Jump to content

Featured Replies

Out : AJ  Howes

In : May* Billings (sub)

So that's 2 Talls up forward (only) as 3 unprovens is 1 too many

T-Mac can do the spare rucking in the backline which leaves JVR to do a few in the forward line

We can always throw T-Mac or Petty forward if we need some forward line marking power (in game) The swingmen

 

*Is May available?

Edited by Macca

 
1 hour ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

I’d prefer Hore over Howes. He moves pretty well, so he could take a small or tall as well. Disappointing we didn’t have him available to play on Greene this week!

I would rather have Grinter on Greene.

All I’ll say is play like the game against GWS and we’ll smash them. North is a similar outside biased team. 

Gawn will have a tougher opponent in Xerri and Larkey / Darling combo will test our KPDs a bit more. 

But we should dominate the contest and territory game.  

 
21 hours ago, M_9 said:

So we're back to JvR doing the back up ruck work?

Or maybe TMac and ? takes Darling.

Goodwin has said things have to change. I reckon JvR honing his forward craft by staying put is one of those things.

TMac is a great defender. Or forward. Tenth in the Bluey last year. But he ain't no ruckman. Neither is Petty.

JvR is pretty good in the ruck, but we need him forward.

I agree Disco should come in. Not sure who goes out. Should be Fritsch, but that won't happen.

Well, he did stuff all as a forward on Sunday

I actually dont think we have an edge in midfield. Their centre square bats deeper than ours. Sheezel, Powell, Simpkin, Ldu, Xerri. Luke Parker is a pretty handy big bodied 5th midfielder.    (They were 4th in centre clearamces last year). 

Where we sinply have to win is up forward.  Comben and Archer have played less than 30 games. Corr and Logge are not world beaters.  This is the game where JVR, Fritta or Pickett (#$@!)  kicks 4 or 5 and we win by 30. 

Truth is we are going to get plenty of decent looks, its up to our forwards to put up 100 points.  They had 100 points kicked against them 18 times last year. .  If we kick 10.14 under the roof against that defence I'm scared for the Demonland data servers. 


7 minutes ago, Jjrogan said:

If we kick 10.14 under the roof against that defence I'm scared for the Demonland data servers. 

Any goodwill from the supporters and even the media from the GWS game will be completely eroded if things go south on Sunday. 

And "Simon's sign off" with his glass of red won't be as overly positive as it was on Sunday night.

27 minutes ago, Jjrogan said:

I actually dont think we have an edge in midfield. Their centre square bats deeper than ours. Sheezel, Powell, Simpkin, Ldu, Xerri. Luke Parker is a pretty handy big bodied 5th midfielder.    (They were 4th in centre clearamces last year). 

Where we sinply have to win is up forward.  Comben and Archer have played less than 30 games. Corr and Logge are not world beaters.  This is the game where JVR, Fritta or Pickett (#$@!)  kicks 4 or 5 and we win by 30. 

Truth is we are going to get plenty of decent looks, its up to our forwards to put up 100 points.  They had 100 points kicked against them 18 times last year. .  If we kick 10.14 under the roof against that defence I'm scared for the Demonland data servers. 

Sounds like a job for... 🎩

Onion Ring Lol GIF by Justin Gammon

Edited by adonski

On 16/03/2025 at 21:08, dees189227 said:

It's a must win next week. No excuses

Turner is a very good mark & shot for goal. 

How many chances do we give fritsch? No scores today & only a few marks. 

Fritsch played much further up the ground - hardly going to knock a guy for marks when it’s those conditions and he’s playing further up the ground

 
On 16/03/2025 at 21:57, Slartibartfast said:

I know this will be howled down but TMac is too good to not have in the 22. If May comes back I’d be moving Petty forward. AJ was poor in the ruck against Brown and JvR is much better. Jeffo has no intensity and I’d prefer Turner and Petty to AJ and Jeffo. 
If Spargs is ready he’s a class above Hendo. 
Wont happen, but that’s my take. 

Can’t disagree, but let’s not forget it’s Johnson’s first game at this level & ideally you want Van Rooyen staying forward

 

agrre regarding McDonald…petty forward is the only solution to him consistently playing, but don’t think they’ll go down that path

2 hours ago, Macca said:

Out : AJ  Howes

In : May* Billings (sub)

So that's 2 Talls up forward (only) as 3 unprovens is 1 too many

T-Mac can do the spare rucking in the backline which leaves JVR to do a few in the forward line

We can always throw T-Mac or Petty forward if we need some forward line marking power (in game) The swingmen

 

*Is May available?

I very much doubt that May will play. Not as bad as Max's larynx injury (a '6-weeker') but I doubt they'll take risks.

A player at my local club incurred a similar injury. He was warned a subsequent knock could cause permanent damage to his voice box.


56 minutes ago, Jjrogan said:

I actually dont think we have an edge in midfield. Their centre square bats deeper than ours. Sheezel, Powell, Simpkin, Ldu, Xerri. Luke Parker is a pretty handy big bodied 5th midfielder.    (They were 4th in centre clearamces last year). 

Where we sinply have to win is up forward.  Comben and Archer have played less than 30 games. Corr and Logge are not world beaters.  This is the game where JVR, Fritta or Pickett (#$@!)  kicks 4 or 5 and we win by 30. 

Truth is we are going to get plenty of decent looks, its up to our forwards to put up 100 points.  They had 100 points kicked against them 18 times last year. .  If we kick 10.14 under the roof against that defence I'm scared for the Demonland data servers. 

Logue is out with a hamstring and Archer may miss due to the MRO.

Comben was very poor last week and North still struggle with team defence. We absolutely have to punish them when going inside 50.

My biggest worry is Petty on Larkey. I thought Petty looked suspect in one-on-ones last week. McDonald should handle Darling fine. Does Hore come in if he's fit to take Zuhaar?

I also thought we lowered our colours a fair bit in clearance last week. Need more out of Clarry and Trac.

Also it's Darling's 300th game if that means anything for North 

2 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Logue is out with a hamstring and Archer may miss due to the MRO.

Comben was very poor last week and North still struggle with team defence. We absolutely have to punish them when going inside 50.

My biggest worry is Petty on Larkey. I thought Petty looked suspect in one-on-ones last week. McDonald should handle Darling fine. Does Hore come in if he's fit to take Zuhaar?

I also thought we lowered our colours a fair bit in clearance last week. Need more out of Clarry and Trac.

Also it's Darling's 300th game if that means anything for North 

So they're potentially even weaker yep.   One of our first round KPF draft pick (pick a KPF any KPF)  has to dominate against a bunch of defensive misfits. 

Agree on the clearances but i think we may need to get used to it.   Our midfield is 4 years older from '21 now and many other midfields units match ours sadly (apart from Max). 

Re Larkey, youd think Lever iwould be aware of the Larkey risk with no May.  I reckon he will be rolling over to help Petty out as much as possible so its up to the rest of the backline to then cover for Lever.  We need to be switched on and not think this is an easy win, Clarkson is no rookie.  

On 16/03/2025 at 17:42, Phil C said:

JVR needs to stop running under the ball. He can have a spell if he keeps that up 😩

JVR should be running up to the ball, well before despatch and into some space. Turner, on the flanks, does this well.

I feel like we may have made Langford the sub due to the conditions suiting players like Henderson and Sharp more. 

I reckon Langford will be best 22 this week and one of Henderson or Sharp to be the sub this week.

If Turner comes in for AJ and JVR is back up ruck it would probably resut in Fritsch closer to goal?

 


3 hours ago, M_9 said:

I very much doubt that May will play. Not as bad as Max's larynx injury (a '6-weeker') but I doubt they'll take risks.

A player at my local club incurred a similar injury. He was warned a subsequent knock could cause permanent damage to his voice box.

Fair enough

Out: AJ,  Howes

In: Billings,  Laurie (sub)

 

B:       Bowey   T-Mac    Lever

HB:    Salem     Petty     Rivers

C:       Langdon  Oliver   Windsor

HF:     Fritsch     JVR      Langford

F:     Chandler   Jefferson   Henderson

R:        Gawn      Petracca    Viney

Int:      Sparrow  Lindsay  Billings  Sharp

Sub:    Laurie

Tom the [censored] Morris already reported this morning via SEN that Dees won’t risk May this week. 

Got a vibe we won’t see him until Geelong R4.

Injury report said Windsor had a heel infection and is on antibiotics.... hopefully he can get up for Sunday!


3 hours ago, M_9 said:

I very much doubt that May will play. Not as bad as Max's larynx injury (a '6-weeker') but I doubt they'll take risks.

A player at my local club incurred a similar injury. He was warned a subsequent knock could cause permanent damage to his voice box.

Lever probably advocating for him to play so he gets yelled at less.

Shame we're missing May against Larkey and most likely Ben King. 

Out: AJ (Susp) In: Disco
Out: Howes (dropped) In: Billings/Woey with Rivers going back and Langdon sliding inside
Out Langford (dropped) In: Billings/Woey/Laurie/K Brown

Real shame for AJ but actually could help us as Disco gives us something different to AJ/JVR who seemed to be doing the same role. Disco can also back up ruck against Darling, it doesn't have to be JVR, keep both as options. Pressure staying on the 3 key forwards is good. Can't chop and change them every week but they'll know they need to perform.

Howes has to go. Rivers the only option I'd consider down back unfortunately which means we need to take him from the midfield. But especially in dry Marvel conditions I think it's time to use the preseason plan on Langdon on ball and pick someone else to play the wing.

Langford didn't do anything wrong but I hate having talented young guys as subs for more than 1 week at a time. He's better served going back and getting 25+ touches on ball at Casey. Take your pick for the sub vest.

If Windsor is no good then we're in trouble, but either Howes stays in or Hore comes in.

From club talk/reports it sounds like Turner was due to play last week after being ruled out 48 hrs out to due illness. So he'll play.

Only changes I see barring injury. Fingers crossed for Windsor.

In: Turner

Out: AJ 

If Windsor misses as others have mentioned I think Billings comes in and Riv plays more off HB.

I don't like that JVR will have to compete with the monster Xerri. Hopefully its limited and Max can take on more Ruck contests this week (he was at 75% on Centre Ruck contests last week with AJ in).

Edited by Young Blood

 

Archer will miss. Feel he’s a bit unlucky, but I guess the thing that hurt him is he was quite late to the contest so probably did have another option

Edited by DistrACTION Jackson

B: Bowey     Tmac     Lever

HB: Rivers   Petty   Windsor 

C:  Langdon  Viney  Lindsey 

HF: Chandler  Jeffo  Sharp

F:     Fritsch   JVR  Henderson 

R: Gawn  Oliver Petracca 

I/C  Langford Disco Sparrow Salem

Sub: Laurie 

Doubt they’ll drop Langford 

Edited by Demongirl35


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 528 replies