Sinnema (a), Laurie, Sharp

HF: Henderson (a), Johnson, Mentha (b)

F: McAdam, Kentfield (a), Jefferson

FOLL: Campbell, Pick 7, Pick 8

IC: Heath, White (a), Pick 37, Bonner, Cross

EMERG: Smith, Yze, Freeman

56 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

If we are going to use pick 37 we have to delist a player and rookie them, unless both White and Sinnema are both rookies. Who will it be?

Our current primary list is 33 so if there are bids on either/both of White and Sinnema we have space to match the bids. Likely we rookie them in any case. Pick 37 can be used without fear of losing them to bids.

@WERRIDEE just starting threads to post more best 23’s

WERRIDEE is as WERRIDEE does

2 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

If we are going to use pick 37 we have to delist a player and rookie them, unless both White and Sinnema are both rookies. Who will it be?

We can have up to 38 on the PL so should be fine in either case.

The only complication is a bid on White/Sinema after ND37 and we have to trade in picks with points to then match.

1 hour ago, BW511 said:

@WERRIDEE just starting threads to post more best 23’s

And every time he gets us

1 hour ago, rpfc said:

We can have up to 38 on the PL so should be fine in either case.

The only complication is a bid on White/Sinema after ND37 and we have to trade in picks with points to then match.

The points discount is 10% but then it's locked in at 195pts after round 1.

Pick 43 is worth 184pts, so from there the discount outweighs the cost so no picks are required to match.

37 to 43 is a tight window so we'd have to be very unlucky, mind you 37 should come in a fair way as picks get eaten up matching bids, so the window will be wider.

3 hours ago, BW511 said:

@WERRIDEE just starting threads to post more best 23’s

Demonland would be lost without my best 23's

1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

Demonland would be lost without my best 23's

I’m already lost.

16 hours ago, Redleg said:

I’m already lost.

Yeah, Red. Remember the good 'ol days when we only had to count up to 19?

I'm more lost than Bailey Smith at a critical thinking symposium.

lol

Can we delist McAdam and forget to re-rookie him? Or Laurie?

2 minutes ago, poita said:

Can we delist McAdam and forget to re-rookie him? Or Laurie?

I cant believe these two are taking up space

Apparently Sydney are delisting Rampe and Lloyd and then rookieing them.

500 odd games between the pair... perfect rookie candidates

4 hours ago, poita said:

Can we delist McAdam and forget to re-rookie him?

This part I agree with, The savings on medical costs prob offsets his wage.