Jump to content

Featured Replies

Just now, Moonshadow said:

Surely Richards will get weeks for that haymaker from behind

He could have done some serious damage if he got him harder

 
6 minutes ago, BoBo said:

They’re the 17th youngest list and 16th most inexperienced for games.

 

3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Lesson to be learnt here @DeeSpencer..

Do your research. 

I did. That’s list age. It’s a very young list  with mostly kids at Box Hill. 

Their actual team tonight:

Average age is 25 6 months.

Average games is 100.

6 players under 50.

Port last night. 25.10, 107, 6 under 50. No one was getting excited for the young Power (even before the result).

For most of this year we had very similar numbers and often more guys under 50 games.

 
1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

 

I did. That’s list age. It’s a very young list  with mostly kids at Box Hill. 

Their actual team tonight:

Average age is 25 6 months.

Average games is 100.

6 players under 50.

Port last night. 25.10, 107, 6 under 50. No one was getting excited for the young Power (even before the result).

For most of this year we had very similar numbers and often more guys under 50 games.

Yeah fair point!

Any chance of a decent final?

Sat arvo game is the best chance of a close one


9 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

I suspect @DeeSpencer is talking about the 23 playing, not the entire list.

The side currently playing has an average age of 25y 6m (Dogs are 26y 8m) and average games played of 107.6 (Dogs are 130.8).

They're not that far off the same age/experience as Port last night (25y 10m and 107 games).

I suspect they're the youngest side playing finals (perhaps GWS will be similar?) but they're nothing like some of the sides we saw in Round 24 (e.g. Fremantle was 24y 10m, Adelaide 24y 5m, GC was 24y 10m, North was 24y 9m). 

If it's the 23 playing then yes that makes more sense.

JUH having a laugh in the middle with the Hawks players after the siren. 
 

Not a good look given how disappointing he was. Too early to call him overhyped? 

 

When do we get a thread about Luke as head of footy?

The closeness Mitchell has with his players looks special. Reminds me of Goody with our group in 2021.


3 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

 

I did. That’s list age. It’s a very young list  with mostly kids at Box Hill. 

Their actual team tonight:

Average age is 25 6 months.

Average games is 100.

6 players under 50.

Port last night. 25.10, 107, 6 under 50. No one was getting excited for the young Power (even before the result).

For most of this year we had very similar numbers and often more guys under 50 games.

Yes had you said the current 23 then it would make sense.

They're in good hands for the next few years. 

Gunston and Bruest chalk up a lot of the games and experience on tonight. Both of them only played a half pretty much as they subbed each other on and off.

This is a team that won without two of their younger stars in CJ and Will Day on top of Watson and Dear combing for 7 goals in total. Not bad for a couple of first year players.

3 minutes ago, Sir Windsor said:

JUH having a laugh in the middle with the Hawks players after the siren. 
 

Not a good look given how disappointing he was. Too early to call him overhyped? 

Screenshot_20240906_223117_AFL.thumb.jpg.e118d633ec08313b8179744d04089c02.jpg

10 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

It's how you win games against teams that can't defend. We beat Geelong and Hawthorn, you know. 

Yes we did beat them early in the year.

But you’re saying that Port and Dogs can’t defend. Even so, they both beat us. 


7 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

When do we get a thread about Luke as head of footy?

Midfield coach perhaps?

Surely Watson and Dear convince everyone that the draft is the only way to go with pick 5. 
Couple of first year blokes with a very solid impact

8 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

When do we get a thread about Luke as head of footy?

Wait for the Lions to lose tomorrow, and we'll have a triumvirate of footy in charge of the department

 

5 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Makes me sick to see Hawks and Geelong win comfortably in September again

Look on the bright side, we're spared a boringly repetitive dogs v port semi final where the flaky winner is guaranteed cannon fodder in a prelim. Maybe the Hawks will provide something different and interesting for a few weeks, even if it is irritating that they're becoming successful again.

And the Cats will at least provide the MCG with a prelim final. (Im outta ideas here)

Edited by John Demonic


7 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Yes had you said the current 23 then it would make sense.

They're in good hands for the next few years. 

Gunston and Bruest chalk up a lot of the games and experience on tonight. Both of them only played a half pretty much as they subbed each other on and off.

This is a team that won without two of their younger stars in CJ and Will Day on top of Watson and Dear combing for 7 goals in total. Not bad for a couple of first year players.

I’m not sure CJ is a star, fun player when you’re rebuilding but be butchers it. To do this without Day is impressive, but he’s another mid who’s done his apprenticeship.

I wonder if there’s something to having experience down back (although with Amon and Impey having more legs than our boys), a midfield that’s coming in to prime age/games played and mostly a young forward line.

Chol plays like he’s 21, Dear plays like he’s 24 (crazy find), the smalls have the pace and exuberance of youth whilst also having big tanks. Moore gets his praise but MacDonald is so underrated, like a younger better ANB 

 
11 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Surely Watson and Dear convince everyone that the draft is the only way to go with pick 5. 
Couple of first year blokes with a very solid impact

You're not going to get this every year at every finals.

But what it does show is that you've got to continue to stock up on elite young talent when the opportunity presents itself and as it stands it does with us this year.

I do hope Matthew Jefferson was watching Calsher Dear tonight. No reason why he can't come on next year and make a sudden impact for the year.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 195 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies