Jump to content

Featured Replies

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

 
On 13/01/2024 at 09:14, daisycutter said:

i think it's more to do with aflw than afl.  there's your reason.

But it shouldn’t be more to do with the AFLW. Why would/should it be? It’s not like the no white shorts ruling - which only applies to the AFLW - a decision that was made because research was showing that having to wear white shorts was stopping many young girls from continuing to play footy once they reached early teens. There’s no reason for the W comp to be any different to the M in terms of disclosing a player’s weight. 

14 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

Or old woman!!!! 🤣

Edited by WalkingCivilWar
Changed ‘women’ to ‘woman’ since there’s only one old woman shouting at clouds that I know of 😁

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

Don’t get me started on cloud seeding, Chem trails etc.

It triggers me.


2 hours ago, Demonstone said:

It's hilarious how this very minor issue has triggered the "Old man shouting at clouds" brigade.  

What would you rather shout at. The clouds or your missus. Clouds are much safer.

3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

But it shouldn’t be more to do with the AFLW. Why would/should it be? It’s not like the no white shorts ruling - which only applies to the AFLW - a decision that was made because research was showing that having to wear white shorts was stopping many young girls from continuing to play footy once they reached early teens. There’s no reason for the W comp to be any different to the M in terms of disclosing a player’s weight. 

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

2 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

Do they measure people or do the players just tell (whoever) what their height is?  

Height person:  What height are you?

Player:  I'm 190 centimeters

HP : Are you sure, you don't look that tall?

Player:  You're not allowed to talk to me like that

HP:  You're right, sorry.  See you later, titch!  Next!!

Edited by Macca

 
2 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

It happens in the WAFL weekly footy Budget only the male listed players across all grades have their weight published the female players don’t it’s height only 

That’s ridiculous. Publish everyone’s weight or no one’s weight. I can’t imagine there’d be female athletes who’re against having their weight known. If they are, maybe they’re in the wrong profession. 🤷‍♀️ 

19 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

That’s ridiculous. Publish everyone’s weight or no one’s weight. I can’t imagine there’d be female athletes who’re against having their weight known. If they are, maybe they’re in the wrong profession. 🤷‍♀️ 

well, i now won't be able to say "who's that big sheila in the ruck" 

and presumably "who's that big fella in the ruck".  😲

Edited by daisycutter


1 hour ago, Macca said:

Do they measure people or do the players just tell (whoever) what their height is?  

Height person:  What height are you?

Player:  I'm 190 centimeters

HP : Are you sure, you don't look that tall?

Player:  You're not allowed to talk to me like that

HP:  You're right, sorry.  See you later, titch!  Next!!

Every players height and weight gets done from development through seniors and done every season 

6 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Every players height and weight gets done from development through seniors and done every season 

I was being flippant, PSD

Although, I do question the actual height of a few players but I won't name names!

I just do not understand how reporting weight would be offensive..

we are talking about weight due to muscle mass, not obese fat.. (mostly)

what is  next, we do not report weight in boxing.?

 

Next will be height as short players may feel offended. [censored].


44 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

Next will be height as short players may feel offended. [censored].

Stop offending people…..

So... can we say that player x is as wide as they are high?😁

Only if his surname is "Choad"

Weird move by AFL, think there are more pressing issues. Seems like a political correctness agenda. Might make match ups a little tricker for opposition analysts with access to oppositions heights only. Might have to get WikiLeaks onto this stuff.

According to Ch7 the aFL have made the move so that players won’t be “Fat Shamed”, what an absolute load of garbage. Oohh I am so Woke I can’t stand up straight. Lol.!!!!


this is what is bizarre

reporting of weight is not about fat shaming in elite sport...

mostly it is interesting for the young new rookies...

is new player x  90+kg's,  ooh they may be able to play 1st year.

is player x 70kg,  Ok, they are a few years away, they need to PUT ON A FEW KG'S...

strength/muscle bulk mass vs agility/speed debate.... nothing to do with fat, because elite players are not fat.

13 hours ago, picket fence said:

So... can we say that player x is as wide as they are high?😁

 

7 hours ago, Checker Mate said:

Only if his surname is "Choad"

😅

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

The fat shaming was the old skin folds test, you would come off your break and see the callipers and you knew your were in trouble.  Then coming back after Christmas always 3-4km time trail and skin fold test.

 
1 hour ago, drdrake said:

The fat shaming was the old skin folds test, you would come off your break and see the callipers and you knew your were in trouble.  Then coming back after Christmas always 3-4km time trail and skin fold test.

The dreaded callipers. 😱
One afternoon last week Fritta was at his mum’s. She said, “Are you staying for dinner, Bayles?” He said, “Depends on what you’re cooking, I’ve got a fat-pinch and a 2k-er tomorrow.” She was cooking a creamy pasta dish. He didn’t stay for dinner. 😁


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 188 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies