Jump to content

Featured Replies

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

 
On 13/01/2024 at 09:14, daisycutter said:

i think it's more to do with aflw than afl.  there's your reason.

But it shouldn’t be more to do with the AFLW. Why would/should it be? It’s not like the no white shorts ruling - which only applies to the AFLW - a decision that was made because research was showing that having to wear white shorts was stopping many young girls from continuing to play footy once they reached early teens. There’s no reason for the W comp to be any different to the M in terms of disclosing a player’s weight. 

14 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

Or old woman!!!! 🤣

Edited by WalkingCivilWar
Changed ‘women’ to ‘woman’ since there’s only one old woman shouting at clouds that I know of 😁

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

Don’t get me started on cloud seeding, Chem trails etc.

It triggers me.


2 hours ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

What would you rather shout at. The clouds or your missus. Clouds are much safer.

3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

But it shouldn’t be more to do with the AFLW. Why would/should it be? It’s not like the no white shorts ruling - which only applies to the AFLW - a decision that was made because research was showing that having to wear white shorts was stopping many young girls from continuing to play footy once they reached early teens. There’s no reason for the W comp to be any different to the M in terms of disclosing a player’s weight. 

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

2 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

Do they measure people or do the players just tell (whoever) what their height is?  

Height person:  What height are you?

Player:  I'm 190 centimeters

HP : Are you sure, you don't look that tall?

Player:  You're not allowed to talk to me like that

HP:  You're right, sorry.  See you later, titch!  Next!!

Edited by Macca

 
2 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

That’s ridiculous. Publish everyone’s weight or no one’s weight. I can’t imagine there’d be female athletes who’re against having their weight known. If they are, maybe they’re in the wrong profession. 🤷‍♀️ 

19 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That’s ridiculous. Publish everyone’s weight or no one’s weight. I can’t imagine there’d be female athletes who’re against having their weight known. If they are, maybe they’re in the wrong profession. 🤷‍♀️ 

well, i now won't be able to say "who's that big sheila in the ruck" 

and presumably "who's that big fella in the ruck".  😲

Edited by daisycutter


1 hour ago, Macca said:

Do they measure people or do the players just tell (whoever) what their height is?  

Height person:  What height are you?

Player:  I'm 190 centimeters

HP : Are you sure, you don't look that tall?

Player:  You're not allowed to talk to me like that

HP:  You're right, sorry.  See you later, titch!  Next!!

Every players height and weight gets done from development through seniors and done every season 

6 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Every players height and weight gets done from development through seniors and done every season 

I was being flippant, PSD

Although, I do question the actual height of a few players but I won't name names!

I just do not understand how reporting weight would be offensive..

we are talking about weight due to muscle mass, not obese fat.. (mostly)

what is  next, we do not report weight in boxing.?

 

Next will be height as short players may feel offended. [censored].


44 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

Next will be height as short players may feel offended. [censored].

Stop offending people…..

So... can we say that player x is as wide as they are high?😁

Only if his surname is "Choad"

Weird move by AFL, think there are more pressing issues. Seems like a political correctness agenda. Might make match ups a little tricker for opposition analysts with access to oppositions heights only. Might have to get WikiLeaks onto this stuff.

According to Ch7 the aFL have made the move so that players won’t be “Fat Shamed”, what an absolute load of garbage. Oohh I am so Woke I can’t stand up straight. Lol.!!!!


this is what is bizarre

reporting of weight is not about fat shaming in elite sport...

mostly it is interesting for the young new rookies...

is new player x  90+kg's,  ooh they may be able to play 1st year.

is player x 70kg,  Ok, they are a few years away, they need to PUT ON A FEW KG'S...

strength/muscle bulk mass vs agility/speed debate.... nothing to do with fat, because elite players are not fat.

13 hours ago, picket fence said:

So... can we say that player x is as wide as they are high?😁

 

7 hours ago, Checker Mate said:

Only if his surname is "Choad"

😅

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

The fat shaming was the old skin folds test, you would come off your break and see the callipers and you knew your were in trouble.  Then coming back after Christmas always 3-4km time trail and skin fold test.

 
1 hour ago, drdrake said:

The fat shaming was the old skin folds test, you would come off your break and see the callipers and you knew your were in trouble.  Then coming back after Christmas always 3-4km time trail and skin fold test.

The dreaded callipers. 😱
One afternoon last week Fritta was at his mum’s. She said, “Are you staying for dinner, Bayles?” He said, “Depends on what you’re cooking, I’ve got a fat-pinch and a 2k-er tomorrow.” She was cooking a creamy pasta dish. He didn’t stay for dinner. 😁


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Shocked
    • 32 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thumb Down
    • 17 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 21 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Like
    • 270 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

      • Haha
    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies