Jump to content

Featured Replies

13 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

To make it all even, whatever a player earns needs to be included 100% in a teams cap.

If that means no 3rd party deals then so be it. We’re doing something similar with Trac’s YoPro deal. Just late to the party is all.

Absolutely no way that you can enforce it. That's why minor leagues gave up on salary caps years ago and adopted the points system.

Appears to work very well in my local league (Bellarine).

I can see where the AFL is headed if club spending is not reigned in.

The Premier League currently has no salary cap (they are trying to set one up). The NBA have no salary cap.

The wealthy dominate 

The AFL need to put strict rules in place.

Jack Bowes being paid his $1.6million over 4 years rather than one had he stayed at the Suns. Yeah, OK! 

Bailey Smith only getting paid the amount on the Club's books. Yeah, sure!

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
13 minutes ago, M_9 said:

The Premier League currently has no salary cap

It does have one in the sense that you're not allowed to spend more than you earn.

This is what has got Manchester City in trouble.

In simple terms the League is saying that the sponsorship fee paid by the Middle East owners is greater than what would be paid by an arms length sponsor.

(Of course the more powerful/popular the club the higher the justifiable sponsor fee. You could even argue a higher fee on the basis that the recipient club will use it to buy "name players" that will enhance your sponsorship. Clear as mud but perhaps clearer than F1 team spending caps.)

21 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

It does have one in the sense that you're not allowed to spend more than you earn.

This is what has got Manchester City in trouble.

In simple terms the League is saying that the sponsorship fee paid by the Middle East owners is greater than what would be paid by an arms length sponsor.

(Of course the more powerful/popular the club the higher the justifiable sponsor fee. You could even argue a higher fee on the basis that the recipient club will use it to buy "name players" that will enhance your sponsorship. Clear as mud but perhaps clearer than F1 team spending caps.)

that was part of it, Manchester City initiated proceedings in relation to the legality/enforcement of Associated Party Transactions. Funnily enough both sides claimed a 'victory' as such after it was over.

But they've gotten into trouble for a lot more than that (failure to provide accurate information, failure to comply with requests, breaching PSR, breaching FFP); will be fascinating to see how that case is dealt with and what the punishment will be.

Feel a bit sorry for some of the smaller clubs that don't have unlimited wealth to delay/obfuscate the proceedings. They all took their punishment and moved on.

 

 
1 hour ago, Adam The God said:

Judd as a Visy Executive. 🤦

I don’t think he was hired as an executive.

I do suspect they had him on ~300K per year to come into the office once or twice a week to play solitaire for an hour.


1 hour ago, jaydenh10 said:

do you really think anything will come out of this? its geelong at the end of the day, also interesting port adl has been thrown into this f them they deserve it aswell

“The AFL has concluded the audit and can confirm no rules were broken and no further action to be taken as it pertains to Geelong.
 

Completely unrelated to the audit, we will be making sweeping changes to the salary cap system effective from today.”

From the Cat's website

'...Last year [2023] with the Geelong Cats Foundation, the Club embarked on the most significant campaign in our history. Our Capital Campaign, Advancing the Way We Play, aims to raise $20m to support our future facilities, people and the broader Geelong region...'

The Costa group promptly stumped up $10m.

So there you have it.

GFC players are people and they're being supported. Nothing to see!

There once was a club dressed in blue,
Whose cap tricks were sneaky, it’s true.
With numbers they played,
Big contracts delayed,
Till the AFL said, “We see you!” 😆

 
1 hour ago, Go Ds said:

Hey! This is a family site! 😂😂😂

DT is related to which character?
A. Fox Mulder. 
B. Richard Nixon.

It’s never too early for politics. The truth is out there.

1 hour ago, Deepfreeze said:

I don’t think he was hired as an executive.

I do suspect they had him on ~300K per year to come into the office once or twice a week to play solitaire for an hour.

Wasn't his title Visy environment ambassador?  Between training sessions he'd rescue sea turtles and recycle cans


1 hour ago, DiscoStu17 said:

DT is related to which character?
A. Fox Mulder. 
B. Richard Nixon.

It’s never too early for politics. The truth is out there.

I've always FELT it is both.

  • 2 weeks later...
25 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

This is Just a complete farce. The AFL is so far from an even playing field.

Has the integrity of FIFA

They're really taking it seriously hey.

 

Absolutely wild for the AFL to hire someone from clubland and give them the responsibility of auditing the club you were accountable for.

That’d be like hiring Carl Williams to be the judge on his own case. 

Surely this is being reported inaccurately


12 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Absolutely wild for the AFL to hire someone from clubland and give them the responsibility of auditing the club you were accountable for.

That’d be like hiring Carl Williams to be the judge on his own case. 

Surely this is being reported inaccurately

On the roar and fox footy.

I don't understand Chris Scott is a very capable advertising executive.

1 hour ago, Brownie said:

This is Just a complete farce. The AFL is so far from an even playing field.

Has the integrity of FIFA

They're really taking it seriously hey.

 

Whenever an organisation investigates itself it will oft result in a dubious finding Brownie.

No different here i'm guessing

AFL under Vlad, Gil, and presumably Dil had a longstanding mantra - don’t open an investigation into something you don’t already know the answer to

It’s why Adrian Anderson got sent to Coventry for raising to spectre of ‘tanking’ 


Jeeelong being dodgy again??

Investigating itself…what a suprise. 
The AFL would never question the One City Club, too much to lose for that, even though Jeeelong’s salary “Cap” (doesn’t actually exist) must be at least 2-3 x higher than the majority of Clubs….

 

At least this has made the Media, will anyone have the balls to investigate it properly…

You reckon Gerard Wheatley will touch this? Josh Jenkins? and all the Geelong supporting journalists?

No [censored] way this will be all swept under the carpet!

In exactly the same manner of the Tyson Stengle Disco Fiasco.

Gets taken away by an ambo and there is nothing to see here!

Not that it will matter with the outcome i'm sure, but if everyone on D'land shares the Roar article with one or two mates it might get the algorithm going on the platforms you share it with such as messenger, X etc and it just might gather a bit of steam and head wind within general footy / sports circles.

There's no way it will go anywhere via the mainstream AFL media as noted above.

Unlikely but with a few extra clicks from a stack of D'Landers you never know!

Demonland Podcast LIVE @ 8:00PM with Jeff White
 
On 11/03/2025 at 11:26, jaydenh10 said:

do you really think anything will come out of this? its geelong at the end of the day, also interesting port adl has been thrown into this f them they deserve it aswell

It will be akin to how hard the AFL went re Maynard/Gus… ie. pizzweak. But there’s no farm, oops I mean harm in trying 😉 

Edited by Ghostwriter


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 120 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 35 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 299 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies