Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (โ‹ฎ) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Just now, DutchDemons said:

Robbo and Gerald arenโ€™t on Thursday night

:( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

ย 

why was there no argument about the severity of contact being downgraded from high

must say i thought the arguments were pretty thin

i could've thought of a lot of things to challenge

Just now, Hawny for Gawny said:

:( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

Great handle their bud.ย 

ย 
3 minutes ago, Its Time for Another said:

I've been known to slip into an afterthought in my time. But I digress......

So... ah...... how about this weather?ย  And oh yes, what the heck is happening with Jacob?!


55 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

As for the reasonable test, what sort of precedent does it establish if his suspension is upheld?ย 

No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

40 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

Just saw on the news that Brad Green has been sanctioned by the AFL for his twitter comment into this ban!

Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

5 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Rotating Outer Space GIF

Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule, and not explicitly stated.

Edited by kev martin

ย 

Come onโ€ฆwill struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.


Just now, Demonland said:

1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

Is this good or bad or is everyone drunk?ย 

Just now, kev martin said:

Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule.ย 

What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

Board can't come to an unanimous decision...

CASE DISMISSED!!

Edited by Demon Dynasty

2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

He may soon glow in the dark.


1 minute ago, Mickey said:

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

100%, and if our arguments werenโ€™t considered strong, we have a decision by now!

1 minute ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Come onโ€ฆwill struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.

Get your money on any dogs named Bull-[censored], Joke, Farce and Travesty.


2 minutes ago, Mickey said:

For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

Great point, I imagine Zita's understanding of law limits what he can actually understand and remember.

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

cripps case was 2 hours

just saying

We mostly understand what a so called "duty of care" means in a legal sense - the ability to foresee the outcome of potentially hazardous actions and the duty to avoid those actions. Overwhelmingly, there is time and space to consider actions that might fall under that duty.

How could this possibly translate to a dynamic, fast moving and physical contact sport where decisions and actions are made in microseconds? It can't.

Only a genius lawyer could concoct such an argument. It's garbage in this instance.

ย 
2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

it's all in the 1909 case ... read up on it

Maybe a 2 down to 1 outcome at best


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • AFLW REPORT: Gold Coast

    The forecast said wind. The ladder said mismatch. The scoreboard said obliteration. Melbourne didnโ€™t just beat Gold Coast โ€” they dismantled them: 13.15 (93) to 0.6 (6). An 87-point obliteration, the Suns held goalless, and the Demons delivering their second-highest winning margin and third-highest score in AFLW history.

    • 0 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #28 Will Verrall

    It was a tough ask for him to break through as a 199cm ruckman in the shadow of an all-time great in that position who is also the club captain. He had some good days at Casey but was unable to progress and was delisted at the end of the season.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #29 Tom Campbell

    The 33-year-old Campbell has yet to play AFL football for Melbourne, but his Casey form has been strong and he has been retained as a ready-made ruck depth option who is widely regarded as someone who is excellent for the culture of the club.

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
    • 8 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #30 Harry Sharpย 

    The Demons acquired an interesting player in Sharp, who narrowly missed securing a spot in the Lionsโ€™ premiership team last year. The 22-year-old medium forward played in the opening round this season and ended up with 18 senior games, although he was substituted in or out in for ten of those matches. He demonstrated glimpses of form, but ultimately ended the year on the margins of the team.

      • Like
    • 14 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Worked his way back after a slow start and a further slump in form going into the midseason but became a solid contributor for the club in the latter half of 2025. Closing in on 300 goals for the club.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • AFLW PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    On Friday, the Demons return to our Casey Fields fortress where they have a 77% win rate. The scent of September is in the air and the struggling Suns are on the horizon. The Cranbourne weather forecast? Ominous, like the match itself: a strong chance of carnage. Letโ€™s be honest, last weekโ€™s first half against the West Coast was a training drill but we dropped our guard in the final quarter. While this match is a mismatch on paper โ€” second versus seventeenth โ€” football is won in the wind, the contests, and the moments.

      • Like
    • 3 replies

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions โ†’ Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.