Jump to content

POSTGAME: Rd 08 vs Gold Coast


Demonland

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, D Rev said:

I was at this game and thoroughly enjoyed it, though it was more than a little stressful.  There really is something to be said for the smaller "boutique" grounds that represent communities in the northern states that people want to travel to (here's looking at you GWS).

The first line of respect I'd like to pay is for the bloke on the accoustic guitar on the MMM stage who seemed to play "Free Falling" for 7 hours straight (I got there in time for the reserves).  Tom Petty no longer owns that song.

This was a bloody tough game, the Suns are a very good team who move the ball at G-Force speed from their backline to their forward line.  Their mids are absolute gold who dominated congestion. 

I actually feel for Suns fans, they don't have another home game for SIX WEEKS.  Can you imagine that happening to a Victorian team?  I understand they need to sell games to the NT for cash (imagine being there...).  I don't know what their fitness program is like, but thats a big interruption to the season and makes it hard to build support.  Great ground though, and loved the passion of their fans. 

As for us, we started well then they got on top and really pushed us to the end.  The Grundy-Max thing seems to take away a bit from both of them, Max plays his best in the middle or intercepting marks and sending him to the middle FT seems to be a 'break in case of emergency' play at the moment.  Grundy is perfectly adequate as a tall up forward.

Speaking of forwards, Fritsch had his worst game in years, so lets forget it and hope it doesn't happen again for years. Langdon was absolutely woeful too, I thought he was on mushrooms he was out of position so often.  Again, here's hoping it's a blip.

Spargo had an awesome game in the twos and needs to come in to stop the ball rebounding out of the forward 50 as soon as it hits the deck.  It was good to see Disco get through a (nearly) full game without being concussed but he was too undersized for Casboult and its a shame it took Goodwin 3 quarters to work that out.  Im happy for Petty to be back or forward but Spargo should come back in.

Brown looked slow in the twos and his opponent regularly outmarked our out-ran him.  I'm not convinced he is a better option than Grundy up forward.  Sounds crazy, I know.

 

Thanks for this post. Enjoyed reading it. Your assessment of Bbb worries ne. We really need someone to step up. Especially if Jvr is out and speaking of Petty he's not a forward. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Monbon said:

1: The Suns are a VERY talented team. They beat Geelong a few weeks ago.

2: That is about the most inconsistent umpiring I've ever seen. One push in the back at a marking contest paid, the next three not etc etc

3: Please, keep Petty down back.

4: The May bashing by Demonlanders is pathetic.

5: You will probably never again see Fritsch, Langdon, Chandler, Jordan and Neale Bullen play so quietly in one match again. Jacob Van R needs to hold his marks.

6: That Melbourne  won this game is testament to their determination to keep at it, to not give in. 

7: We forget that Van R., Mcvee, Turner, Bowey to a lesser extent, ditto Rivers, have not played all that many games. 

8: I'll take a win like this any day.

9: Van Ruyen should not get cited by Christian. He tried to spoil, actually got a fist to the ball, and in the process hurt the Suns player accidentally. There was absolutely no malice or intent to injure.

10: The commentary was a bestial joke.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Deebauched said:

WCW

Yep,....i briefly logged into match day posts and it was dreadful. Insults flying everywhere about Grundy May Lever and Fritsch. Is Deespencer a bonifide Mfc supporter? 

How many teams would have beaten the Suns yesterday Maybe 2 or 3  or maybe none.

Rivers looked as sick as a dog after the game in the rooms. An dees official said Chandler was ill before the game. Sounds like they ate some jungle grub that didnt agree with them. Goodwin never complains or makes excuses.

Brayshaw thought it was a damn good win under the circumstances.

That face slap was a mistake: if you notice, I've also entered a 'clap'. A, being an alte kaker means my keyboard is always 159,000 steps ahead of my ability to use it, and B, I'll ask the question: What can you give a man who has everything? Answer: Penicillin. This comment is in relation to 'the clap'.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Yeah, but 8 teams travel every 2nd week all year every year. I can understand maybe off short breaks but we had a week between games and our last game was a glorified training run.

Always look on the bright side of life....

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a good game of footy. No quarter asked and none given. Heart in mouth stuff for us Dees supporters when what-his-name had a shot to tie it up but good to get the 4 points from the game.

We came off a trip to Adelaide, a 5 day break and then a tip to Queensland for this game. I know that The Suns also had a lot of travel to deal with recently, but I was surprised at the tempo and intensity delivered by both teams.

My big take from the game is that while the coaches bang on about the way the team looks to reset during games in response to the circumstances, I do not see the same 'reset' from the match committee at selection given the dire situation of our forward line.

One of the cornerstones of our 21 Premiership was the stability and structure of our defence. We built the gameplan around this structure and it was a success. I heard that Goodwin was talking about clearances and that we base a lot of our attack on winning turnovers after possessions out of the clearances and I cannot argue with that given our results but what I would argue is that if that is the case we need to ensure that we have the best people in the best places in defence. To my mind that means rebuilding the defence around May, Lever and Petty as the talls with Salem (when fit and in form), Bowey, Rivers, Hibberd, Brayshaw and McVee as the smaller running defenders. 

Petty back is what is needed at the moment. It seems as if in his absence, there has been a little too much pressure on May to perform and it is to the detriment of his game.

Well we have to discuss the forwards and there is a lot to discuss.

Petty is not the answer to any question regarding the forwards.

JVR out for  couple of weeks.

This leaves a couple of large holes at the pointy end. What to do?

I would try Brown and Schache as the talls for the next couple of weeks with Gawn/Grundy resting there as required. Fristch as a genuine spare medium forward and have Chandler, Spargo, Pickett and ANB as crumbers/harassers at the fall of the ball.

I would have Harmes in the team to cover any tagging roles that crop up during the game. I would have loved Goodwin to pull the trigger on the sub much earlier and get Harmes into the game to tag Anderson yesterday. 

With these suggestions I am not sure what that does to the team selection.

B: Lever, May, Hibberd

HB: Bowey, Petty, Rivers

C: Langdon, Viney, Hunter

HF: ANB, Schache, Chandler

F: Fristch, Brown, Pickett

Fol: Grundy, Petracca, Oliver

I: Gawn, McVee, Sparrow, Harmes/ Jordon (one of these two as sub)

A lot of flexibility and options in that team and all playing primary position to their strengths.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was at the game and we got out of jail big time. We were very lucky to win it and thank god that last shot at goal went through for a point. Not sure what has happened to Fritta but he had a very bad game but hopefully only one. 
 

Now, the umpires, my god I have never been to or seen a game where it has been this bad. They were calling Melb players to play on after we got a free when there was CLEARLY NO ADVANTAGE, called frees for GC consistently when they were very dubious, called Hunt for holding the ball when he clearly disposed of the ball and then other similar situations to Hunts didn’t get called against the suns. 
 

They were pathetic, inconsistent, hopeless, atrocious, and should NEVER umpire again. They even pointed in the wrong direction to where the player was taking the free. It was comedy hour but wasn’t funni at all. 

Very happy we got the win but bloody hell the umps need a rocket. 

Edited by DemonOX
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


38 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Great listening to Chaplin and he mentioned it was our 3rd game in 12 days - 3 wins is a fantastic result. 

Yep, Chaplin’s words.  “We are bloody proud of this group” 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CHF said:

That was a good game of footy. No quarter asked and none given. Heart in mouth stuff for us Dees supporters when what-his-name had a shot to tie it up but good to get the 4 points from the game.

We came off a trip to Adelaide, a 5 day break and then a tip to Queensland for this game. I know that The Suns also had a lot of travel to deal with recently, but I was surprised at the tempo and intensity delivered by both teams.

My big take from the game is that while the coaches bang on about the way the team looks to reset during games in response to the circumstances, I do not see the same 'reset' from the match committee at selection given the dire situation of our forward line.

One of the cornerstones of our 21 Premiership was the stability and structure of our defence. We built the gameplan around this structure and it was a success. I heard that Goodwin was talking about clearances and that we base a lot of our attack on winning turnovers after possessions out of the clearances and I cannot argue with that given our results but what I would argue is that if that is the case we need to ensure that we have the best people in the best places in defence. To my mind that means rebuilding the defence around May, Lever and Petty as the talls with Salem (when fit and in form), Bowey, Rivers, Hibberd, Brayshaw and McVee as the smaller running defenders. 

Petty back is what is needed at the moment. It seems as if in his absence, there has been a little too much pressure on May to perform and it is to the detriment of his game.

Well we have to discuss the forwards and there is a lot to discuss.

Petty is not the answer to any question regarding the forwards.

JVR out for  couple of weeks.

This leaves a couple of large holes at the pointy end. What to do?

I would try Brown and Schache as the talls for the next couple of weeks with Gawn/Grundy resting there as required. Fristch as a genuine spare medium forward and have Chandler, Spargo, Pickett and ANB as crumbers/harassers at the fall of the ball.

I would have Harmes in the team to cover any tagging roles that crop up during the game. I would have loved Goodwin to pull the trigger on the sub much earlier and get Harmes into the game to tag Anderson yesterday. 

With these suggestions I am not sure what that does to the team selection.

B: Lever, May, Hibberd

HB: Bowey, Petty, Rivers

C: Langdon, Viney, Hunter

HF: ANB, Schache, Chandler

F: Fristch, Brown, Pickett

Fol: Grundy, Petracca, Oliver

I: Gawn, McVee, Sparrow, Harmes/ Jordon (one of these two as sub)

A lot of flexibility and options in that team and all playing primary position to their strengths.

"Dire situation" Really? We are the second highest scoring team in the comp. Something must be working. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, djr said:

"Dire situation" Really? We are the second highest scoring team in the comp. Something must be working. 

My thought on reading @CHF's post exactly.

I would agree that our forward line is not quite right at the moment (mainly because I steadfastly do not support Petty as a forward), but "dire situation" is a ridiculous thing to say given we're the 2nd highest scoring side, and only 3 points behind Geelong who have Hawkins and Cameron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CHF said:

That was a good game of footy. No quarter asked and none given. Heart in mouth stuff for us Dees supporters when what-his-name had a shot to tie it up but good to get the 4 points from the game.

We came off a trip to Adelaide, a 5 day break and then a tip to Queensland for this game. I know that The Suns also had a lot of travel to deal with recently, but I was surprised at the tempo and intensity delivered by both teams.

My big take from the game is that while the coaches bang on about the way the team looks to reset during games in response to the circumstances, I do not see the same 'reset' from the match committee at selection given the dire situation of our forward line.

One of the cornerstones of our 21 Premiership was the stability and structure of our defence. We built the gameplan around this structure and it was a success. I heard that Goodwin was talking about clearances and that we base a lot of our attack on winning turnovers after possessions out of the clearances and I cannot argue with that given our results but what I would argue is that if that is the case we need to ensure that we have the best people in the best places in defence. To my mind that means rebuilding the defence around May, Lever and Petty as the talls with Salem (when fit and in form), Bowey, Rivers, Hibberd, Brayshaw and McVee as the smaller running defenders. 

Petty back is what is needed at the moment. It seems as if in his absence, there has been a little too much pressure on May to perform and it is to the detriment of his game.

Well we have to discuss the forwards and there is a lot to discuss.

Petty is not the answer to any question regarding the forwards.

JVR out for  couple of weeks.

This leaves a couple of large holes at the pointy end. What to do?

I would try Brown and Schache as the talls for the next couple of weeks with Gawn/Grundy resting there as required. Fristch as a genuine spare medium forward and have Chandler, Spargo, Pickett and ANB as crumbers/harassers at the fall of the ball.

I would have Harmes in the team to cover any tagging roles that crop up during the game. I would have loved Goodwin to pull the trigger on the sub much earlier and get Harmes into the game to tag Anderson yesterday. 

With these suggestions I am not sure what that does to the team selection.

B: Lever, May, Hibberd

HB: Bowey, Petty, Rivers

C: Langdon, Viney, Hunter

HF: ANB, Schache, Chandler

F: Fristch, Brown, Pickett

Fol: Grundy, Petracca, Oliver

I: Gawn, McVee, Sparrow, Harmes/ Jordon (one of these two as sub)

A lot of flexibility and options in that team and all playing primary position to their strengths.

I like your thinking CHF do you have any influence on the match committee???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CHF said:

That was a good game of footy. No quarter asked and none given. Heart in mouth stuff for us Dees supporters when what-his-name had a shot to tie it up but good to get the 4 points from the game.

We came off a trip to Adelaide, a 5 day break and then a tip to Queensland for this game. I know that The Suns also had a lot of travel to deal with recently, but I was surprised at the tempo and intensity delivered by both teams.

My big take from the game is that while the coaches bang on about the way the team looks to reset during games in response to the circumstances, I do not see the same 'reset' from the match committee at selection given the dire situation of our forward line.

One of the cornerstones of our 21 Premiership was the stability and structure of our defence. We built the gameplan around this structure and it was a success. I heard that Goodwin was talking about clearances and that we base a lot of our attack on winning turnovers after possessions out of the clearances and I cannot argue with that given our results but what I would argue is that if that is the case we need to ensure that we have the best people in the best places in defence. To my mind that means rebuilding the defence around May, Lever and Petty as the talls with Salem (when fit and in form), Bowey, Rivers, Hibberd, Brayshaw and McVee as the smaller running defenders. 

Petty back is what is needed at the moment. It seems as if in his absence, there has been a little too much pressure on May to perform and it is to the detriment of his game.

Well we have to discuss the forwards and there is a lot to discuss.

Petty is not the answer to any question regarding the forwards.

JVR out for  couple of weeks.

This leaves a couple of large holes at the pointy end. What to do?

I would try Brown and Schache as the talls for the next couple of weeks with Gawn/Grundy resting there as required. Fristch as a genuine spare medium forward and have Chandler, Spargo, Pickett and ANB as crumbers/harassers at the fall of the ball.

I would have Harmes in the team to cover any tagging roles that crop up during the game. I would have loved Goodwin to pull the trigger on the sub much earlier and get Harmes into the game to tag Anderson yesterday. 

With these suggestions I am not sure what that does to the team selection.

B: Lever, May, Hibberd

HB: Bowey, Petty, Rivers

C: Langdon, Viney, Hunter

HF: ANB, Schache, Chandler

F: Fristch, Brown, Pickett

Fol: Grundy, Petracca, Oliver

I: Gawn, McVee, Sparrow, Harmes/ Jordon (one of these two as sub)

A lot of flexibility and options in that team and all playing primary position to their strengths.

Angus??!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 reasons to keep the faith

1. Our forward half is incredibly unsettled yet the highest scoring in the league.

2. We’ve won all 8 final quarters

3. We’ve got Salem, Spargo, Gawn, Lever, May and others all miss games so far. 

4. We’re second on the ladder with the highest %
 

 

  • Like 5
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@layzie is spot on with regards to our lack of forward line pressure ... another way of looking at it is that we have been excellent in that area previously

As well as that, in other areas of the ground we weren't exerting maximum pressure

And they were exerting pressure with lots of numbers around the contests which often amounted to hurried disposals for our lads

So Gold Coast played a very good game, maybe their best game this season, yet we won the game

To sum up, we didn't bring our best but we didn't play poorly and in the end, we beat their best

Apart from that, if we'd have been more accurate in front of goal, we would have wrapped the game up.  Although, there seemed to be a gusty breeze about which caught hold of the ball occasionally

4 points banked

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, djr said:

"Dire situation" Really? We are the second highest scoring team in the comp. Something must be working. 

Yep. Really. I believe that it is a dire situation with our tall forward mix and has been since the first couple of rounds with the different things we have tried. Need to find a solution and work with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeeZone said:

I like your thinking CHF do you have any influence on the match committee???

Nah. If I did have any influence on those guys there would have been changes a couple of weeks ago.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Not wanting to be all doom and gloom, because I'm glad we got the 4 points, I'll take that any day of the week and generally I think we are playing ok and in a decient position win/loss wise.

BUT I think there are some aspects of our defensive game that are rubbish at the moment.  My recollection of the last two goals that the GC kicked, were the result of some sloppy defending on our behalf close to the goal line that wouldn't have previously got through our once elite backline.

We can talk about bias against us with respects to umpiring decisions and JVR's suspension all we like, but I really hope the coaches and players throughly review that final 5mins of play carefully and we learn some lessons from that.  Goody publicly stated how well we played in the last quarter and generally I'd agree, but in our near capitulation, I think we actually lost our heads a bit and if it wasn't for their rubbish shot on goal in the last minute, we would have had an unfortunate loss.  Against any decient top 8 side and we loose that game.

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2023 at 7:35 PM, DeeSpencer said:

Hunter’s cooked and Grundy’s a headless chook so there goes our recruits from last year.

Fritsch needs a wake up call.

Chandler’s struggling with his leg, had no explosiveness in the second half. 

I thought Oliver had left behind these shocker games in 2020 but he’s had a few this year now.

May and Lever madness bubbling along. Petty could help but he gives no offensive drive and that’s how the ball gets stuck at the wrong end. Disco was really coming in to the game late in the 3rd with some intercept marks, not sure they subbed the right guy.

When a team turns up the pressure and speed and we can’t get the backline set we’re coughing up goals.

And our ball movement just becomes gimmicky or bombing because too few of our players make quick accurate decisions.

And we're 6-2......

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People confuse me sometimes, do they think all the games we win is going to be convincing or something? I read people saying Geelong and Collingwood would bend us over, cause those teams haven't had bad games or games they shouldn't have won. Or we're not playing like a premiership side. Who the f wants to play like a premiership side in May? Top 4 is the goal and then give it a real crack. Please name 1 team who's won all their games convincingly?  Such potatoe cakes out there.

  • Like 5
  • Haha 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JJR said:

People confuse me sometimes, do they think all the games we win is going to be convincing or something? I read people saying Geelong and Collingwood would bend us over, cause those teams haven't had bad games or games they shouldn't have won. Or we're not playing like a premiership side. Who the f wants to play like a premiership side in May? Top 4 is the goal and then give it a real crack. Please name 1 team who's won all their games convincingly?  Such potatoe cakes out there.

I like potato cakes.....

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, JJR said:

People confuse me sometimes, do they think all the games we win is going to be convincing or something? I read people saying Geelong and Collingwood would bend us over, cause those teams haven't had bad games or games they shouldn't have won. Or we're not playing like a premiership side. Who the f wants to play like a premiership side in May? Top 4 is the goal and then give it a real crack. Please name 1 team who's won all their games convincingly?  Such potatoe cakes out there.

That's right, do what we have to do to qualify for the tournament then bring your best. Pretty happy to fly under the radar right now collecting wins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Mel Bourne said:

Not impossible, but again, surprisingly difficult. 
 

Any questions would obviously need to be audible to any would-be transcribers, who would more than likely need to be operating from within the broadcast control-room. So again, you’d need microphones everywhere conveying that information. 
 

Or, you put the transcriber on a laptop in the conference room, and just hope that they can hear everything well enough to transcribe to air in real-time. Again, very challenging. 

There has to be simple solutions to a rather silly problem.

How about each journalist is invited and they write their best question on paper....If it is accepted the 3 or 4 journalists step forward closer to microphone to ask their questions when required.

As it is... do they just randomly pick reporters to ask the question and place them in random corners of the room.....Has always been messy part of the game that seems to not be an issue within other sports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #39 Koltyn Tholstrop

    The first round draft pick at #13 from twelve months ago the strongly built medium forward has had an impressive introduction to AFL football and is expected to spend more midfield moments as his career progresses. Date of Birth: 25 July 2005 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 10 Goals MFC 2024: 5 Career Total: 5 Games CDFC 2024: 7 Goals CDFC 2024: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 6

    2024 Player Reviews: #42 Daniel Turner

    The move of “Disco” to a key forward post looks like bearing fruit. Turner has good hands, moves well and appears to be learning the forward craft well. Will be an interesting watch in 2025. Date of Birth: January 28, 2002 Height: 195cm Games MFC 2024: 15 Career Total: 18 Goals MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 17 Games CDFC 2024: 1 Goals CDFC 2024:  1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9

    2024 Player Reviews: #8 Jake Lever

    The Demon’s key defender and backline leader had his share of injuries and niggles throughout the season which prevented him from performing at his peak.  Date of Birth: 5 March 1996 Height: 195cm Games MFC 2024: 18 Career Total: 178 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 5

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 1

    2024 Player Reviews: #13 Clayton Oliver

    Lack of preparation after a problematic preseason prevented Oliver from reaching the high standards set before last year’s hamstring woes. He carried injury right through the back half of the season and was controversially involved in a potential move during the trade period that was ultimately shut down by the club. Date of Birth:  22 July 1997 Height:  189cm Games MFC 2024:  21 Career Total: 183 Goals MFC 2024: 3 Career Total: 54 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 10

    BLOODY BLUES by Meggs

    The conclusion to Narrm’s home and away season was the inevitable let down by the bloody Blues  who meekly capitulated to the Bombers.   The 2024 season fixture handicapped the Demons chances from the get-go with Port Adelaide, Brisbane and Essendon advantaged with enough gimme games to ensure a tough road to the finals, especially after a slew of early season injuries to star players cost wins and percentage.     As we strode confidently through the gates of Prin

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    2024 Player Reviews: #5 Christian Petracca

    Melbourne’s most important player who dominated the first half of the season until his untimely injury in the Kings Birthday clash put an end to his season. At the time, he was on his way to many personal honours and the club in strong finals contention. When the season did end for Melbourne and Petracca was slowly recovering, he was engulfed in controversy about a possible move of clubs amid claims about his treatment by the club in the immediate aftermath of his injury. Date of Birth: 4 J

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 21

    2024 Player Reviews: #2 Jacob van Rooyen

    Strong marking youngster who plays forward and relief ruck, continued to make significant strides forward in his career path. The Demons have high hopes for van Rooyen as he stakes his claim to become an elite attacking forward. Date of Birth: 16 April 2003 Height: 193cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 41 Goals MFC 2024: 30 Career Total: 58 Brownlow Medal Votes: 1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 32

    LIVE AND LET DIE by Meggs

    The Demons’ impressive late season charge to finals will most likely come unstuck this Saturday evening when the Bombers blow up the also-ran Blues in the Ikon Park double-header.   To mangle McCartney, what does it matter to ya? To have any chance to play next week Narrm has got a job to do and needs to do it well.  We’ve got to give the Pie sheilas hell, say live and let die! It’s Indigenous Round for this game and the chance to celebrate and engage with Aboriginal and Torres

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    2024 Player Reviews: #32 Tom Sparrow

    Had to shoulder more responsibility as the club’s injury concerns deepened but needs to step up more as he closes in on 100 games. Date of Birth: 31 May 2000 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 95 Goals MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 34 Games CDFC: 1 Goals CDFL: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 24
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...