I think whoever the new coach is, the conversation with May is pretty simple. You basically say to him, "Mayzy you've got one year left on your contract, but you won't be playing at AFL level except in the case of an injury crisis. We look forward to you helping develop our VFL talent. If you're unhappy with that, then we're happy for you to seek a new home if a trade can be done".

1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Contracted to 2027

[censored] me! 🤦‍♂️

3 hours ago, doomsday dee said:

But the 1goal 5 in the last wasnt a telling factor

And two out on the full.

Id keep him. Still showed against Geelong and Adelaide that he still has what it takes for perhaps a final crack at it.

You look at Adelaide, GWS, Bulldogs, Fremantle, Brisbane with all these gun key forward pairings, you’d be foolish to let him go especially how deplorable the midfield had been in terms of pressure and work rate, leaving the defense as sitting ducks.

May never had pace, he was never pacey and athletic like other full backs like Alex Rance, he’s your traditional 1 v 1 gorilla.

Asides from T-Mac, we really have no other body on body full back. I’m hoping with a new game style and more accountability, May can help the climb hopefully back into The top 6, even if he plays 13 games next season and managed a lot.

Edited August 23Aug 23 by VNightCityLegend

On 22/08/2025 at 15:31, Damo said:

I dont know who of our veterans have been playing with injuries and are not at their best.

Viney, Salem, Tracc, May and Lever could all have been struggling with injuries. Until that puzzle is unlocked I think it is difficult to make a call. If many of them have been playing with injury, then next season things might get rosy again.

Every player, especially anyone right on 30 years of age and at this time of the year will be either playing sore or a niggle. Long season and alot of training at this time of year is based around recovery, sharp skills touch and injury prevention

Lets not attempt excuses because I can guarantee every club are carrying sore and injured players.

No player is rosy at this time of the year.

2 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

[censored] me! 🤦‍♂️

Garbage list management really.

1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Garbage list management really.

Don't necessarily want to pile on Sharp but how he got 17 games while Laurie and Billings dominated VFL every week is beyond me.

3 minutes ago, Random Task said:

Don't necessarily want to pile on Sharp but how he got 17 games while Laurie and Billings dominated VFL every week is beyond me.

I said the exact same thing in the post match thread.

I know it wont happen but I hope thats the last we ever see him in red and blue as thr new coach will quickly realise that hes a suburban standard type player.

3 hours ago, At the break of Gawn said:

I think whoever the new coach is, the conversation with May is pretty simple. You basically say to him, "Mayzy you've got one year left on your contract, but you won't be playing at AFL level except in the case of an injury crisis. We look forward to you helping develop our VFL talent. If you're unhappy with that, then we're happy for you to seek a new home if a trade can be done".

My understanding is that that was almost exactly the conversation with TMac at the start of this season.

I’d be surprised if we ever start a game with Gawn, Oliver, Petracca and Viney at the bounce again.

7 hours ago, beelzebub said:

247 by my count

249

28 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

249

Just checked ... seems you are indeed correct.

3 hours ago, Random Task said:

Don't necessarily want to pile on Sharp but how he got 17 games while Laurie and Billings dominated VFL every week is beyond me.

Caaaryst yes

3 hours ago, Random Task said:

Don't necessarily want to pile on Sharp but how he got 17 games while Laurie and Billings dominated VFL every week is beyond me.

4 hours ago, Random Task said:

Don't necessarily want to pile on Sharp but how he got 17 games while Laurie and Billings dominated VFL every week is beyond me.

You clearly haven't watched Billings or Laurie at AFL level.

2 minutes ago, Mono said:

You clearly haven't watched Billings or Laurie at AFL level.

I have. I have also seen more than enough of Sharp. All 3 shouldn't be in our plans going forward. But at least reward form and drop poor performance.

On 22/08/2025 at 11:27, Bang Bang Bang said:

I would envisage all those players bar McVee being there next year. May would be a chance to retire, but he’s already signed for ‘26. Maybe TMac?

💯 I'd rather another year by Tmac than May. Why on earth did we sign up May for another year?

Unfortunately Steven May has become a liability. Continually looking disappointed at his teammates when he should be looking in the mirror, too slow, terrible below his knees, out-positioned and struggling to hold marks like he used to.

Time to reward Adams in 2026

15 hours ago, BDA said:

that moment changed the game. horrible turnover in the worst possible spot.

1 goal 5 in the last cost the game

14 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

I can tell you that Clarrie has been playing with sore (very tender) ribs for at least three weeks.

That must be the same as Salem,doesn't do any maning up at all

6 hours ago, Random Task said:

I have. I have also seen more than enough of Sharp. All 3 shouldn't be in our plans going forward. But at least reward form and drop poor performance.

Yep and this was a failure of Goodwin, excaberated by Chaplin

6 hours ago, doomsday dee said:

1 goal 5 in the last cost the game

And two out on the full.

21 hours ago, The heart beats true said:

The umpire was standing 5 minutes away screaming at him to move back and Jake just didn’t hear.

I actually hate that rule. The players don’t know exactly where they are on the ground, and it’s also the loudest part of the stadium. They need to get a little more leeway IMO. Protected zone is protected zone everywhere, but knowing that you’re 9 minutes from goal, not 11 is asking a lot.

Considering he gave away a 50 for the same rule earlier this season he should be well aware of it.

I'm torn on Melksham, on one hand he offers something up forward being a rare player with goal sense. On the other he plays lazy footy a lot of the time, playing from behind trying to work his opponent under the ball or take a speccy which rarely comes off. This is probably due to age/speed but it is still a limitation which is frustrating. If we had another quicker option I wouldn't be offering him another year (or only on the proviso he will be depth and likely play out the season at Casey).

1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Considering he gave away a 50 for the same rule earlier this season he should be well aware of it.

I'm torn on Melksham, on one hand he offers something up forward being a rare player with goal sense. On the other he plays lazy footy a lot of the time, playing from behind trying to work his opponent under the ball or take a speccy which rarely comes off. This is probably due to age/speed but it is still a limitation which is frustrating. If we had another quicker option I wouldn't be offering him another year (or only on the proviso he will be depth and likely play out the season at Casey).

If he can get on the park and show some form, Shane McAdam may well take Jake’s place next season - similar mercurial player, same height, but 3 or 4 years younger and quicker and has a better leap.

Edited August 23Aug 23 by Neil Crompton

14 hours ago, Fanatique Demon said:

I’d be surprised if we ever start a game with Gawn, Oliver, Petracca and Viney at the bounce again.

I'd be upset, it's time to move on if we want to climb ever again.

14 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

If he can get on the park and show some form, Shane McAdam may well take Jake’s place next season - similar mercurial player, same height, but 3 or 4 years younger and quicker and has a better leap.

"If can get on park"

See what you did there..

21 hours ago, Random Task said:

Don't necessarily want to pile on Sharp but how he got 17 games while Laurie and Billings dominated VFL every week is beyond me.

The game genuinely changed when he came on

The complete opposite desired effect of the sub