Jump to content

JvR Free!!!

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Just now, DutchDemons said:

Robbo and Gerald aren’t on Thursday night

:( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    why was there no argument about the severity of contact being downgraded from high

    must say i thought the arguments were pretty thin

    i could've thought of a lot of things to challenge

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Just now, Hawny for Gawny said:

    :( forgot, they have HARLEY REID on tonight though so idk if they can spare the 2 mins to report this case

    Great handle their bud. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Love 1
     
    3 minutes ago, Its Time for Another said:

    I've been known to slip into an afterthought in my time. But I digress......

    So... ah...... how about this weather?  And oh yes, what the heck is happening with Jacob?!

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    55 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

    As for the reasonable test, what sort of precedent does it establish if his suspension is upheld? 

    No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

    40 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

    Just saw on the news that Brad Green has been sanctioned by the AFL for his twitter comment into this ban!

    Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 2

    For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    5 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

    Rotating Outer Space GIF

    Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule, and not explicitly stated.

    Edited by kev martin

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 3
     

    Come on…will struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 3

    Just now, Demonland said:

    1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

    Is this good or bad or is everyone drunk? 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    Just now, kev martin said:

    Exactly, the moon doesn't rotate unless the appeal board tells it too, as duty of care is an extrapolation of the rule. 

    What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

  • Quote
    • Haha 2

    Board can't come to an unanimous decision...

    CASE DISMISSED!!

    Edited by Demon Dynasty

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

    No sort of precedent. The AFL doesn't do precedent. Within two weeks, someone will do exactly what JvR did and won't be cited.

    Back in the day you weren't allowed to criticise Josef Stalin either. In more modern times, it's Putin. Green shouldn't stray too near any windows.

    He may soon glow in the dark.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    1 minute ago, Mickey said:

    For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

    100%, and if our arguments weren’t considered strong, we have a decision by now!

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 minute ago, Dee Zephyr said:

    Come on…will struggle to get a quaddie on at Sandown dogs at this rate.

    Get your money on any dogs named Bull-[censored], Joke, Farce and Travesty.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2

    2 minutes ago, Mickey said:

    For those saying our legal argument doesn't seem strong, I wouldn't necessarily take Zita's tweets as encompassing our whole argument. On Tuesday he said they were just arguing semantics, and it was actually the whole premise of the AFL's argument re: the interpretation of the rule. Pretty important stuff, you'd think

    Great point, I imagine Zita's understanding of law limits what he can actually understand and remember.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    1 minute ago, Demonland said:

    1 Hour of Deliberating and counting ...

    cripps case was 2 hours

    just saying

  • Quote
    • Shocked 2

    We mostly understand what a so called "duty of care" means in a legal sense - the ability to foresee the outcome of potentially hazardous actions and the duty to avoid those actions. Overwhelmingly, there is time and space to consider actions that might fall under that duty.

    How could this possibly translate to a dynamic, fast moving and physical contact sport where decisions and actions are made in microseconds? It can't.

    Only a genius lawyer could concoct such an argument. It's garbage in this instance.

  • Quote
    • Like 7
     
    2 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

    What, specifically, is the moon? As a point of law, I mean.

    it's all in the 1909 case ... read up on it

  • Quote
    • Haha 3

    Maybe a 2 down to 1 outcome at best

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 15

      As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 276 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Haha
      • 120 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 33 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

        • Like
      • 252 replies
      Demonland
    View All