Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

wonder if Jimmy Toumpas is available?

Put last pick 9 was Sam W. 

 

 
8 minutes ago, Macca said:

Pffft

And my advice to you is to try and get a bit of joy out of the game and your team

You poor your misery out on others so what sort of reaction do you think you're going to get?  And learn how to talk with people not at them

Ridiculing your own supporters wins you no favours

And lose the anger

I think you're getting worked up for no reason mate. Where have I ridiculed supporters? It sounds like you've got some kind of resentment, maybe for someone else?

1 hour ago, Lil_red_fire_engine said:

I think pick 9 will debut before pick 5. 

9 looks taller than 5 to me.

More rounded also.

 
5 minutes ago, layzie said:

Yeah but isn't it a good thing if the club is doing what we want ie. getting higher picks?

Sure, but we shouldn't be only thinking of the draft.


Just note that whilst I’m a big supporter of JT, low draft picks does not guarantee success.  Getting 5 & 9 should add two high quality youngsters.  It was true for 2021, and in the future , you need the combination of drafting 1st round draftees, wise trades, attracting the right players from other clubs and development of others within the group.  

3 minutes ago, layzie said:

Yeah but isn't it a good thing if the club is doing what we want ie. getting higher picks?

There's people here who can't get any joy out of 2021 flag because apparently, the GF wasn't played at the MCG

Just miserable types and they've all found each on the internet.  Affirmation (of sorts)

Outside of the net, who would put up with their miserable utterings?  

The strange thing is that the miserable types have insanely high expectations.  That probably explains why they whinge so much

Apparently Pick 9 weighs more than Pick 5, but we can't tell anyone (and won't know anyway).

 
13 minutes ago, Bowserpower said:

I think you're getting worked up for no reason mate. Where have I ridiculed supporters? It sounds like you've got some kind of resentment, maybe for someone else?

No, nothing like that

What is true is you get easily triggered by any sort of optimism

So instead of embracing picks 5 & 9 as a great triumph (it is) all you want to do is reference the other issues the club might have

Just enjoy the moment like most others are

17 minutes ago, Bowserpower said:

Sure, but we shouldn't be only thinking of the draft.

I might be cynical cyril here but I think that we actually should be focussing mostly on the draft this year. The trade period is as slow as a wet week and there isn't much worth a pinch of poop.

Not interested in using it for Houston either, that feels like one of those hot days where 5 people are fighting it out for the last ice cream in the milk bar. 

Edited by layzie


2 minutes ago, layzie said:

I might be cynical cyril here but I think that we actually should be focussing mostly on the draft this year. The trade period is as slow as a wet week and there isn't much worth a pinch of poop.

Not interested in using it for Houston either, that feels like one of those hot days where 5 people are fighting it out for the last ice cream in the milk bar. 

2024 as a season is done with and it's time to look ahead with regards to list management and the draft

The club review will hopefully result in creating a clear pathway forward but we might see a few personnel changes with a few off-field positions

As always, we are just mere onlookers speculating on what we think might happen

Just a question on the likely top 10 picks from all the phantom drafts

How many of the 10 are not midfielders? (disregarding the F/S and Academy picks) 

I ask the question because can it be assumed that we will pick the best talent available with our 2 picks ... and are they by default, midfielders? 

A big no to Harry Armstrong.

Reminds me too much of Sam Weideman and tends to lack intensity at times.

If you're wanting key forward, go after Jobe Shanahan.. kid is an absolute beast.

Edited by dazzledavey36

  • Author
7 minutes ago, Macca said:

Just a question on the likely top 10 picks from all the phantom drafts

How many of the 10 are not midfielders? (disregarding the F/S and Academy picks) 

I ask the question because can it be assumed that we will pick the best talent available with our 2 picks ... and are they by default, midfielders? 

Armstrong (key fwd)

Tauru aka the Flying Viking (key def) are the two who appear in some top 10s


2 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Yes agree it’s a reminder of the Mahoney days. Good smart trading of picks to move up the order.   No complaints.  Let’s JT weave some magic.  
 

Just to be clear, the call out that was frustrating was the recruitment of players like Schache (and his extension), McAdam and Billings.  The extension for Laurie for a further 2 years was highly questionable. 

Schache was cover for Weideman, or a straight swap if you like, I assume he wasn't on a million a year, McAdam was not getting a regular game at the Crows and Billings had been sidelined also, a new full pre season after an end of year review will do them no harm. Laurie just needs consistency, issue was the yo yo ing. 

3 minutes ago, adonski said:

Armstrong (key fwd)

Tauru aka the Flying Viking (key def) are the two who appear in some top 10s

Ok thanks

So next question is when are Armstong or Tauru likely to be picked? 

Top 5?  6-10?  3-7? 

If you don't have a good idea, don't worry, as I'm just trying to figure out whether we are all-in on 2 midfielders or maybe making a play for Armstrong or Tauru? 

  • Author
3 minutes ago, Macca said:

Ok thanks

So next question is when are Armstong or Tauru likely to be picked? 

Top 5?  6-10?  3-7? 

If you don't have a good idea, don't worry, as I'm just trying to figure out whether we are all-in on 2 midfielders or maybe making a play for Armstrong or Tauru? 

Don't think anyone can provide a good answer yet, although there have been links between Norf's pick 2 & Tauru

Just now, adonski said:

Don't think anyone can provide a good answer yet, although there have been links between Norf's pick 2 & Tauru

Ok, the word is that North have got enough midfielders?  So that makes sense

If that happens, pick 5 gets us the choice of the best 4 available Mids 

Pick 9 gives us one of the best 8 (or so) midfielders or do we take the punt on Armstrong? 

One thing is for sure is that the club knows who we are going after with a plan B and a plan C as part of the overall plan

The first part of the plan was getting pick 9 off the Bombers


26 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

A big no to Harry Armstrong.

Reminds me too much of Sam Weideman and tends to lack intensity at times.

If you're wanting key forward, go after Jobe Shanahan.. kid is an absolute beast.

I agree with that.  Shanahan reminds me of Curnow 

1 hour ago, Macca said:

I never quite understood what you were on about with that stuff anyway

Back then I was putting a positive slant on the upcoming season and I need a walk in the sun?  

Were you projecting? 

I can’t remember, the season is dead to me 

7 minutes ago, Macca said:

Ok thanks

So next question is when are Armstong or Tauru likely to be picked? 

Top 5?  6-10?  3-7? 

If you don't have a good idea, don't worry, as I'm just trying to figure out whether we are all-in on 2 midfielders or maybe making a play for Armstrong or Tauru? 

Yeah it's interesting to know what our strategy is eg is it:

A. "We have our eye specifically on someone who will be there at 9-15" (as we seemed keen on 13).  Maybe - but this draft seems very unpredictable so would be hard to be sure of anything.

B. "This draft has so much talent - to have 2 picks in the top 10 means we could get 2 stars"

C. "We don't have a set plan but top picks are a premium - we can use them like that, slide 9 back for another in the second round or even package them for 2 and another first round".

D. Something else again

 

I suspect its mostly C and A - we probably have about 15 different scenarios war gamed out!

 

 
Just now, Roost it far said:

I can’t remember, the season is dead to me 

Same here, Roost it

The players & coaching staff will only be looking at tomorrow and they won't be looking back 

Need a decent run with injuries in so far as having our best players available

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 152 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies