Jump to content

Featured Replies

This would be the first time I can remember looking at the games in the first week of the finals and thinking there’s not really one certainty to win there match. Should be a good finals series.

 
Just now, ANG13 said:

This would be the first time I can remember looking at the games in the first week of the finals and thinking there’s not really one certainty to win there match. Should be a good finals series.

Richmond will destroy Brisbane and I think Freo will do the same to the Dogs. 
The other 2 games are 50/50

 
9 minutes ago, old dee said:

Oh hell another bloody night game! 

I hear you but anyone , anywhere and anytime!

We must make sure our players in every final they play in that they have an overwhelming level of support coming their way.

We owe it to them

Edited by Wodjathefirst

Just now, Dr. Gonzo said:

Genuinely surprised Geelong/Collingwood isn't the Friday night game

I think too hard for Geelong fans to get in on time.

Given they don’t get a home game (haha!), it’s only fair to make it easier on the supporters.  


Thank the lord above and beyond we got Friday and didn't cop the Thurs 

5 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Richmond will destroy Brisbane and I think Freo will do the same to the Dogs. 
The other 2 games are 50/50

You could be right and I certainly hope Fremantle pump the Dogs but I think the Dogs best beats Fremantle. I think Richmond will probably beat the Lions but don’t think they will thrash them. The Lions were made to look a lot worse than they actually are by a very good team on Friday. 

So a reminder that with the Dogs replacing Carlton in the finals, we had 4 double-up games against the top 8. By comparison, the Dogs had 3, Geelong, Sydney, Collingwood, Fremantle and Brisbane all had 1, and Richmond had 0.

We finished 2nd despite playing literally half our season against finalists (11 games against the 7 other finalists, 11 games against the bottom 10). Fair effort IMO.

On the flipside, 5 of the 7 finalists (i.e. all bar Richmond and Brisbane) beat us this year. Which is funny given they'll be our semi final opponents should we lose to Sydney. But otherwise, our QF and, if we make it, our PF opponent and likely our GF opponent will have had a win over us.

 

The byes finished in Round 14, so everyone played 9 games from Round 15 to Round 23. Of those 9 games, 6 of ours were against finalists, and we went 3-3.

Compare that with everyone else:

  1. Melbourne: 6 games, 3-3
  2. Bulldogs: 5 games, 1-4
  3. Fremantle: 4 games, 1-1-2
  4. Brisbane: 4 games, 1-3
  5. Geelong: 3 games, 3-0
  6. Richmond: 3 games, 1-1-1
  7. Sydney: 3 games, 3-0
  8. Collingwood: 2 games, 1-1

Geelong and Sydney the only others with winning records, but they played half the number we did.

It perhaps shouldn't be too surprising that the four finalists sitting at the bottom of that list are the four considered to have been in the best post-bye form: Geelong, Collingwood, Sydney and Richmond.

Edited by titan_uranus

46 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Genuinely surprised Geelong/Collingwood isn't the Friday night game

I think the AFL has decided to follow human decency by not allowing feral rabid animals out late at night.


52 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Such good doctors that they got fined for breaching Covid protocols. Zero chance he doesn’t get up. 

Whoops I totally forgot about that! Sorry! They’ll cheat for sure!

Well we got lucky with the best fixture. If we lose we have an extra day break on our opposition. 
And we don’t have to play on Thursday night

1 hour ago, ANG13 said:

This would be the first time I can remember looking at the games in the first week of the finals and thinking there’s not really one certainty to win there match. Should be a good finals series.

Yeah good mix of teams. Would be good for the neutral.

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

I think too hard for Geelong fans to get in on time.

Given they don’t get a home game (haha!), it’s only fair to make it easier on the supporters.  

I hear that but channel 7 have never cared about such things in the past.

1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

The byes finished in Round 14, so everyone played 9 games from Round 15 to Round 23. Of those 9 games, 6 of ours were against finalists, and we went 3-3.

Compare that with everyone else:

  1. Melbourne: 6 games, 3-3
  2. Bulldogs: 5 games, 1-4
  3. Fremantle: 4 games, 1-1-2
  4. Brisbane: 4 games, 1-3
  5. Geelong: 3 games, 3-0
  6. Richmond: 3 games, 1-1-1
  7. Sydney: 3 games, 3-0
  8. Collingwood: 2 games, 1-1

Geelong and Sydney the only others with winning records, but they played half the number we did.

It perhaps shouldn't be too surprising that the four finalists sitting at the bottom of that list are the four considered to have been in the best post-bye form: Geelong, Collingwood, Sydney and Richmond.

The draw has helped Geelong and Sydney immensely. We have been shown no favours whatsoever.

All good looking forward to Friday week.

 


7 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

The draw has helped Geelong and Sydney immensely. We have been shown no favours whatsoever.

All good looking forward to Friday week.

 

But we managed to get to where we want to be. Top two. Max Gawn said it was almost like finals nearly every game since our Clayton’s bye.

Edited by John Crow Batty

8 hours ago, DubDee said:

Well we got lucky with the best fixture. If we lose we have an extra day break on our opposition. 
And we don’t have to play on Thursday night

If we lose we play the winner of Tigers/Brisbane, so have 1 day less break.

But they have to travel, either after the first game or before the semi. So it probably evens out.

8 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I hear that but channel 7 have never cared about such things in the past.

And never will in the future Dr.

12 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

I think too hard for Geelong fans to get in on time.

Given they don’t get a home game (haha!), it’s only fair to make it easier on the supporters.  

Glad they took that into consideration for us in the Thurs night game this year Jaded 😛

2 hours ago, old dee said:

And never will in the future Dr.

Hopefully they won't get a say in the near future


33 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Hopefully they won't get a say in the near future

It would appear that no one else is really interested in paying the price needed to move it away from them Dr. Or am I miss reading the situation. I cannot see any future broadcaster having anything but the ratings as their first, second and last consideration. Sadly we have sold our souls to the media. 

Edited by old dee

I'm all for geelong being allowed to play there first final at skilled stadium. Come on gill let them and watch the ferals go wild

 
On 8/21/2022 at 9:32 PM, mrtwister said:

And as a reward for finishing first, Geelong get to play away to the fourth placed Collingwood.

FMD

 

On 8/21/2022 at 9:51 PM, Dr. Gonzo said:

Genuinely surprised Geelong/Collingwood isn't the Friday night game

Well IF they were to play at Geelong’s home ground Collingwood would have to default as they wouldn’t know how to get there. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 172 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 435 replies