Jump to content

Featured Replies

At the risk of a voodoo doll coming my way I thought I would 'out' our hitherto esteemed training reporter now operating under the pseudonym
@Ghostwriter

 

image.png.c608350748f41d78bc038b2d213072cc.png

 

Of course it took 2 seconds to work who it really is.🙃

Edited by Lucifers Hero

 
3 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

At the risk of a voodoo doll coming my way I thought I would 'out' our hitherto esteemed training reporter now operating under the pseudonym
@Ghostwriter

 

image.png.c608350748f41d78bc038b2d213072cc.png

 

Of course it took 2 seconds to work who out it really is.🙃

I have no idea what you’re talking about, Lucifer’s Hero. You must be thinking of someone else, someone slightly deranged perhaps.

 

 

 

 

😜

9 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

I have no idea what you’re talking about, Lucifer’s Hero. You must be thinking of someone else, someone slightly deranged perhaps.

 

 

 

 

😜

Ah, but you know I have a very good 'spidey sense' and Sherlock Holmes type detection traits ... Nope I am not mistaken!

LOL!  It was the 'Interests' on your profile that confirmed my suspicion 🙃

 

At least you didn't post a voodoo doll with 'Luci' photo shopped onto it.🙃

Edited by Lucifers Hero

 
1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

 

 

At least you didn't post a voodoo doll with 'Luci' photo shopped onto it.🙃

The day is young, Luci. 😁
 

 

03088EDD-11AD-43D0-B954-C94D8880E600.thumb.jpeg.e668dbdce1244103e52124f5cb081d2d.jpeg

 

like I said, the day is young.

@Lucifers Hero 😉 

Edited by Ghostwriter

10 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

I have no idea what you’re talking about, Lucifer’s Hero. You must be thinking of someone else, someone slightly deranged perhaps.

 

 

 

 

😜

She’s not after you @Lucifers Hero, she’s come back from the dead to haunt DL.

im going to change my name to @Ghostbuster.


4 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

She’s not after you @Lucifers Hero, she’s come back from the dead to haunt DL.

im going to change my name to @Ghostbuster.

Love it!  Go for it! 👏

If I was a redhead I could change mine to 'Deranged'!

 

On 27/11/2024 at 07:40, demoncat said:

Fair points, but just on the relationship between Trac and his fans - I’m not saying I was personally effected by it

Moreso that his lack of attempts to display anything other than a cursory commitment to the club this year suggests that positive fan sentiment was not a priority for him, and some of the reporting that came out around his intentions of why he wanted to leave also suggests this 

Just like we can’t control whether he goes, we also can’t control if he stays, and I don’t think a few stray comments on a forum will be the difference for him, so let’s not get too caught up in it 🤷‍♂️

Like you have. My opinion.

 
15 hours ago, CHF said:

 

realist: I need a refill.

I need a refill. Very soon.  Depends how quick you want to drink,

Guess DH would be a bit peeved if I got my nephew (a Bulldog) to stop by training next Friday when he's driving us home from the airport.  Been a long time since I've been to training.

 

Oo!  I see a Ghostwriter has entered the conversation!  Excellent.

Edited by thirty-one


On 27/11/2024 at 12:02, buck_nekkid said:

Observations: what i see

Confirmation bias:  creating meaning from observations to fit my belief system or narrative.

Unless you ask him, anything beyond the observation is useless.

All of this Trac is unhappy/brand focused etc inference is without any basis.  

Are you suggesting that after observing a behaviour anything that follows is useless?

That's ridiculous.

I can read behaviour as well or poorly as the next person. Trac did not look happy much of the time (in Mansfield) He trained hard and well (another observation).

Speculation as to why is another thing. I have no idea why. 

I made an observation and reported it, I was not alone. He did smile with the kids. 

I believe you are just as guilty of confirmation bias as anyone else,  lighten up.

18 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Speculation as to why is another thing. I have no idea why. 

Perfect.  Your Observations were insightful, and no BS speculations.

not getting heavy, just sick of massive diversions from the great posts of trackwatchers  into narratives that are presented as facts, not even speculation.

I’m all good, and happy to to lighten up.

Bugger.. had I known it was at Myrtleford today I would have called in a sickie and made the trek down the highway with my young fella.

2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Love it!  Go for it! 👏

If I was a redhead I could change mine to 'Deranged'!

 

and if you previously WERE a redhead, you could change yours to DeRanga'd ;)


3 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

At the risk of a voodoo doll coming my way I thought I would 'out' our hitherto esteemed training reporter now operating under the pseudonym
@Ghostwriter

 

image.png.c608350748f41d78bc038b2d213072cc.png

 

Of course it took 2 seconds to work who it really is.🙃

One of my favourite songs from one of my all time favourite bands immediately came to mind:

 

If a further change of non de plume is forthcoming, may I humbly suggest the classic C & W tune ...

"Ghostwriter's In Disguise"  (Yippie-yi-o! Yippie-yi-yay!)

3 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

She’s not after you @Lucifers Hero, she’s come back from the dead to haunt DL.

im going to change my name to @Ghostbuster.

I will raise you one and change my name to Stay Puft :-) 

2 hours ago, ManDee said:

I believe you are just as guilty of confirmation bias as anyone else,  lighten up.

You can’t be guilty or not guilty of confirmation bias anymore than you can be guilty of falling for an optical illusion. It’s hard-wired into our brain, like all cognitive biases, and impacts all of us. Part of our evolution on the plains of Africa, designed to keep us safe by making us risk-averse.
 

Not so much on social media, and no, there couldn’t be sabre tooth tigers hiding in the grass at Gotch’s paddock. 

11 hours ago, thirty-one said:

Oo!  I see a Ghostwriter has entered the conversation!  Excellent.

In dis guys perhaps  but an excellent alternative view.

Take it or leave it, the readers choice,


13 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

The day is young, Luci. 😁
 

 

03088EDD-11AD-43D0-B954-C94D8880E600.thumb.jpeg.e668dbdce1244103e52124f5cb081d2d.jpeg

 

like I said, the day is young.

@Lucifers Hero 😉 

Ouch!  Ouch!

I take solace from the fact that 'Luci' is enclosed in a ❤️

12 hours ago, 640MD said:

I need a refill. Very soon.  Depends how quick you want to drink,

And you should only refill empty glasses,  if they have beer or vino in them they are not thirsty,

11 hours ago, bing181 said:

You can’t be guilty or not guilty of confirmation bias anymore than you can be guilty of falling for an optical illusion. It’s hard-wired into our brain, like all cognitive biases, and impacts all of us. Part of our evolution on the plains of Africa, designed to keep us safe by making us risk-averse.
 

Not so much on social media, and no, there couldn’t be sabre tooth tigers hiding in the grass at Gotch’s paddock. 

Really?

Few people are not guilty of confirmation bias in some areas.

We search for stories that support our beliefs and rail against those that do not.

We form first impressions of people (sometimes wrong).

I have an opinion of you and no doubt you of me, when I read your posts I will have a preconceived idea of what you are saying. We could both be wrong, are we not guilty of confirmation bias?

Funnily I did a google search asking can you be guilty of confirmation bias, it replied yes. I stopped there because it supported my case. 

I think the Dees will be great next season, you and I no doubt would agree. So all is not lost.

And I could be wrong 🙂

 
16 minutes ago, Viscount Cardwell said:

Any chance we could have a thread called Preseason Training not another Tracc thread like this one !

We could call it:

Preseason training- how are they Traccing?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

    • 309 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies