I just wanted to get to 1,000 posts

21 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

I just wanted to get to 1,000 posts

I can see why.

34 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

I can see why.

Can you?

Can you really?

13 hours ago, jumbo returns said:

Can you?

Can you really?

No.

Just watched the "Gettable" podcast.

In terms of the Dees 1st pick, Cal said we would wait to see who was left out of:

Curtin / Sanders / Watson.

He also said we would have an eye on Caddy (as he is a forward) and Windsor (who he described as the "flyer").

6 hours ago, 2021 said:

Just watched the "Gettable" podcast.

In terms of the Dees 1st pick, Cal said we would wait to see who was left out of:

Curtin / Sanders / Watson.

He also said we would have an eye on Caddy (as he is a forward) and Windsor (who he described as the "flyer").

Also, Cal thought pick 1 would be traded to North. This would mean WC would be taking Curtin, which would leave us with Sanders or Watson. That would be a great result at our first pick, and I would expect it to be Sanders.

2 minutes ago, 2021 said:

Also, Cal thought pick 1 would be traded to North. This would mean WC would be taking Curtin, which would leave us with Sanders or Watson. That would be a great result at our first pick, and I would expect it to be Sanders.

No Leake?

1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

No Leake?

not under tim lamb

1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

No Leake?

Didn’t mention Leake, in regards to our first pick

Edited November 1, 20232 yr by 2021

In all I’ve taken in (mostly from Cal Twomey and the like) we seem to be sitting in the bottom of the first two batches. 
top 6 of Reid duursma and mcKercher, curtin watson and sanders 

then next grouping is caddy Leake o Sullivan Windsor and Wilson. 
 

If all is out of our control and we walk away with Sanders and Wilson then we’ve done alright. Nothing wrong with either pick and both should work out fine. But to me it just feels too vanilla (off topic:very underrated flavour) 

I just have the feeling sanders isn’t a good Melbourne fit and will get the James Jordan treatment of waiting for something to go wrong with our all star centre square squad, none of which are close to finished. 
 

If there isn’t a slider presented to us then personally I’d prefer Leake or O Sullivan at 6. Might be a stretch but I see both as better needs picks and would rather choose for list balance than for top end talent. 

6 minutes ago, The end is nigh said:

In all I’ve taken in (mostly from Cal Twomey and the like) we seem to be sitting in the bottom of the first two batches. 
top 6 of Reid duursma and mcKercher, curtin watson and sanders 

then next grouping is caddy Leake o Sullivan Windsor and Wilson. 
 

If all is out of our control and we walk away with Sanders and Wilson then we’ve done alright. Nothing wrong with either pick and both should work out fine. But to me it just feels too vanilla (off topic:very underrated flavour) 

I just have the feeling sanders isn’t a good Melbourne fit and will get the James Jordan treatment of waiting for something to go wrong with our all star centre square squad, none of which are close to finished. 
 

If there isn’t a slider presented to us then personally I’d prefer Leake or O Sullivan at 6. Might be a stretch but I see both as better needs picks and would rather choose for list balance than for top end talent. 

Feel like there ain’t no Bailey Humphrey at pick 6 in this draft unfortunately 

I think we wait and see who slips through to our first pick. We could be pleasantly surprised. If not, we still have options. We should be fine at 6, and I'm sure we had a good plan when we traded up to 11.

3 hours ago, The end is nigh said:

In all I’ve taken in (mostly from Cal Twomey and the like) we seem to be sitting in the bottom of the first two batches. 
top 6 of Reid duursma and mcKercher, curtin watson and sanders 

then next grouping is caddy Leake o Sullivan Windsor and Wilson. 
 

If all is out of our control and we walk away with Sanders and Wilson then we’ve done alright. Nothing wrong with either pick and both should work out fine. But to me it just feels too vanilla (off topic:very underrated flavour) 

I just have the feeling sanders isn’t a good Melbourne fit and will get the James Jordan treatment of waiting for something to go wrong with our all star centre square squad, none of which are close to finished. 
 

If there isn’t a slider presented to us then personally I’d prefer Leake or O Sullivan at 6. Might be a stretch but I see both as better needs picks and would rather choose for list balance than for top end talent. 

Adelaide are the club showing most interest to Darcy Wilson and could grab him at pick 10.

40 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Adelaide are the club showing most interest to Darcy Wilson and could grab him at pick 10.

Any word on where O'Sullivan might land dazzle? I'm hoping he's there for us at pick 11.

46 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Adelaide are the club showing most interest to Darcy Wilson and could grab him at pick 10.

Seems a bit of a reach at 10.

A good number of Tassie prospects this year. Liking the look of Schoenmaker, has an amazing left foot kick, nice size about him too 194cm

Cal T. said you start to find out more about who’s taking who, around Cup day.

28 minutes ago, 2021 said:

Cal T. said you start to find out more about who’s taking who, around Cup day.

It's quite amazing how much 'filler' time they do with that gettable show.

Non-stop talking all year round....

20 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

It's quite amazing how much 'filler' time they do with that gettable show.

Non-stop talking all year round....

Yeah it’s good this time of year though. Best source of accurate information about the draft.

On the draft night when it comes to our pick 11, can we swap it for someone elses future pick. And could we for instance at our turn, swap our pick 11 plus our future 1st or 2nd to say Hawthorn for their future 1st?

Im not asking is it good value, I merely want to know if it is allowed.

2 minutes ago, Damo said:

On the draft night when it comes to our pick 11, can we swap it for someone elses future pick. And could we for instance at our turn, swap our pick 11 plus our future 1st or 2nd to say Hawthorn for their future 1st?

Im not asking is it good value, I merely want to know if it is allowed.

Yep, providing all of that happens before the earliest current selection being utilised has been utilised.

Edited November 3, 20232 yr by ChaserJ

Just now, ChaserJ said:

Yep, providing all of that happens before Hawthorn make that selection.

Im talking about their 1st choice next yesr.

Re-read your question @Damo and updated my reply.

Edited November 3, 20232 yr by ChaserJ

6 & 11, for me , like to see any two of Curtin, Sanders, Leake, O’Sullivan, (Darcy) Wilson, Windsor or Murphy.  

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

6 & 11, for me , like to see any two of Curtin, Sanders, Leake, O’Sullivan, (Darcy) Wilson, Windsor or Murphy.  

I’m swaying towards Schoenmacher as pick 11 if we take a mid with pick 6 and O’Sullivan is off the board. 
194 not considered KPD but looks to me like one who has some brutality about how he goes about it and love that left foot