Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
6 minutes ago, dee-tox said:

Football seems insignificant when compared to the cricket!

STOKES GONE!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

Choco the kicking expert? he’s doing a ripper job hey?

I only get to watch games on TV from here in Perth, but for the most part, when cameras focus on the coaches' box, Chocko doesn't seem present in the game or involved with players. It's just something I've noticed. Does it mean anything? ... shrug!!

 
5 hours ago, deegirl said:

I’m in Reykjavik and have just woken up to this result. What a bunch of [censored]. 
 

They’ve gone back to pre2021 where you can’t trust them to execute the basics. 

Go enjoy a day at the Blue Lagoon and pretend it didn’t happen 😊


10 minutes ago, DemonicFinalFantasy said:

I only get to watch games on TV from here in Perth, but for the most part, when cameras focus on the coaches' box, Chocko doesn't seem present in the game or involved with players. It's just something I've noticed. Does it mean anything? ... shrug!!

Williams is constantly giving of himself.

I've seen him at trainings even giving drills and hints of footy skills to the support staff. 

He never seems to stop (not manically so), he is either doing or preparing. 

Edited by kev martin

48 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

our entire gameplan is built around smart ball use from the back half

he's integral to our defensive set-up imo

Bring Howes in to trial in this role.  They are quite similar although Howes probably half a season behind at this point.  Worth a block of matches though imv

That allows McVee to move up to the wing to replace Hunter.  Hunter is completely innefective in general play and by foot.  Dumps rubbish tumble lolly pops short into the HF area pretty much every time with no penetration.

McVee then becomes more damaging and effective in terms of his ability by foot and will give us some run and carry through the middle.  Might also hit some targets on the 45 and help to change angles coming into the 50,  which we rarely ever do.  Makes us too easy to defend every week coming in in straight lines.

McVee is also a decent user if he gets near 50 vs say Rivers who just bombs it in.

Howes a VG user by foot and hand.  Howes is also capable of hitting targets inside 50 when pushing up high.

The above eliminates one more poor ball user in Hunter and potentially improves our connections forward of center x 2 !

Edited by Demon Dynasty

16 minutes ago, DemonicFinalFantasy said:

I only get to watch games on TV from here in Perth, but for the most part, when cameras focus on the coaches' box, Chocko doesn't seem present in the game or involved with players. It's just something I've noticed. Does it mean anything? ... shrug!!

Isn't he often on the bench giving advice and encouragement?

 

It's Cricket season anyways!

5 hours ago, beelzebub said:

No we won't... how many times ffs.

This is woeful footy...not even footy....just woeful. 

We learn Jack !!

An AFL game isnt where the learning is... on the whiteboard, at the reviews, on the track.. practice games...   thats where you learn

Games for 4pts is where you execute.. where you Do. 

Not us apparently 

Embarrassing to watch.

 

I was mocking the Goodwin presser..


3 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

Seriously consider going to watch a local game of footy. It is a world away from AFL (a very good thing imo) and can be extremely cathartic. There is a real sense of beauty to grassroots footy, it’s the way the game is meant to be played.

Might I suggest you come down and watch Fish Creek! Never a dull moment and you won’t regret it 😝.

 

Casey is playing Sandringham at Trevor Barker oval this Sunday.

9 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

He lacks composure. He rushes himself which leads to fumbles, high pressure kicking etc.

He needs to watch McVee move and learn to move out of pressure situations before disposing the ball. 

This. 

 

8 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Yes and no.

On expected scores we should have won today 74-42. Expected scores account for the difficulty of the shots we took. So it's not all because our shots were hard and we can't be expected to kick goals from them.

AFAIK expected scores don't take into account pressure and fatigue, and I'm confident that because our forward half is always so congested we are taking our shots under more pressure and with greater fatigue (particularly from our half-forwards and mids who are being asked to cover heaps of ground). Plus there is the mental pressure - the more we are inaccurate, the more pressure there is each time.

Yep, finally someone has hit the nail on the head.

The sample size it too large for it not to be related to our game plan. We also have some terrible kicks and that's contributes. But this is essentially the issue. when you play a forward half turnover game, there will always be large numbers of the opposite in your forward.

There were 3 times when GWS took the ball from our back half and had 2 or 3 full lead up marks. When I saw that I was shocked, because I couldn't remember I single time when there was a Melbourne player in space leading up and getting the ball. It looked like they were playing a different game. 


Where were our defenders in the last few minutes!!!

3 minutes to go and not a single defender within cooee of the goal square!  Kelly's kick bounced before going over the line... 

Its worrying if leaving the goal square undefended with mere minutes to go is our MO for protecting a small lead.

Sure we were attacking to win but leaving most of the d50 wide open made us sitting ducks for a Giant's 'out the back' goal or a Kelly long range kick.

Poor leadership by defenders for end of game defence tactics.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

11 hours ago, A F said:

I didn't excuse the the inability execute, but there are some on this thread, maybe many going by the shallowness of some of the analysis that are denying fatigue is playing a factor. It clear as day is. As I keep saying, we need to be better though.

As clear as day is it. Haha. 

Mate, I'll buy you a new shovel because you need it. 

You've genuinely lost the plot. 

22 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Where were our defenders in the last few minutes!!!

3 minutes to go and not a single defender within cooee of the goal square!  Kelly's kick bounced before going over the line... 

Its worrying if leaving the goal square undefended with mere minutes to go is our MO for protecting a small lead.

Sure we were attacking to win but leaving most of the d50 wide open made us sitting ducks for a Giant's 'out the back' goal or a Kelly long range kick.

Poor leadership by defenders for end of game defence tactics.

Football 101

NEVER leave the goals  ( arc from one point post to other ) undefended once ball in your defensive half.

35 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Where were our defenders in the last few minutes!!!

3 minutes to go and not a single defender within cooee of the goal square!  Kelly's kick bounced before going over the line... 

Its worrying if leaving the goal square undefended with mere minutes to go is our MO for protecting a small lead.

Sure we were attacking to win but leaving most of the d50 wide open made us sitting ducks for a Giant's 'out the back' goal or a Kelly long range kick.

Poor leadership by defenders for end of game defence tactics.

10 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Football 101

NEVER leave the goals  ( arc from one point post to other ) undefended once ball in your defensive half.

Not really on the players though.

They were continuing to defend the way we set up to defend, by pressing up into the forward half.

Absent a coaching directive, they weren't going to drop back into the D50 and have no influence unless GWS got the ball that deep. They were always going to sit high. 

IMO we press too high but once you accept that press, I think the blame for how sides score out the back is a coaching one, not a leadership or player one.


It’s doing my head in, how for years now we can’t seem to connect with our forward line.

Its a piece of the puzzle we can never fix.

Its funny because watching Casey and listening to the commentators say that Melbourne has an abundance of key forwards in JVR, Schache, Jefferson, Ben Brown, Fritsch, Smith, McDonald and the two Ruckmen, yet we don’t have a player in the top 10 in the AFL for goal kicking.

Only a few weeks ago we beat the number one team on the comp.

There is talent here despite our woeful forward line.

Of the seven games played interstate including Kardinia, we  put away the Eagles who are shocking and just narrowly beat the Suns.

We lost the other five.

Word to the wise....don't sell anymore home games to play interstate.

We play the big G well.

Missing Oliver is huge.

Max is having a bad season, along with Kozzie and Anb.

The Grundy Gawn combo looked awesome pre season bit never launched.

The game has passed Melksham.

Chandler needs to be dropped like four weeks ago.

I thought Goody was stuck in his ways but now he seems erratic with his throwing away the Petty experiment, dropping Tomlinson and then Jvr.

This list is in its prime, but something is not right. Fair to say we also don't have very much depth. 

Like the dogs breaking more than half a decade of drought was a momentous effort.

But it seems like now the peak has been conquered the will to continue has withered a fair bit.

How does pretty much the same bunch end up like this?. It's not like they are too old.

 

 

 
17 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Only a few weeks ago we beat the number one team on the comp.

There is talent here despite our woeful forward line.

Of the seven games played interstate including Kardinia, we  put away the Eagles who are shocking and just narrowly beat the Suns.

We lost the other five.

Word to the wise....don't sell anymore home games to play interstate.

We play the big G well.

Missing Oliver is huge.

Max is having a bad season, along with Kozzie and Anb.

The Grundy Gawn combo looked awesome pre season bit never launched.

The game has passed Melksham.

Chandler needs to be dropped like four weeks ago.

I thought Goody was stuck in his ways but now he seems erratic with his throwing away the Petty experiment, dropping Tomlinson and then Jvr.

This list is in its prime, but something is not right. Fair to say we also don't have very much depth. 

Like the dogs breaking more than half a decade of drought was a momentous effort.

But it seems like now the peak has been conquered the will to continue has withered a fair bit.

How does pretty much the same bunch end up like this?. It's not like they are too old.

 

 

The Game plan stinks and its execution, even worse.Oh and before I forget too many players are overated and more are NQR! We need to put a broom through the joint.

Edited by picket fence

44 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Not really on the players though.

They were continuing to defend the way we set up to defend, by pressing up into the forward half.

Absent a coaching directive, they weren't going to drop back into the D50 and have no influence unless GWS got the ball that deep. They were always going to sit high. 

IMO we press too high but once you accept that press, I think the blame for how sides score out the back is a coaching one, not a leadership or player one.

I agree that we press too high and it is our system.

However, on field leaders have a role to play in the tactics for moment-to-moment action especially when there is no opportunity for coaches to send a runner out, which can only be when a goal is scored.

And most clubs train and train and train possible end of game scenarios so not to rely on coaches in those frantic minutes.   I would hope May and Lever have some license to employ one of those scenarios when coaching directive isn't available. 

I don't really wish to start a blaming game.  My comment on lack of on field leadership wasn't intended to blame anyone but imv a fair observation of what happened:  our system broke down. 

Edited by Lucifers Hero


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 342 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies