Jump to content

JvR Free!!!

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Just now, DutchDemons said:

Robbo and Gerald aren’t on Thursday night

:( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    why was there no argument about the severity of contact being downgraded from high

    must say i thought the arguments were pretty thin

    i could've thought of a lot of things to challenge

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Just now, Hawny for Gawny said:

    :( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

    Great handle their bud. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Love 1
     
    3 minutes ago, Its Time for Another said:

    I've been known to slip into an afterthought in my time. But I digress......

    So... ah...... how about this weather?  And oh yes, what the heck is happening with Jacob?!

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    55 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

    As for the reasonable test, what sort of precedent does it establish if his suspension is upheld? 

    No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

    40 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

    Just saw on the news that Brad Green has been sanctioned by the AFL for his twitter comment into this ban!

    Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 2

    For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    5 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

    Rotating Outer Space GIF

    Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule, and not explicitly stated.

    Edited by kev martin

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 3
     

    Come on…will struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 3

    Just now, Demonland said:

    1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

    Is this good or bad or is everyone drunk? 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    Just now, kev martin said:

    Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule. 

    What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

  • Quote
    • Haha 2

    Board can't come to an unanimous decision...

    CASE DISMISSED!!

    Edited by Demon Dynasty

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

    No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

    Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

    He may soon glow in the dark.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    1 minute ago, Mickey said:

    For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

    100%, and if our arguments weren’t considered strong, we have a decision by now!

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 minute ago, Dee Zephyr said:

    Come on…will struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.

    Get your money on any dogs named Bull-[censored], Joke, Farce and Travesty.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2

    2 minutes ago, Mickey said:

    For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

    Great point, I imagine Zita's understanding of law limits what he can actually understand and remember.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 minute ago, Demonland said:

    1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

    cripps case was 2 hours

    just saying

  • Quote
    • Shocked 2

    We mostly understand what a so called "duty of care" means in a legal sense - the ability to foresee the outcome of potentially hazardous actions and the duty to avoid those actions. Overwhelmingly, there is time and space to consider actions that might fall under that duty.

    How could this possibly translate to a dynamic, fast moving and physical contact sport where decisions and actions are made in microseconds? It can't.

    Only a genius lawyer could concoct such an argument. It's garbage in this instance.

  • Quote
    • Like 7
     
    2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

    What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

    it's all in the 1909 case ... read up on it

  • Quote
    • Haha 3

    Maybe a 2 down to 1 outcome at best

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Essendon

      What were they thinking? I mean by “they” the coaching panel and team selectors who chose the team to play against an opponent who, like Melbourne, had made a poor start to the season and who they appeared perfectly capable of beating in what was possibly the last chance to turn the season around.It’s no secret that the Demons’ forward line is totally dysfunctional, having opened the season barely able to average sixty points per game which means there has been no semblance of any system from the team going forward into attack. Nevertheless, on Saturday night at the Adelaide Oval in one of the Gather Round showcase games, Melbourne, with Max Gawn dominating the hit outs against a depleted Essendon ruck resulting from Nick Bryan’s early exit, finished just ahead in clearances won and found itself inside the 50 metre arc 51 times to 43. The end result was a final score that had the Bombers winning 15.6 (96) to 8.9 (57). On balance, one could expect this to result in a two or three goal win, but in this case, it translated into a six and a half goal defeat because they only managed to convert eight times or 11.68% of their entries. The Bombers more than doubled that. On Thursday night at the same ground, the losing team Adelaide managed to score 100 points from almost the same number of times inside 50.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Essendon

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • 32 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Fremantle

      The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Haha
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 86 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Essendon

      Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

        • Like
      • 24 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Essendon

      Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

        • Vomit
        • Sad
        • Like
      • 264 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • GAMEDAY: Essendon

      It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

        • Like
      • 723 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All