Jump to content

Featured Replies

Can I make a double entendre joke involving Petty’s name and the behaviour of being petty?

Too obvious?

Too obvious and I shouldn’t bother?

And I should be [censored] up the [censored] until my [censored] is [censored]?

Jesus, it’s just a joke…

 
7 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Can I make a double entendre joke involving Petty’s name and the behaviour of being petty?

Too obvious?

Too obvious and I shouldn’t bother?

And I should be [censored] up the [censored] until my [censored] is [censored]?

Jesus, it’s just a joke…

Its ok, I don't think anyone understood it anyway.

 
7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

I heard it was only $1M year one and that over four years worked out to be more like $600K per year 

48 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Can I make a double entendre joke involving Petty’s name and the behaviour of being petty?

Too obvious?

Too obvious and I shouldn’t bother?

And I should be [censored] up the [censored] until my [censored] is [censored]?

Jesus, it’s just a joke…

Hmmm, let's see who I can [censored] up the [censored]

Oh look at this guy. Oh I can't believe it. That is so lame.

I'm going to [censored] him up the [censored] so hard he won't post here for another year

He, he ,he RPFC  you've done it again

Who's king of the boards. RPFC thats who. Take a walk loser


Not a big deal but....Harrison Petty's instagram bio yesterday had melbournefc references in it (as per below image).

 

Those references have now been removed....

Screen Shot 2023-10-10 at 8.57.0.png

Edited by wheaters31

5 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Nothing like keeping a borderline best 22 player against their will just to spite another club who refuses to trade one of their best players in exchange 😂

One of their best ‘contracted’ players. 
Adelaide are really scum 

1 hour ago, wheaters31 said:

Not a big deal but....Harrison Petty's instagram bio yesterday had melbournefc references in it (as per below image).

 

Those references have now been removed....

Screen Shot 2023-10-10 at 8.57.0.png

Why did you take a random screenshot yesterday?

 

Apologies to Harry and Casey (Chambers):

Am I not Petty enough?
Is my foot too broken?
Do I cry too much?
Am I trade verboten?
Don't I make you better?
Should I go Wudinna?
Why all this fuss about me?

He's obviously having serious consideration of going home. There's enough smoke there.

Do we cash in now with one of Adelaide's early picks or do we wait until free agency.

There is also the consideration with his foot injury. From what I heard it was a pretty significant injury to the point where there is some ongoing concerns whether it'll hold up to the rigours of AFL level in years to come.

I wouldn't be surprised if eventually Petty does go back home to SA whether that's this period or free agency. 


11 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Why? We would be able to match that deal. In fact I would be shocked if we don’t have an extension on the table for him if he’s willing to commit beyond the next 2 years. 

I love Petty but he is not worth 800k a year, we can’t be held to ransom 

Edited by Demons11

45 minutes ago, demosaw said:

Apologies to Harry and Casey (Chambers):

Am I not Petty enough?
Is my foot too broken?
Do I cry too much?
Am I trade verboten?
Don't I make you better?
Should I go Wudinna?
Why all this fuss about me?

Love your work!

8 hours ago, deespicable me said:

Hmmm, let's see who I can [censored] up the [censored]

Oh look at this guy. Oh I can't believe it. That is so lame.

I'm going to [censored] him up the [censored] so hard he won't post here for another year

He, he ,he RPFC  you've done it again

Who's king of the boards. RPFC thats who. Take a walk loser

Jesus. Did you have a ‘petty’ joke all lined up? Tell it to your probation officer then, it’s fine.

7 hours ago, wheaters31 said:

Not a big deal but....Harrison Petty's instagram bio yesterday had melbournefc references in it (as per below image).

 

Those references have now been removed....

Screen Shot 2023-10-10 at 8.57.0.png

Well that’s weird. 

19 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

On the assumption we're chips in on next year's flag rather than taking a potential step back:

Petty should only be traded if Harry McKay or an equivalent proven key forward is coming through the doors. And even McKay won't solve our atrocious conversion for goal under pressure (although he once kicked 58.33 in a season)

I cannot fathom how the list management and coaching team will be confident of winning next year's flag with T Mac, BBB and JVR as our 3 best key forwards, while losing Petty and not recruiting another established KPF. The fact that they (probably) called T Hawkins shows you how the club feels about their tall forward depth chart, and how life would look like without Petty.

Unless we get a proven 35-40 goal a year tall forward which is what Petty is highly likely to kick next year off a 20+ game season, then we'll hold Petty to his contract.

if the Crows want Petty they need to trade us (puts on flax jacket) Tex Walker! He looked awesome this year and looks like he has another couple of years left in him. 


$1m is a huge offer. His footy career is short. gotta make the best of it while you can. And he has had a couple of injuries so durability an issue. If I'm Petty I'm taking that offer. Few people wouldn't

1 hour ago, Demons11 said:

I love Petty but he is not worth 800k a year, we can’t be held to ransom 

In a world where Ben McKay is getting that on  5 year deal . Petty is worth at least that

Why would we consider trading him when we're short on forwards and he has 2 years left on his contract. Next year at the earliest,

Also why does the AFL tolerate clubs trying to entice players to break contracts. Ramshackle organisation.

11 minutes ago, BDA said:

$1m is a huge offer. His footy career is short. gotta make the best of it while you can. And he has had a couple of injuries so durability an issue. If I'm Petty I'm taking that offer. Few people wouldn't

but it's not his choice

if radelaide value him so much where is the trade offer mfc can't refuse?


8 minutes ago, loges said:

Why would we consider trading him when we're short on forwards and he has 2 years left on his contract. Next year at the earliest,

Also why does the AFL tolerate clubs trying to entice players to break contracts. Ramshackle organisation.

Agree, it's called (draft) tampering in the NBA massive fines. I loathe the AFL as an organisation just so compromised in every facet of the game 

9 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

I heard it was only $1M year one and that over four years worked out to be more like $600K per year 

That news item said 'around $800k' a year after the first-year $1m...

 
9 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

but it's not his choice

if radelaide value him so much where is the trade offer mfc can't refuse?

got that. there has to be a player coming our way otherwise we won't do it. picks no use. we'll just be leaving ourselves short otherwise.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 221 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies