Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'm really curious about what happened to Gawn in the final quarter? There was a 15 minute spell where AJ was taking all the ruck contests and Gawn simply wasn't on the ground. There was some early talk by the commentators about getting a bang on the nose but not a peep about Gawn's extended absence while they were going on and on about Callghan having an obviously scheduled rest.

Can anyone enlighten me? Had his nose opened up and they could get him on because of the blood rule, maybe?

Solid chance it tipped the game - he was the best on ground even though he missed that chunk of time and could surely have influenced some of the crucial ruck contests where we had only AJ available.

 
2 hours ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

To everyone having a crack at JVR, he was on Taylor who had almost no impact on the game. Time to learn modern footy

U are kidding are u saying our major forward was playing a defensive role against a defender,??? PAAARK ME IF THAT IS MODERN FOOTY ITS PAAARKED Hudson, Mc Kenna, et all would beg to disagree. FORWARDS ARE THERE TO KICK GOALS!  

1 minute ago, At Least I Saw a Flag said:

My only reservation is the level of foot skills among the team.

A few times we were 'on', but a miskick (usually overkicking) across the ground led to costly turnovers.

Yep, GWS outskilled us 

But we probably all knew that going into the game

But the script wasn't much different ... we kick into a crowded forward line and the opposition move the ball rapidly into an open forward line

It's why teams like the Pies have our measure

 
17 minutes ago, Macca said:

We were too top heavy up forward especially on a day not suited for high marking.  We should have had another late withdrawal and given Langford a full game (take your pick on a sub) 

I don’t agree, I thought there was very little about Langford’s game that indicated we would’ve been better off with him playing from the start.

The game got wetter than expected in the 3rd but otherwise wasn’t all that wet for large stints.

We needed someone with speed, forward craft and pressure, ideally not a tall but I thought Jeffo did better than a shorter player for the sake of it.

They were right not to rush Spargo again but hopefully he’s available soon. All the rest of the one paced options -  Langford, Laurie, Billings wouldn’t have helped us. If there was anyone to pick it was probably Kynan Brown, at least as sub. 

1 hour ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

We did not loose the game because of fitness, one less game that GW$, the kids, the umpires, yadda, yadda, yadda . . .

We lost because:

  • there was ZERO on-field leadership during the last 100 seconds of the game, and
  • the off-field catastrophy of 2024 most definitely, probably, cost us Houston.

So utterly *&%#ing Melbourne.

Why worry about missing out on Houston. If we had got him we wouldn’t have drafted XL. 


Just now, picket fence said:

FORWARDS ARE THERE TO KICK GOALS!  

Or bring the ball to the ground for our small brigade,  but it did not come in to him properly at all, 

52 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

My Fifteen year old daughter who's a Demon but never been a massive fan said, and I quote "I get it now, let's go every week" .

This makes me smile. 

I think second guessing about selection today is a bad idea. 

The guys we had out there had a crack and more of them did well than not. It sucks to lose a game of football this way but what can you do? Build on from this performance.

 
29 minutes ago, Macca said:

We were too top heavy up forward especially on a day not suited for high marking.  We should have had another late withdrawal and given Langford a full game (take your pick on a sub) 

If AJ stays in as the 2nd ruck I can't see a spot for Jefferson.  Nor did I think that Jefferson was particularly hard at the contest or chased with intent

Kicked a couple of handy goals but apart from that, he did very little

And JVR is not a proven KPF (yet) so to be effectively playing 3 rookie talls up forward is at least 1 too many.  Poor selections

We probably need to recruit in a KPF from elsewhere if we are looking for B+ or A grade

In the meantime, one of AJ or Jeffo plays but not both.  We could get away with it against teams like North but against the Pies, Lions, Sydney or GWS and the like? 

I don't think so

It's JVR & AJ for mine with Fritsch as the 3rd tall ... Turner or Jeffo as replacements if AJ doesn't fire (JVR can ruck for 5 minutes per quarter)

Petracca & Kozzy up forward so we end up medium/tall.  Melksham? 

A. J Handy and busted his guts, Jeffo is class and a natural forward with smarts, moving forward Jeffo is the one who needs games!!! Should play all games this season


1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

I don’t agree, I thought there was very little about Langford’s game that indicated we would’ve been better off with him playing from the start.

 

We were at least one runner short and the match was lost at the selection table.  

JVR, AJ, Jeffo & Fritsch in the one forward line on a day where rain was forecast?  

Being top heavy allowed the opposition to run the ball out of our forward line far too easily.  Our defensive forward line pressure just wasn't up to it

If you are going to go that tall in the forward line then fast corridor entries are needed so as to catch the opposition out.  But instead of kicking to 1 on 1's in the hot spot, the ball (once again) ends up being kicked to packs near the boundary line

 

Watching the replay 11:37 left in the first quarter. Dwayne Russell “It’s their home, but it’s not really their home. They live in a shed really. In fact they don’t get to be on this lounge room floor all that often”

Pretty sure he is just making things up as he goes and saying whatever weird stuff comes into his head. 

Edited by Bonkers

19 minutes ago, Demondan75 said:

Will AJ get looked at for the tackle on Brown?

I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a week. Brown got up and was fine by the looks of it. But being first game they might set the precedence unfortunately. Shouldn't be more then a free kick but they really come down hard on these careless tackles especially early in season to try to deter players (never seems to work much anyway).

1 minute ago, picket fence said:

A. J Handy and busted his guts, Jeffo is class and a natural forward with smarts, moving forward Jeffo is the one who needs games!!! Should play all games this season

The issue surrounding Jeffo's selection is the 2nd ruck duties

If AJ is needed in the ruck (if we don't want to use JVR) then can we play JVR, AJ & Jeffo every week?  

None of the 3 are proven forwards (although, JVR can make it to that level)

Just now, Roost it far said:

It made me happy. She’s excellent at reports as well. 

She’s only just today decided she likes footy, and you’re pencilling her in for reports??!

#CuttingSomeone’sGrassMuch?


7 minutes ago, picket fence said:

U are kidding are u saying our major forward was playing a defensive role against a defender,??? PAAARK ME IF THAT IS MODERN FOOTY ITS PAAARKED Hudson, Mc Kenna, et all would beg to disagree. FORWARDS ARE THERE TO KICK GOALS!  

Yes and no. A recent AFL term is "defensive forward". Honestly if you're helping your team kick goals or you're stopping the opposition doing that you've had a good day. And if a forward's efforts mean a top defender or defence bring about way less opposition scoring chains or inside 50s as well as being excused for not scoring his day could be lauded.

I think Adam Kingsleys post match interview should get a watch from a few of our “supporters” 

I haven’t watched the game yet but he thinks we are going to be a very good team - I think his assessment is probably more accurate than some of those who seem very glass half empty atm 

Yep really disappointed in a loss but seriously didn’t think we’d get that close having watched GWS live the week before 

Truth is we could put in a few stinkers and then you’d be entitled to be negative but not after today as this game was ours until the last minute 

Work to be done but a really decent effort from a team with more new blood than we’ve seen for a very long time 

 

4 minutes ago, Macca said:

  Our defensive forward line pressure just wasn't up to it

Agree with that, don’t agree swapping Jeffo for a slow player just because they’re shorter would’ve made a big impact.

Need Pickett, Spargo and Kolt back, just hard to fill gaps down 3 guys in one role 

54 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Something that cost us was not having someone on the goal line.  They got 3-4 scappy goal as a result - at least 2 from Cogniglio could have been stopped had we had someone behind the pack.

I was ropeable with those two goals. Both times he was unmarked. Three goals to cognilio. That's the game right there.

3 minutes ago, binman said:

I was ropeable with those two goals. Both times he was unmarked. Three goals to cognilio. That's the game right there.

They hurt, we were aghast that no one was on the goal line with the ball pinging around like it was. 


goodwin has just done a quick post-game ahead of 4.5 hours of coding

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1733798/simons-sign-off-round-1?videoId=1733798&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1742120670001

the change to his media persona is striking

definitely going down the reverend style of opening up in his coaching journey

 

Edited by whatwhat say what

Just now, DeeSpencer said:

Agree with that, don’t agree swapping Jeffo for a slow player

Swapping Jeffo for a slow player?  I didn't say that and besides which, who is slower than Jeffo anyway?  Jeffo is not exactly Gout Gout

We could have played Langford or Billings as another runner (or both if we wanted to match GWS' running ability)

Prior to the season there was hardly anyone here advocating playing Jeffo, JVR & AJ in the one team so I'm not sure why suddenly that can be a workable plan

Maybe down the track where the actual output from all 3 is more than adequate but right now?  It's like we're playing 1 or 2 short

 
3 hours ago, bobby1554 said:

Agree. The fluffed kicks, taking the wrong option, Johnson sprays his kick, GWS clean, untouched to Keeffe who hammers it over the goal umpires head. So typically Melbourne. Our skills are sub standard, we are a mile off it.

And this week's hyperbole award goes to...


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
    Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Shocked
      • Like
    • 251 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Like
    • 17 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 273 replies
    Demonland