Jump to content

Featured Replies

IMV, AFL has shifted to an elite sport, and with that, the coaching sphere has changed.

If you look at the EPL, the manager will bring the philosophy and how they want to play, but it won't be up to the manager to coach it as such. The first team coach will do that. In the AFL, it's the line coaches and strategy coach that works out how to play that way within the framework of the coach's philosophy.

Goody has definitely tweaked his philosophy. Everything flows from contest because that's the game, but in possession we have different gears. Either go immediately (we are one of the faster transition teams in the comp) or chip and maintain possession to pull apart the opposition's zonal structure.

Our model is not entirely unique to us, we're blending other's styles, but I maintain we want to use our pressure and stoppage strength to give a point of difference. The more good ball users we can get behind the ball and across half forward, the better we'll be.

I've compared our new style to the way Slot has changed Liverpool. Klopp, the previous manager, was 100% all the time, think Collingwood. No real variance to their game.

Ultimately, if the style can't be implemented it falls on the shoulders of the head coach, but the ability to implement really flows from how good the messaging is across the entire coaching team.

With the shifting philosophy, the list has had to shift too. I think we're not that far off, but the guys that are letting us down now are the forwards and mids, and their inability to finish the hard work of the rest of the team.

Edited by Adam The God

 
27 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

IMV, AFL has shifted to an elite sport, and with that, the coaching sphere has changed.

If you look at the EPL, the manager will bring the philosophy and how they want to play, but it won't be up to the manager to coach it as such. The first team coach will do that. In the AFL, it's the line coaches and strategy coach that works out how to play that way within the framework of the coaches philosophy.

Goody has definitely tweaked his philosophy. Everything flows from contest because that's the game, but in possession we have different gears. Either go immediately (we are one of the faster transition teams in the comp) or chip and maintain possession to pull apart the opposition's zonal structure.

Our model is not entirely unique to us, we're blending other's styles, but I maintain we want to use our pressure and stoppage strength to give a point of difference. The more good ball users we can get behind the ball and across half forward, the better we'll be.

I've compared our new style to the way Slot has changed Liverpool. Klopp, the previous manager, was 100% all the time, think Collingwood. No real variance to their game.

Ultimately, if the style can't be implemented it falls on the shoulders of the head coach, but the ability to implement really flows from how good the messaging is across the entire coaching team.

With the shifting philosophy, the list has had to shift too. I think we're not that far off, but the guys that are letting us down now are the forwards and mids, and their inability to finish the hard work of the rest of the team.

Can we at least have collingwoods system and players that adhere to it

I can easily see their system

I cannot see ours and I wonder if we have one other than kick it to max down the line.

If we have one and the players can't won't adhere to it then we need new players in my view

2 minutes ago, jackaub said:

Can we at least have collingwoods system and players that adhere to it

I can easily see their system

I cannot see ours and I wonder if we have one other than kick it to max down the line.

If we have one and the players can't won't adhere to it then we need new players in my view

We do need more talent, all sides do, but we need players who can kick straight and take their chances forward of centre. That simple IMO.

 
47 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

We do need more talent, all sides do, but we need players who can kick straight and take their chances forward of centre. That simple IMO.

That’s a cop out for mine, we have plenty of talent, Collingwood and the Bulldogs have their fair share of average players that thrive in a good system and not all of their players are elite kicks.

4 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

That’s a cop out for mine, we have plenty of talent, Collingwood and the Bulldogs have their fair share of average players that thrive in a good system and not all of their players are elite kicks.

I didn't say we needed more talent to implement the system. I just said we needed more talent as all teams do...

It would be nice to get some generational type father sons though.


Just now, Adam The God said:

I didn't say we needed more talent to implement the system. I just said we needed more talent as all teams do...

It would be nice to get some generational type father sons though.

No doubt all teams would love more talent, footy is interesting game had we gotten Houston we potentially say goodbye to one of Langford or X. But as it stand we have a lot of talent on this list. Some completely out of form, some past their past, some up and coming and some at the peak of their powers. We need to stop looking for excuses, so far this year we’ve had thrown up injuries, new gameplan, off field issues and as recently as a week or two ago @Disco InTurno suggested this year was a gap year of sorts as we transition our gameplan. I was of the opinion as I think most people were when our draw come out that we were finals bound. Goody needs to go along with one or two of favourite players in order to move on. There’s a stale feeling about the place.

1 hour ago, jackaub said:

Can we at least have collingwoods system and players that adhere to it

I can easily see their system

I cannot see ours and I wonder if we have one other than kick it to max down the line.

If we have one and the players can't won't adhere to it then we need new players in my view

If you actually think our system is kick it long down the line to Max you haven’t been watching us or you don’t know what you’re watching

1 hour ago, Pennant St Dee said:

If you actually think our system is kick it long down the line to Max you haven’t been watching us or you don’t know what you’re watching

Ok let's count how many times we do it today

Pls a simple statement of our system would assist me

 
11 minutes ago, jackaub said:

Ok let's count how many times we do it today

Pls a simple statement of our system would assist me

Seriously dudereham, we don’t use that anywhere like what we used to. I feel today will be the day it all comes together. Can see us really dominating large parts of today. Our goal kicking will decide whether we win by 8 or 40.

6 hours ago, beelzebub said:

I'm actually starting to think Goodwin is simply in the wrong role.

He obviously has a good connection with the players but as a coach, I.e the bloke who's supposed to coordinate the play etc I don't rate him.

I've fully believed for some time it was Ooze who was the real catalyst for our winning. He's gone, we're floundering.

But the connection of players and Goody remains.

I think he might simply be doing the wrong job.

Mentoring might be more his fit.

Tend to agree.

Goody would be a brilliant Football Department Manager…

It has been a steady decline since Burgess and Yze left the building


3 hours ago, jackaub said:

Ok let's count how many times we do it today

Pls a simple statement of our system would assist me

Did you see it, handball chains, hitting the 45s, moving the ball quickly which has been on show for 5 weeks. Playing at different speeds slow chipping when needed to work through zones, then going quicker honouring the run with handball as opposed to bombing it into 50 to create forward stoppage, which was the 21-24 model. And continued handball to work it into space. Not to mention we bring a lot more pressure across the ground That’s not to say we don’t still have a contested side but we are far more balanced at the stoppages than we were previously

3 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Seriously dudereham, we don’t use that anywhere like what we used to. I feel today will be the day it all comes together. Can see us really dominating large parts of today. Our goal kicking will decide whether we win by 8 or 40.

Well, that was a good pick!!!

8 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

Well, that was a good pick!!!

I actually thought that win was coming last week. Happy to be proven correct even if it was a little roll of the confidence dice!!

11 hours ago, beelzebub said:

I've fully believed for some time it was Ooze who was the real catalyst for our winning. He's gone, we're floundering.

Question - do you credit Yze with our midfield performance in 2022 and 2023 as well?


Lost at selection!

time to go Goody. No selection integrity!

Oh, did we win this week?

I’ll save this post for later then

11 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Question - do you credit Yze with our midfield performance in 2022 and 2023 as well?

Valid ...

I have wondered.

I do wonder what he was tasked to do....

Did 21 actually change some dynamics within the club ?

All a curiosity for sure

One hot day does not make a Summer

15 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Question - do you credit Yze with our midfield performance in 2022 and 2023 as well?

If Goodwin wasn't responsible for 2021, he's not responsible for 24 or 25 either. Can't have it both ways.

Giving no credit for success but all the blame for failure is of course classic confirmation bias.

1 minute ago, bing181 said:

If Goodwin wasn't responsible for 2021, he's not responsible for 24 or 25 either. Can't have it both ways.

Giving no credit for success but all the blame for failure is of course classic confirmation bias.

Actually you can..

Depends who was doing what, who tasked with what ?

Not your brightest post mate


26 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Question - do you credit Yze with our midfield performance in 2022 and 2023 as well?

Great call. And what about all the tactical innovations before Yze joined us (his first year was 2021)?

Over the last decade we have worked out way through at least three distinct phases of "scoring strategy":

  1. Strategy designed to reduce opposition shot conversion percentage, while providing us extra numbers around the contest. (Opposition potentially gets quantity but low quality).(Think Diamond Defence era).

  2. After that we played a "centre at all costs" strategy, where we gave the ball off to someone 30 m out straight in front every time, to maximise accuracy/conversion (shot quality not quantity)

  3. From there we moved to the extreme forward press with repeat entries (quantity not quality). That won us a flag and got us top 4 for 3 years in a row.

On top of that we have had a constantly evolving tactics around "defence, contest, and transition" that has supported the scoring strategy.

This has included various defensive zone structures including Diamond Defence, and others including where we push a player up to contest, leave a man free out the back and back ourselves to work back faster than opposition transitiona.

We've had contested ball tactics that have utilised +1 at the contest and -1 at the contest.

We've used kick it long to Max and force a stoppage tactics. We've had play on at all cost tactics too. Now we use 45 degree cut out passes, short chips to retain possession. We use forward handballs.

I'm sure Goodwin has had substantial support from his assistant coaches with these innovations and changes over the years. But my bet is we would find that he is an innovative tactical thinker, who uses sport science and data/stats to drive plans, and that even though he might not be the guy coming up with every plan, he is the guy leading those plans and encouraging his team to do that analysis and make those changes.

This doesn't mean I don't think he will have an effective shelf life as coach, that he can get stale, or lose the players. It doesn't mean I don't think he is under significant pressure.

But I do think,from a reasonable outside perspective, he has runs on the board (including 3 successive top 4 finishes with a flag) that means he should be allowed to see through his transition to a new strategy and game plan, unless something has gone wrong at the relationship level.

Edited by deanox

1 hour ago, bing181 said:

If Goodwin wasn't responsible for 2021, he's not responsible for 24 or 25 either. Can't have it both ways.

Giving no credit for success but all the blame for failure is of course classic confirmation bias.

Yes you can. It's the reason Domonland exists.

13 hours ago, beelzebub said:

I'm actually starting to think Goodwin is simply in the wrong role.

He obviously has a good connection with the players but as a coach, I.e the bloke who's supposed to coordinate the play etc I don't rate him.

I've fully believed for some time it was Ooze who was the real catalyst for our winning. He's gone, we're floundering.

But the connection of players and Goody remains.

I think he might simply be doing the wrong job.

Mentoring might be more his fit.

After seeing Goodys coaching performance today & actually in the last few games maybe time to retract your statement ?

 
9 hours ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

No doubt all teams would love more talent, footy is interesting game had we gotten Houston we potentially say goodbye to one of Langford or X. But as it stand we have a lot of talent on this list. Some completely out of form, some past their past, some up and coming and some at the peak of their powers. We need to stop looking for excuses, so far this year we’ve had thrown up injuries, new gameplan, off field issues and as recently as a week or two ago @Disco InTurno suggested this year was a gap year of sorts as we transition our gameplan. I was of the opinion as I think most people were when our draw come out that we were finals bound. Goody needs to go along with one or two of favourite players in order to move on. There’s a stale feeling about the place.

🤷

8 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Seriously dudereham, we don’t use that anywhere like what we used to. I feel today will be the day it all comes together. Can see us really dominating large parts of today. Our goal kicking will decide whether we win by 8 or 40.

Wow .... Early call, impressive call.

I was hoping we'd stay with 'em but a win never entered my mind till the last 5mins.
Seen too many teams roll over us of late when the whips start cracking.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 139 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 423 replies