Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted
1 minute ago, dees189227 said:

I'm still surprised Neale got a vote against us in the final round 

Neale got a vote with only 21 possies against us (equal 9th best) in a 10 goal loss

  • Like 4
Posted

Hate to be one of those people but definitely felt rigged.

Got off from suspension and polls in the last round, 3 votes, when he wasn't even close to it. Daicos best on by a mile.

Also polled 3 vs Adelaide when they got absolutely destroyed.

Bizarre outcome.

  • Like 6

Posted

Magnifying glasses out on the appeal process please. Right up until Thurs night they were working this one out while the teams for the next week had been announced. It's a joke 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Swooper1987 said:

Not a vote for May or Fritsch.  Bizarre

Not that unusual though, forwards or backs don't get votes, has been 30 years since a non midfielder won (Scott Wynd)

  • Like 1

Posted
2 minutes ago, The Lobster Effect said:

Neale got a vote with only 21 possies against us (equal 9th best) in a 10 goal loss

Neal didn't think he would poll either!!

  • Like 2
Posted

Fuggin [censored] result AFL HANG YOUR HEADS IN SHAME 

TAINTED RESULT SHOULD HAVE BEEN INELIGIBLE

AFL knew what was up

Crap

  • Like 3
  • Love 1

Posted
Just now, Jaded No More said:

Tonight just proves that the world hates gingers, and I for one feel personally victimized. 

Tonight was discrimination on so many different levels..

Posted
57 minutes ago, darkhorse72 said:

Freo Bradshaw didn't have the best finish o the season.

Neale as pointed out ha no competition in the midfield, its him and daylight at the lions.

Oliver still may, he had a great finish to the season, even in our losses. 

 

That's just not true. Neale has to contend with Jarrod 'Please don't hurt me Clayton' Berry.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

CLAYTON was discriminated against in many games 35 pos NO VOTES

Cripps win a joke

Edited by picket fence
  • Angry 1

Posted

Voss the ultimate team player had a very interesting look on his face.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Stiff Arm said:

To be fair, Tracc scored very highly as well. Probably becomes hard for umpires to choose between them. I'm just happy with those two having an outstanding year

And it’s going to really make either of them winning one difficult.

Maybe they should instead aim for the Norm Smiths. 

  • Like 2

Posted
7 minutes ago, The Lobster Effect said:

Not that unusual though, forwards or backs don't get votes, has been 30 years since a non midfielder won (Scott Wynd)

Was good seeing Jeremy Cameron poll well. Not meaning to be pro-cat just pro-votes for non-midfielders aha

  • Like 2

Posted
15 minutes ago, layzie said:

I wouldn't have begrudged Cripps a brownlow in his career but this season didn't seem right. Thought he dropped off a bit and the non suspension sucked 

Anyone who went to the pre season game and witnessed Cripps absolutely destroy us would have seen that he had got his body right and was in for a huge season.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, picket fence said:

Cripps is an arrogant and irrelevent person

Doesn't come across as arrogant. Maybe we could have had him to speak to LJ about living in Melbourne and dealing with it

  • Like 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, layzie said:

There's no way this brownlow was above board, there's just no way. Please start the investigation now, we'll stay with this all night if we have to.

Agree. How much would it cost for an official investigation? 

Cripps would even acknowledge within himself that he did not deserve that. 

What a stitch-up. They even gave Neale 1 vote in the last game to make it appear closer. can think of 8-9 players that deserved a vote before Neale. 

Joke. 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, The Lobster Effect said:

Neale got a vote with only 21 possies against us (equal 9th best) in a 10 goal loss

My impression was the same. However, Neale actually got 29 possessions (2nd most on the field) and the highest AFL Fantasy Points on the ground (whatever that means).

Still, the game was set up in the 1st half and surely with an 11 goal lead at half time, Melbourne players should have been 3/2/1 in that game.

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...