Jump to content

Featured Replies

Behinds, behinds, behinds, a real worry!

One day we are going to be beaten by a team scoring 5 goals: 0 behinds to our 0 goals: 29 behinds (or similar).
 

 
11 minutes ago, Dee Dee said:

Behinds, behinds, behinds, a real worry!

One day we are going to be beaten by a team scoring 5 goals: 0 behinds to our 0 goals: 29 behinds (or similar).
 

Lol no we won't! We'll still keep them to 3 goals, 10 points.

1 hour ago, rpfc said:

Coz it’s Steven effing May…

Correct.

When you are the best FB in the league by the length of the Flemington straight, it's ok if you make a mistake.

Also the correlation between May making mistakes and Smith being in the side are not lost on anyone. 

 

Just had a look back at the stats, Clayton is a genuine beast!

Thought dunstan worked his way into the game nicely as well, great depth going forward.

Go Dees!!  

Yeah pretty scary that we can have a night like that and still hold the opposition to 54 points. Credit to the structure and non-stop running all night.


In his press conf Goodwin spoke about Weideman.  One comment was that he took his opportunities.  He said a significant point was when we were 4.16 and the pressure was on the next player having a shot.  Weideman was that player.  He absorbed the pressure and slotted it. 

Nailing a goal under pressure like that is another big step in his development.

Regardless of what folks think his faults are I doubt he is being dropped any time soon.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

6 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

In his press conf Goodwin spoke about Weideman.  One comment was that he took his opportunities.  He said a significant point was when we were 4.16 and the pressure was on the next player having a shot.  Weideman was that player.  He absorbed the pressure and slotted it. 

Nailing a goal under pressure like that is another big step in his development.

Regardless of what folks think his faults are I doubt he is being dropped any time soon.

That’s one improvement in his game. A couple of years ago he would have missed it.

4 hours ago, pineapple dee said:

Any time in the last 30 years that a team scored the first 2 goals of the game against us, I would think it was ' Game over ' 

I don't think that any more !!

 

These days I expect it

 
On 4/25/2022 at 2:51 PM, old dee said:

If he was drafted at 49 and called Sam Smith he would gone by now.

That's complete bs old dee. You honestly think he is still on the list only because he was pick 9 and is a Weideman? You think Goody et al are that shallow?

The fact he's now contibuting and the FD dropped Tmac for him shows his value

It's still early days. Let's see how the season pans out

3 hours ago, durango said:

I have watched the replay and ANB kicking and disposal was poor he had at least 4 getable shots at goal.

Some on this site have criticised J Smith for his handball to Lynch yet when other players have a poor handall like May in the 3rd quarter resulting in a Riewoldt goal nothing was said.

Runs on the board mate


24 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

In his press conf Goodwin spoke about Weideman.  One comment was that he took his opportunities.  He said a significant point was when we were 4.16 and the pressure was on the next player having a shot.  Weideman was that player.  He absorbed the pressure and slotted it. 

Nailing a goal under pressure like that is another big step in his development.

Regardless of what folks think his faults are I doubt he is being dropped any time soon.

I thought that ta the time too - big pressure goal considering the number of misses to that point. We then kicked 3 or so goals in the next few minutes and iced the game.

17 hours ago, old dee said:

And he is now very liable with set shots. 

Yes OD have noticed his preparation is now a well timed method. Dare i say that unit that plays at FF for Cats.

When you get the big boys saying how hard to match up on.

And OD, Weideman got a good left foot too..

I think the Anzac Eve game is now the highlight of this round. The night ceremony is so atmospheric and moving with the flame and lights in the crowd. Well done to the organisers and the participants. Hopefully we have it long term.

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

In his press conf Goodwin spoke about Weideman.  One comment was that he took his opportunities.  He said a significant point was when we were 4.16 and the pressure was on the next player having a shot.  Weideman was that player.  He absorbed the pressure and slotted it. 

Yes. I gave a big thumbs up to Weideman then. (I hope he will treasure that.) At a time when it seemed like goals were impossible, where even a player running into an open goal might manage to stub their toe and have the ball roll out of bounds, Weideman nailed the pressure shot. Well done Weid. Now take 9 grabs next week and kick 6.1

6-0 to start out defence of the flag I will take in any season. Just as I will enjoy getting the 4 points in any H&A game.

Did I find it frustrating to see so many gettable goals turned into points? I sure did but on replay I managed to put that aspect of the game aside and watch the way we controlled the game building on a rock solid defence and moving the ball well through the midfield. Always looked to be winners. I also think that the players and coaches will learn a lot from that game as the Tiges look to be in damage control from the very early stages of the game and looked to keep numbers behind the ball and not allow us any space to work in in our forward 50. 

A couple of critical players missing out through H&S protocols and we slotted in a couple of others on the list and the team just accepted what it was on got on with the game.

Smith and Dunstan were both more than adequate during the game And have given the list a boost with regard to depth. With just 3 on the injury list at the moment we have unrivaled quality depth available to cover any requirements.

Enjoyed the games from Oliver, Langdon, Jordon, Sparrow and Hunt. 

Bowey has been so consistently good over the journey of his 13 undefeated games, that I must admit to taking his game a bit for granted. Tackles well and always looks to have plenty of time when he ha the ball in hand. 

On to Hawthorn.... 7-0? Yes please!

Edited by CHF
typo


20 hours ago, Cards13 said:

I mentioned in game day but seeing it live the closing speed of our defenders is very impressive. Hunt and Smith have limitations for sure but I don't see them going out for another player who doesn't have the same ability to close down space or spoil that puts huge pressure on the opposition. 

We can wear some slip ups from those 2 but we can't replace the value of the above.

The Tomo's and maybe Hibbs become back ups and only come in for injuries.

Hibbo has not been slow at any of his footy with us other than for one season 2020.

His talent is very good at most skills in the game and thsts enabled him to be a warrior like in the Finals year. 

I don't discount the speed of both Hunty and Smithy in closing speed and that is special but not a must play attribute that keeps them in the team. 

Hunty played just best game defensively in his 100th vs Tigers and he was most unlucky on the season to miss out with injury. 

Smithy had improved a lot from last year but still has the brain fade and footy nous Clanger so that only he can produce. To be fair they are rarer and rarer these days and credit to him and the coaches as he is getting an injury free tun he deserves to make a fist of it.

We are so fortunate to have all three who  each brings different skill sets for us to enjoy and appreciate along with the AA others snd youngsters Petty Bowey and Riv.

Under 10 goals a game conceded is extraordinary considering our availability this season. 

Coaches  take a bow please 


 

How good a player has Bayley Fritsch become? His two goals broke the game open. He had a pretty “quiet” game but could still easily have had 5 - he was rarely inaccurate (2.2) and gave one off to Petracca. I can’t think of a player who does more damage with such a low disposal count in our team.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Like
    • 193 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies