Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

On news reports it sounded like he may not have got the contract renewal he wanted.

Despite their 2016 premiership and 2021 GF they haven't been a consistent finals team.  Also, last year wasn't his best in the media. 

Will always be their hero but could quickly become 'yesterday's man'.  Reckon he needs to regularly make top 4 and contend in at least a few PF's in the next 3 years to keep his job.

His reputation is all based on 2 incredible finals runs, but given he has never once coached them to the Top 4, is he really as good as some in the media want us to believe?  I don't think so.  I think he tries too hard to be edgy and it will catch up with him if he can't get more out of his talented list.

  • Like 3

Posted
On 3/7/2023 at 4:55 PM, DEE fence said:

Very torn about team selection, watched the practice match back, Harmes worthy of playing but then Chandler found space (not that they are in for the same spot) but I like Kozzie as a mid more than Harmes. I also think Hibbo should be a spare and we need to blood some others, Hibbi is ace and there is a role for him this year but we have to give some new players a go after a few seasons. ANB looked in wonderful touch. I wasn't completely convinced with Tmac mobility though, and I would understand if the coaches take a different approach between bBB and Tmac JVR. Sorry for the stream of consciousness type post, just really can't pick how the team is going to or should look, many people have made a case for playing.

They call it the Brodie Butterfly Affect

  • Haha 1

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Vipercrunch said:

His reputation is all based on 2 incredible finals runs, but given he has never once coached them to the Top 4, is he really as good as some in the media want us to believe?  I don't think so.  I think he tries too hard to be edgy and it will catch up with him if he can't get more out of his talented list.

I agree.  I have always thought they fluked the 2016 flag.  Good on them.

Without that he would be long gone.  Since then they have yo-yoed in and out of the 8 with a good 2021 to make the GF and get smashed.  Otherwise, no top 4 and no consistency in reaching or progressing thru the finals.

Edited by Lucifers Hero
  • Like 4
Posted

I would put Schache in straight away against his old side, with Hunter of course.

  • Like 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I agree.  I have always thought they fluked the 2016 flag.  Good on them.

Without that he would be long gone.  Since then they have yo-yoed in and out of the 8 with a good 2021 to make the GF and get smashed.  Otherwise, no top 4 and no consistency in reaching or progressing thru the finals.

Not to mention finals fails in 2015, 2020 and 2022 that were very winnable. 

  • Like 1

Posted
23 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Can't disagree.  The bulldogs have only a handful of 'impact' players or players that regularly and consistently hurt the opp:  Bontempelli, Smith, Naughton and maybe Libertore who will soon be 31.  As mentioned elsewhere, their midfield is no longer elite imv. 

Then they have a stack of young highly talented players with potential whose impact will wax and wane during the season.  I include English in this group.  I also put Treloar in this group as he is often injured.  Of course, each and every one of them will have some games where they star but I doubt they can put enough together to succeed.

The challenge for them is getting the max from the two groups of players while trying to build on field cohesion after all the list and position changes in the off season. 

Interesting that Beveridge chose to not play a scratch match.  Bound to have something up his sleeve.  Maybe they did a bit of experimenting but I see a need for them to experiment a lot more with their position changes and cohesion.

Doubt they will make the 8.  We will beat them round 1.

I don't agree. I think the Dogs' best 22 going into 2023 is better than it was in 2022.

They've lost Dunkley, which is a major loss, but the Dogs are probably the only side in the league who can lose a midfielder of that quality and cover it - they had over-invested in their midfield in 2022.

Their midfield still has Bontempelli, Macrae, Treloar, Smith and Libba whilst they're now working Caleb Daniel and his elite kicking through there too. Their forward line now has height and instead of Josh Bruce as the second tall they've got Lobb and Darcy to spread the load (I don't rate Ugle-Hagan highly but he gets to be a bit of a Fritsch-style forward there). Whilst down back they've added Liam Jones who from all reports continues to be more than capable at AFL level despite his year out.

I think there are better sides holistically (Geelong, Brisbane and us) but I think the Dogs are more likely to make top 4 than they are to miss the finals.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Watched a replay of the dogs game.

I thought they were very fumbley and made lots of mistakes with their ball  movement (kicking to contests,  and choosing the wrong corridor).

They will be better for run.

Where as we looked ready for "it".

Bont and McCrea are the dangers. Will, Rivers step up as a stopper, along with Harmes? 

It will be a good game. Just hope we can finish them off "if" we get on top and get a great 3rd quarter in. 

Edited by kev martin
  • Like 2

Posted

Was just told the boys are about to run out at Gosch’s. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I agree.  I have always thought they fluked the 2016 flag.  Good on them.

Without that he would be long gone.  Since then they have yo-yoed in and out of the 8 with a good 2021 to make the GF and get smashed.  Otherwise, no top 4 and no consistency in reaching or progressing thru the finals.

Couldn't see Goodwin going into the 2029 season with Bevo's record over the 7 years since their flag including this year if the Dogs don't make finals. Surely goneski?

  • Like 2

Posted

Despite the perception that we have the stronger list, I definitely see this game as a 50/50 affair. You only need to look back at the recent meetings between the two clubs from 2020 onwards - it's a 3-3 split.

Just when you thought we had the wood over them with early season wins (2021 and 2022) and the grand final, they come back and beat us in the return game of seasons 2021 and 2022. They also beat us in 2020 despite us being in better form at the time.

In terms of changes from the selected 23 I see Laurie and Woey both making way, but the latter looked like he could handle the tempo of an AFL game and can see him featuring in the seniors during the season.

Two out of Fritta, Viney, Jordon and Hibberd will come in for Laurie and Woey depending on availability.

I think Chandler and McVee will retain their spots. The lineup gelled really well Vs' Richmond so you'd imagine changes will be at a minimum.

Can't wait for the game, and can't wait to see us playing improved footy at our ground.

 

 

 

  • Like 6
Posted
10 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Despite the perception that we have the stronger list, I definitely see this game as a 50/50 affair. You only need to look back at the recent meetings between the two clubs from 2020 onwards - it's a 3-3 split.

Just when you thought we had the wood over them with early season wins (2021 and 2022) and the grand final, they come back and beat us in the return game of seasons 2021 and 2022. They also beat us in 2020 despite us being in better form at the time.

In terms of changes from the selected 23 I see Laurie and Woey both making way, but the latter looked like he could handle the tempo of an AFL game and can see him featuring in the seniors during the season.

Two out of Fritta, Viney, Jordon and Hibberd will come in for Laurie and Woey depending on availability.

I think Chandler and McVee will retain their spots. The lineup gelled really well Vs' Richmond so you'd imagine changes will be at a minimum.

Can't wait for the game, and can't wait to see us playing improved footy at our ground.

 

 

 

Agree. I think Chandler gives us a new edge and McVee to slot in across half back. Gonna be a beauty can't wait as well!

  • Like 3

Posted
57 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

You realised he kicked 3 goals and looked to be a viable option throughout the game?

He dropped a few marks, got beaten for every hit out he went for and while I hold him in the highest regard - his absence hurt us immensely last year - I think it's time to blood the Van Man.

I wasn't all that impressed by Brown either.

I love Chandler but he doesn't do enough at this level. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I agree.  I have always thought they fluked the 2016 flag.  Good on them.

Without that he would be long gone.  Since then they have yo-yoed in and out of the 8 with a good 2021 to make the GF and get smashed.  Otherwise, no top 4 and no consistency in reaching or progressing thru the finals.

But we were exactly the same when The Reverend was Coaching us. 
The Dogs have always lacked 1-2 Key Players as Melbourne did under both Northey and ND. 

I think Beveridge has done a pretty solid job. 
 

Let’s watch Lyon and Clarkson coach Ordinary Players and see how well they adapt 

  • Like 3

Posted
5 hours ago, NeveroddoreveN said:

Curious re Fritsch!  He has not trained for like 3-4 weeks now?  So many have him in the team....surely he is not remotely prepared for a hitout like this?

CHandler i think has to stay within the team....He kicked 1.3 and had hands in several others.  He had a better game then Tmac/BB imo and does not deserve to get dropped for narrowly missing a few shots.

Thought TMac was pretty solid, always been a fan of BBB but he's starting to worry me.

  • Like 1

Posted
5 hours ago, NeveroddoreveN said:

Curious re Fritsch!  He has not trained for like 3-4 weeks now?  So many have him in the team....surely he is not remotely prepared for a hitout like this?

CHandler i think has to stay within the team....He kicked 1.3 and had hands in several others.  He had a better game then Tmac/BB imo and does not deserve to get dropped for narrowly missing a few shots.

Yep, he was one of the stand-outs for the Dees against Richmond - very busy with teaming, possessions and forward movement, and very unlucky to miss a few. I watched him closely in the game warm-up at Casey and he really impressed with about six consecutive shots at goal going through the big sticks midway - from about 55m out, well beyond the forward arc. Distance, no problem. Accuracy, surprisingly good. Height through the goalposts, excellent. Confidence and encouragement to 'take the shot' is all that is required with this young bloke. 

  • Like 4
Posted
40 minutes ago, Monbon said:

He dropped a few marks, got beaten for every hit out he went for and while I hold him in the highest regard - his absence hurt us immensely last year - I think it's time to blood the Van Man.

I wasn't all that impressed by Brown either.

I love Chandler but he doesn't do enough at this level. 

Fair enough. I saw T Mac's game differently and was considering putting him in the hypothetical "Demonland" votes.

I agree Brown was poor until the last quarter, and looks half the player he was compared to his peak North years when he was banging home 60 goals a season. I'd still play him as he takes a key opponent away from T Mac, Fritta and the resting ruck and his long range set shots are like rolled gold.

Your man JVR will get his opportunity. BBB and T Mac won't play all games.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

In preparation of his new contract signing .

  • Haha 1

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    2024 Player Reviews: #15 Ed Langdon

    The Demon running machine came back with a vengeance after a leaner than usual year in 2023.  Date of Birth: 1 February 1996 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 22 Career Total: 179 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 76 Brownlow Medal Votes: 5 Melbourne Football Club: 5th Best & Fairest: 352 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 6

    2024 Player Reviews: #24 Trent Rivers

    The premiership defender had his best year yet as he was given the opportunity to move into the midfield and made a good fist of it. Date of Birth: 30 July 2001 Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 100 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total:  9 Brownlow Medal Votes: 7 Melbourne Football Club: 6th Best & Fairest: 350 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 2

    TRAINING: Monday 11th November 2024

    Veteran Demonland Trackwatchers Kev Martin, Slartibartfast & Demon Wheels were on hand at Gosch's Paddock to kick off the official first training session for the 1st to 4th year players with a few elder statesmen in attendance as well. KEV MARTIN'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Beautiful morning. Joy all round, they look like they want to be there.  21 in the squad. Looks like the leadership group is TMac, Viney Chandler and Petty. They look like they have sli

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    2024 Player Reviews: #1 Steven May

    The years are rolling by but May continued to be rock solid in a key defensive position despite some injury concerns. He showed great resilience in coming back from a nasty rib injury and is expected to continue in that role for another couple of seasons. Date of Birth: 10 January 1992 Height: 193cm Games MFC 2024: 19 Career Total: 235 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 24 Melbourne Football Club: 9th Best & Fairest: 316 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons

    2024 Player Reviews: #4 Judd McVee

    It was another strong season from McVee who spent most of his time mainly at half back but he also looked at home on a few occasions when he was moved into the midfield. There could be more of that in 2025. Date of Birth: 7 August 2003 Height: 185cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 48 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 1 Brownlow Medal Votes: 1 Melbourne Football Club: 7th Best & Fairest: 347 votes

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #31 Bayley Fritsch

    Once again the club’s top goal scorer but he had a few uncharacteristic flat spots during the season and the club will be looking for much better from him in 2025. Date of Birth: 6 December 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 23 Career Total: 149 Goals MFC 2024: 41 Career Total: 252 Brownlow Medal Votes: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9

    2024 Player Reviews: #18 Jake Melksham

    After sustaining a torn ACL in the final match of the 2023 season Jake added a bit to the attack late in the 2024 season upon his return. He has re-signed on to the Demons for 1 more season in 2025. Date of Birth: 12 August 1991 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 229 Goals MFC 2024: 8 Career Total: 188

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7

    2024 Player Reviews: #3 Christian Salem

    The luckless Salem suffered a hamstring injury against the Lions early in the season and, after missing a number of games, he was never at his best. He was also inconvenienced by minor niggles later in the season. This was a blow for the club that sorely needed him to fill gaps in the midfield at times as well as to do his best work in defence. Date of Birth: 15 July 1995 Height: 184cm Games MFC 2024: 17 Career Total: 176 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 26 Brownlow Meda

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #39 Koltyn Tholstrop

    The first round draft pick at #13 from twelve months ago the strongly built medium forward has had an impressive introduction to AFL football and is expected to spend more midfield moments as his career progresses. Date of Birth: 25 July 2005 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 10 Career Total: 10 Goals MFC 2024: 5 Career Total: 5 Games CDFC 2024: 7 Goals CDFC 2024: 4

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...