Jump to content

Featured Replies

Best team we have had on the park all year.

Like the forward line, much better than last week.

No excuses to not be competitive this week.

 
Just now, Vineytime said:

Best team we have had on the park all year.

Like the forward line, much better than last week.

No excuses to not be competitive this week.

Aging Bon Voyage GIF by Kim's Convenience

9 hours ago, Brownie said:

I think there's a long term problem now with our backline too.

May is getting sorer and a bit slower every year.

I don't think Jake's body will last much longer either.

So, by the end of this year, we could be looking to replace our backbone.

It's quite a challenge with the likes of Petty going forward to try and prop up our forward line.

It's great that disco can swing forward or back but for mine, he's better as a forward and should be Fritschs replacement.

We're lucky Tmacs is having a stellar season. He's really bounced back this year.

Our young forward line isnt working while our backline is ageing fast.

It must be incredibly hard for some of the younger blokes to find their rhythm with positional changes and no clear cohesion in game plans right now.

I feel for the likes of Kolt and JVR going in and out of the side while Fritsch seems to get a free ride.

Let's hope we can continue to run and tackle hard like last week and lower our eyes and kick straight this week.

We follow a perplexing team of perplexed players

I'm on a similar line here Brownie and a fair assessment in general from you.

My only issue is that we should've taken advantage of such a stalwart backline earlier. Had we got our act together up forward from about the end of 2022 onwards. I'm not sure what this would have meant in terms of progressing beyond semis for two years running but pretty sure we wouldn't have gone out in straight sets in two consecutive years.

The price we'll pay as you say, will not only be still having to solve the forward issues (including personnel) but then having to find the replacements for some of the aging KDs in the next season or two.

I too am a huge backer of Turner playing almost always as a forward. Unless we lose the likes of a Petty or need to stack the backline to protect a lead or hold up an oppo on a big momentum run.

I've been saying this for quite a while now. That's not to say Disco isn't a good defender either. He's very good. But his mobility and marking prowess up forward plus his reasonably accurate set shot kicking, is something we've sorely lacked so far in 2025 and pretty much the last 2.5 seasons post BBB. Add to that the fact that he is also showing some significant signs that it's all starting to click for him in terms of running patterns / forward craft and getting some reward for effort on the scoreboard.

His pressure is quite reasonable also at ground level without the ball for a taller player. Just guessing on this from what i'm seeing though, i haven't checked the numbers to back that up.

While i'm not saying he will become a Neita or someone like that as he doesn't have a No.1 KF build or top end forward talent about him, i can see him becoming a very handy 2nd stringer IF we can find someone to put into the No.1 role to help him out.

Does that No.1 Key Forward come from the existing list? Not for mine. We'll need to go on a serious hunt to grab one imo. It's that or we are going to flounder and flop around for years trying to find home grown NQR solutions through the draft that probably won't do our forward stocks much justice in the short to medium term. Then there's the old adage, top end experienced KFs don't grow on trees and also tend not to find their way to the MFC. So there is that.

Alot of things AFL look easier from behind the keyboard.

 
7 hours ago, deanox said:

When the match committee doesn't make changes Goodwin is stubborn, and has favourites.

When the match committee makes changes, Goodwin is trying to save his career instead of letting players develop.

When the match committee doesn't pick kids, Goodwin is letting them languish at VFL and is the reason they leave.

When the match committee picks kids and they don't perform, Goodwin isn't developing kids properly.

When the match committee doesn't drop senior players to play afringe, Goodwin doesn't have selection integrity and plays favourites

When the match committee drops senior players and fringe players who aren't AFL standard, then Goodwin has no idea and keeps selecting duds.

We aren't winning games, so there is critism no matter what happens.

I personally don't think they've got the selection right this week. The side is unbalanced. But the constant slagging of "selection integrity" is ridiculous.

Morgan Freeman Applause GIF by The Academy Awards

2 hours ago, bing181 said:

No it hasn't. You're seeing what you want to see.

No, I see what I see.

You've got a set of rosy red and blue glasses you've struggled to take off since 2022.


AJ 2nd ruck bringing some aggression

Petty stay at home fwd

Turner intercept backman

Balance looks better than last week

16 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

T

I've been saying this for quite a while now. That's not to say Disco isn't a good defender either. He's very good. But his mobility and marking prowess up forward plus his reasonably accurate set shot kicking, is something we've sorely lacked so far in 2025 and pretty much the last 2.5 seasons post BBB. Add to that the fact that he is also showing some significant signs that it's all starting to click for him in terms of running patterns / forward craft and getting some reward for effort on the scoreboard.

His pressure is quite reasonable also at ground level without the ball for a taller player. Just guessing on this from what i'm seeing though, i haven't checked the numbers to back that up.

While i'm not saying he will become a Neita or someone like that as he doesn't have a No.1 KF build or top end forward talent about him, i can see him becoming a very handy 2nd stringer IF we can find someone to put into the No.1 role to help him out.

Your comments are totally fanciful. Turner has played about 3 games in defence & at best is competent.

Up forward he has sometimes been good & sometimes poor to average.

You need to be realistic not in la la land.

25 minutes ago, binman said:

I can't see rhe logic in bringing in AJ and making him sub given they dropped JVR- who is going to bevtge second ruck?

Leaving that aside he can only really play forward or on the ruck, so doesn't offer much positional flexibility as a sub.

Unless he is not the sub? Is there a slim chance that might end up being Fritta?

 
2 hours ago, RedLegs23 said:

So obviously A. Johnson will be the sub.

Thoughts?

Obviously?

Sharp or Spargs will be sub this week, I don't think you need to nominate from your extended bench. Plus, we have pretty much ran a half forward as sub the whole year.

Losing ANB was a huge deal and we massively lack depth at HF. The only clear 22 half forwards are Sparrow, Chandler and Kozzy (who is more of a mid these days).

Otherwise, Spargo and Fritta are our most senior mature players in this position. We are left to choose from Kolt (limited pre season, not in great form), Sharp (not in great form), Laurie (historically has struggled at HF), Kynan (young and inexperienced) and Henderson (same as Kynan).

I don't this is is a selection integrity issue, it's just the reality of who is available on the list.


2 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

In: Johnson, Melksham, Petty

Out: JVR, Jefferson, Tholstrup

I don’t subscribe to @dazzledavey36 ’s level of criticism of “selection integrity” but I do believe our selection week to week this year has been confusing to say the least, and probably reflects that the club doesn’t know what our best forward set up is. Constantly flipping between the talls, picking them off no form then dropping them after one or two games, going with one tall, then two, now three(?) (Turner, Petty, Johnson). I can’t get around it tbh.

Turner won't play forward. Petty will play permanent forward with AJ doing the backup rucking it seems.

6 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Okay i agree Fritsch is horribly out of form but can we stop the no tackles name tag?

last week he actually tackled unlike other weeks.

he had 4 including 2 inside 50 tackles so if he is finally starting to do what the coaches ask….

someone is paying attention.

1 hour ago, Vineytime said:

Best team we have had on the park all year.

Like the forward line, much better than last week.

No excuses to not be competitive this week.

As named we have at least 2 premiership players on every line and another on the bench. I was pessimistic at the start of the week but I agree if we're not competitive this week, it doesnt look good for the next month.

I like that if Petty doesn't work up forward we can swap him with Turner. I think both are better in the backline but we just don't have an in-form forward so that's what we have to work with.

May is aging quickly but Lever still has a lot of good footy in him. His ankles have always been a problem, no more now than in the past. It will be great to get him back on the park next week, along with Viney (if he can carry on from where he left off).

I think Spargo is an asset and his worth can't be measured in goals alone. We need players with good disposal efficiency in the team. He may not have a big kick but he hits targets and is creative with his use.

I don't give us a chance this week but I would love to be surprised!

2 hours ago, binman said:

I can't see rhe logic in bringing in AJ and making him sub given they dropped JVR- who is going to bevtge second ruck?

Leaving that aside he can only really play forward or on the ruck, so doesn't offer much positional flexibility as a sub.

My query on AJ is that he's been manhandled whenever he's gone into the ruck. I like work at ground level in the stoppage and in the forward half though. But he doesn't look threatening as a scoreboard option.

But let's see how he goes. I'm hoping we can lay 10+ forward 50 tackles. Do that and we'll be in the game if we take our chances when they present.


15 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

We’re a chance. Our fitness is the biggest concern for mine

Our goalkicking is mine.

13 minutes ago, Maximum said:

I like that if Petty doesn't work up forward we can swap him with Turner. I think both are better in the backline but we just don't have an in-form forward so that's what we have to work with.

May is aging quickly but Lever still has a lot of good footy in him. His ankles have always been a problem, no more now than in the past. It will be great to get him back on the park next week, along with Viney (if he can carry on from where he left off).

I think Spargo is an asset and his worth can't be measured in goals alone. We need players with good disposal efficiency in the team. He may not have a big kick but he hits targets and is creative with his use.

I don't give us a chance this week but I would love to be surprised!

How can a forwards worth not be measured in goals? If it is possessions, fleet of foot, defensive pressure and impact on the game, Spargo does not have that either.

9 hours ago, DubDee said:

I think this is part of the reason we moved Windsor back to HB

We need some dash and skill off HB.

Bowey also being used as our primary distibutor off HB

sadly Salo is way way below his past high standards.

2 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Unless he is not the sub? Is there a slim chance that might end up being Fritta?

I don't think AJ will be sub.

Fritter wouldn't be a crazy choice. Ia also a bit inflexible position wise but not as bad as AJ.

And he could cover a tall or medium forward.


5 hours ago, Adam The God said:

Turner won't play forward. Petty will play permanent forward with AJ doing the backup rucking it seems.

They have Hipwood and Morris as tall forwards. Only two right? They’ve dropped Fort. So do we need three tall defenders?

Is there any chance that they have planned for a ‘late out’ (no idea who) and that all five currently on the bench will be in the starting 22 and Laurie becomes the sub?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 10

    The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 87 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

    • 11 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 271 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Like
    • 53 replies
    Demonland